1. [32684379] Morley EJ, Bracey A, Reiter M, Thode HC Jr, Singer AJ. Association of Pain Location With Computed Tomography Abnormalities in Emergeny Department Patients With Abdominal Pain. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 59(4):485-490, 2020 Oct.
2. [22099604] Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V. Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993-2008. J Surg Res. 175(2):185-90, 2012 Jun 15.
3. [22033948] Heverhagen JT, Pfestroff K, Heverhagen AE, Klose KJ, Kessler K, Sitter H. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective evaluation of patients with suspected appendicitis (diamond). J Magn Reson Imaging. 35(3):617-23, 2012 Mar.
4. [22533576] Kim K, Kim YH, Kim SY, et al. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 366(17):1596-605, 2012 Apr 26.
5. [28288060] Ferris M, Quan S, Kaplan BS, et al. The Global Incidence of Appendicitis: A Systematic Review of Population-based Studies. Annals of surgery 2017;266:237-41.
6. [20529988] Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD, et al. Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology. 256(2):460-5, 2010 Aug.
7. [24705731] Man E, Simonka Z, Varga A, Rarosi F, Lazar G. Impact of the Alvarado score on the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparing clinical judgment, Alvarado score, and a new modified score in suspected appendicitis: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 28(8):2398-405, 2014 Aug.
8. [25488354] Tan WJ, Acharyya S, Goh YC, et al. Prospective comparison of the Alvarado score and CT scan in the evaluation of suspected appendicitis: a proposed algorithm to guide CT use. J Am Coll Surg. 220(2):218-24, 2015 Feb.
9. [25542452] Apisarnthanarak P, Suvannarerg V, Pattaranutaporn P, Charoensak A, Raman SS, Apisarnthanarak A. Alvarado score: can it reduce unnecessary CT scans for evaluation of acute appendicitis?. Am J Emerg Med. 33(2):266-70, 2015 Feb.
10. [21251432] Krajewski S, Brown J, Phang PT, Raval M, Brown CJ. Impact of computed tomography of the abdomen on clinical outcomes in patients with acute right lower quadrant pain: a meta-analysis. Can J Surg. 2011;54(1):43-53.
11. [26763836] Hendriks IG, Langen RM, Janssen L, Verrijth-Wilms IM, Wouda S, Janzing HM. Does the Use of Diagnostic Imaging Reduce the Rate of Negative Appendectomy?. Acta Chir Belg. 115(6):393-6, 2015 Nov-Dec.
12. [31054752] Koberlein GC, Trout AT, Rigsby CK, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Appendicitis-Child. J Am Coll Radiol 2019;16:S252-S63.
13. [30627257] Mian M, Khosa F, Ali IT, et al. Faster magnetic resonance imaging in emergency room patients with right lower quadrant pain and suspected acute appendicitis. Pol J Radiol 2018;83:e340-e47.
14. [26938695] Yun SJ, Kim HC, Yang DM, et al. Diagnostic Usefulness of Low-Dose Nonenhanced Computed Tomography With Coronal Reformations in Patients With Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Comparison With Standard-Dose Computed Tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 40(3):485-92, 2016 May-Jun.
15. [31153565] Kolb M, Storz C, Kim JH, et al. Effect of a novel denoising technique on image quality and diagnostic accuracy in low-dose CT in patients with suspected appendicitis. Eur J Radiol. 116:198-204, 2019 Jul.
16. [23690436] Brassart N, Winant C, Tack D, Gevenois PA, De Maertelaer V, Keyzer C. Optimised z-axis coverage at multidetector-row CT in adults suspected of acute appendicitis. Br J Radiol. 86(1028):20130115, 2013 Aug.
17. [25331570] Corwin MT, Chang M, Fananapazir G, Seibert A, Lamba R. Accuracy and radiation dose reduction of a limited abdominopelvic CT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Abdom Imaging. 40(5):1177-82, 2015 Jun.
18. [26518583] O'Malley ME, Alharbi F, Chawla TP, Moshonov H. CT following US for possible appendicitis: anatomic coverage. Eur Radiol. 26(2):532-8, 2016 Feb.
19. [30063397] Elbanna KY, Mohammed MF, Chahal T, et al. Dual-Energy CT in Differentiating Nonperforated Gangrenous Appendicitis From Uncomplicated Appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 211(4):776-782, 2018 10.
20. [22700556] Leeuwenburgh MM, Wiarda BM, Bipat S, et al. Acute appendicitis on abdominal MR images: training readers to improve diagnostic accuracy. Radiology. 264(2):455-63, 2012 Aug.
21. [23266968] Avcu S, Cetin FA, Arslan H, Kemik O, Dulger AC. The value of diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient quantification in the diagnosis of perforated and nonperforated appendicitis. Diagn Interv Radiol. 19(2):106-10, 2013 Mar-Apr.
22. [20924585] Inci E, Kilickesmez O, Hocaoglu E, Aydin S, Bayramoglu S, Cimilli T. Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Eur Radiol. 21(4):768-75, 2011 Apr.
23. [31420704] Inoue A, Furukawa A, Nitta N, et al. Accuracy, criteria, and clinical significance of visual assessment on diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient quantification for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Abdom Radiol. 44(10):3235-3245, 2019 10.
24. [-3194700] American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: Acute Pelvic Pain in the Reproductive Age Group. Available at: https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69503/Narrative/.
25. [-3194118] American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: Acute Onset Flank Pain-Suspicion of Stone Disease (Urolithiasis). Available at: https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69362/Narrative/.
26. [19843741] Keyzer C, Cullus P, Tack D, De Maertelaer V, Bohy P, Gevenois PA. MDCT for suspected acute appendicitis in adults: impact of oral and IV contrast media at standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 193(5):1272-81, 2009 Nov.
27. [23023965] Pooler BD, Lawrence EM, Pickhardt PJ. Alternative diagnoses to suspected appendicitis at CT. Radiology. 265(3):733-42, 2012 Dec.
28. [31743429] Rud B, Vejborg TS, Rappeport ED, Reitsma JB, Wille-Jorgensen P. Computed tomography for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019(11), 2019 11 19.
29. [26341808] Barksdale AN, Hackman JL, Gaddis M, Gratton MC. Diagnosis and disposition are changed when board-certified emergency physicians use CT for non-traumatic abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med. 33(11):1646-50, 2015 Nov.
30. [33211574] Wang RC, Kornblith AE, Grupp-Phelan J, Smith-Bindman R, Kao LS, Fahimi J. Trends in Use of Diagnostic Imaging for Abdominal Pain in U.S. Emergency Departments. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 216(1):200-208, 2021 01.
31. [2239906] Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 132(5):910-925.
32. [31219315] Jones R, Olatunbode D, Dean J, et al. A feasibility randomised controlled trial to evaluate the role of computed tomography in adults with atypical right iliac fossa pain. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 101(8):546-551, 2019 Nov.
33. [25419588] Kontopodis N, Kouraki A, Panagiotakis G, Chatziioannou M, Spiridakis K. Efficacy of preoperative computed tomography imaging to reduce negative appendectomies in patients undergoing surgery for left lower quadrant abdominal pain. G Chir. 35(9-10):223-8, 2014 Sep-Oct.
34. [19733421] Hlibczuk V, Dattaro JA, Jin Z, Falzon L, Brown MD. Diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast computed tomography for appendicitis in adults: a systematic review. Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 55(1):51-59 e51.
35. [24168926] Leeuwenburgh MM, Wiarda BM, Jensch S, et al. Accuracy and interobserver agreement between MR-non-expert radiologists and MR-experts in reading MRI for suspected appendicitis. Eur J Radiol. 83(1):103-10, 2014 Jan.
36. [26807893] Petkovska I, Martin DR, Covington MF, et al. Accuracy of Unenhanced MR Imaging in the Detection of Acute Appendicitis: Single-Institution Clinical Performance Review. Radiology. 279(2):451-60, 2016 May.
37. [26526902] Byott S, Harris I. Rapid acquisition axial and coronal T2 HASTE MR in the evaluation of acute abdominal pain. Eur J Radiol. 85(1):286-290, 2016 Jan.
38. [24272981] Leeuwenburgh MM, Wiezer MJ, Wiarda BM, et al. Accuracy of MRI compared with ultrasound imaging and selective use of CT to discriminate simple from perforated appendicitis. Br J Surg. 101(1):e147-55, 2014 Jan.
39. [23481162] Leeuwenburgh MM, Wiarda BM, Wiezer MJ, et al. Comparison of imaging strategies with conditional contrast-enhanced CT and unenhanced MR imaging in patients suspected of having appendicitis: a multicenter diagnostic performance study. Radiology. 268(1):135-43, 2013 Jul.
40. [26901006] Duke E, Kalb B, Arif-Tiwari H, et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis. [Review]. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 206(3):508-17, 2016 Mar.
41. [22574093] Petroianu A, Alberti LR. Accuracy of the new radiographic sign of fecal loading in the cecum for differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis in comparison with other inflammatory diseases of right abdomen: a prospective study. J. med. life. 5(1):85-91, 2012 Feb 22.
42. [2934762] Puylaert JB.. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology. 158(2):355-60, 1986 Feb.
43. [1546592] Rioux M.. Sonographic detection of the normal and abnormal appendix. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 158(4):773-8, 1992 Apr.
44. [3282253] Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Townsend RR. Acute appendicitis: sonographic criteria based on 250 cases. Radiology. 167(2):327-9, 1988 May.
45. [3547490] Jeffrey RB Jr, Laing FC, Lewis FR. Acute appendicitis: high-resolution real-time US findings. Radiology. 163(1):11-4, 1987 Apr.
46. [10493202] Garcia Pena BM, Mandl KD, Kraus SJ, et al. Ultrasonography and limited computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis in children. JAMA. 1999; 282(11):1041-1046.
47. [15615956] Lee JH, Jeong YK, Park KB, Park JK, Jeong AK, Hwang JC. Operator-dependent techniques for graded compression sonography to detect the appendix and diagnose acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 184(1):91-7, 2005 Jan.
48. [23356200] Sezer TO, Gulece B, Zalluhoglu N, Gorgun M, Dogan S. Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in appendicitis. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med.. 21(5):633-6, 2012 Sep-Oct.
49. [25667065] Hasani SA, Fathi M, Daadpey M, Zare MA, Tavakoli N, Abbasi S. Accuracy of bedside emergency physician performed ultrasound in diagnosing different causes of acute abdominal pain: a prospective study. Clinical Imaging. 39(3):476-9, 2015 May-Jun.
50. [22421290] Kouame N, N'goan-Domoua AM, N'dri KJ, et al. The diagnostic value of indirect ultrasound signs during acute adult appendicitis. Diagn Interv Imaging. 93(3):e24-8, 2012 Mar.
51. [25499245] D'Souza N, D'Souza C, Grant D, Royston E, Farouk M. The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Int J Surg. 13:165-169, 2015 Jan.
52. [1456603] Foley CR, Latimer RG, Rimkus DS. Detection of acute appendicitis by technetium 99 HMPAO scanning. Am Surg. 1992; 58(12):761-765.
53. [23845254] Soyer P, Dohan A, Eveno C, et al. Pitfalls and mimickers at 64-section helical CT that cause negative appendectomy: an analysis from 1057 appendectomies. Clin Imaging. 37(5):895-901, 2013 Sep-Oct.
54. [22951113] Chiu YH, Chen JD, Wang SH, et al. Whether intravenous contrast is necessary for CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adult ED patients?. Acad Radiol. 20(1):73-8, 2013 Jan.
55. [24598250] Drake FT, Alfonso R, Bhargava P, et al. Enteral contrast in the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis: comparative effectiveness in a prospective surgical cohort. Ann Surg. 260(2):311-6, 2014 Aug.
56. [26031278] Xiong B, Zhong B, Li Z, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noncontrast CT in Detecting Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies. [Review]. Am Surg. 81(6):626-9, 2015 Jun.
57. [27318889] Wadhwani A, Guo L, Saude E, et al. Intravenous and Oral Contrast vs Intravenous Contrast Alone Computed Tomography for the Visualization of Appendix and Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Adult Emergency Department Patients. Can Assoc Radiol J. 67(3):234-41, 2016 Aug.
58. [26248155] Uyeda JW, Yu H, Ramalingam V, Devalapalli AP, Soto JA, Anderson SW. Evaluation of Acute Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Setting Using Computed Tomography Without Oral Contrast in Patients With Body Mass Index Greater Than 25. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2015;39:681-6.
59. [25320531] Park G, Lee SC, Choi BJ, Kim SJ. Stratified computed tomography findings improve diagnostic accuracy for appendicitis. World J Gastroenterol. 20(38):13942-9, 2014 Oct 14.
60. [22226440] Lai V, Chan WC, Lau HY, Yeung TW, Wong YC, Yuen MK. Diagnostic power of various computed tomography signs in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Clin Imaging. 36(1):29-34, 2012 Jan-Feb.
61. [25127845] Kim MY, Kim Y, Ryu JA, Kim TY. How to evaluate appendices with borderline diameters on CT: proposal of a quick solution to overcome the limitations of the established CT criteria. Acad Radiol. 21(12):1573-8, 2014 Dec.
62. [25831188] Verma R, Grechushkin V, Carter D, Barish M, Pryor A, Telem D. Use and accuracy of computed tomography scan in diagnosing perforated appendicitis. Am Surg. 81(4):404-7, 2015 Apr.
63. [22818790] Azok JT, Kim DH, Munoz Del Rio A, et al. Intraluminal air within an obstructed appendix: a CT sign of perforated or necrotic appendicitis. Acad Radiol. 19(10):1175-80, 2012 Oct.
64. [24633221] Kim MS, Park HW, Park JY, et al. Differentiation of early perforated from nonperforated appendicitis: MDCT findings, MDCT diagnostic performance, and clinical outcome. Abdom Imaging. 39(3):459-66, 2014 Jun.
65. [29916776] Eng KA, Abadeh A, Ligocki C, et al. Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of US, CT, and MRI as Second-Line Imaging Tests after an Initial US. Radiology. 288(3):717-727, 2018 Sep.
66. [25714280] Jones RP, Jeffrey RB, Shah BR, Desser TS, Rosenberg J, Olcott EW. Journal Club: the Alvarado score as a method for reducing the number of CT studies when appendiceal ultrasound fails to visualize the appendix in adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 204(3):519-26, 2015 Mar.
67. [25154940] Shah BR, Stewart J, Jeffrey RB, Olcott EW. Value of short-interval computed tomography when sonography fails to visualize the appendix and shows otherwise normal findings.[Erratum appears in J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Jul;34(7):1300 Note: Jeffery, R Brooke [corrected to Jeffrey, R Brooke]; PMID: 26112634]. J Ultrasound Med. 33(9):1589-95, 2014 Sep.
68. [24768483] Piyarom P, Kaewlai R. False-negative appendicitis at ultrasound: nature and association. Ultrasound Med Biol. 40(7):1483-9, 2014 Jul.
69. [22360013] Al-Ajerami Y.. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. East Mediterr Health J. 18(1):66-9, 2012 Jan.
70. [25475515] Boonstra PA, van Veen RN, Stockmann HB. Less negative appendectomies due to imaging in patients with suspected appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 29(8):2365-70, 2015 Aug.
71. [25771443] Kaewlai R, Lertlumsakulsub W, Srichareon P. Body mass index, pain score and Alvarado score are useful predictors of appendix visualization at ultrasound in adults. Ultrasound Med Biol. 41(6):1605-11, 2015 Jun.
72. [27203288] Lourenco P, Brown J, Leipsic J, Hague C. The current utility of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Clin Imaging. 40(5):944-8, 2016 Sep-Oct.
73. [22638942] Stewart JK, Olcott EW, Jeffrey RB. Sonography for appendicitis: nonvisualization of the appendix is an indication for active clinical observation rather than direct referral for computed tomography. J Clin Ultrasound. 40(8):455-61, 2012 Oct.
74. [31404675] Shen G, Wang J, Fei F, Mao M, Mei Z. Bedside ultrasonography for acute appendicitis: An updated diagnostic meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 70:1-9, 2019 Oct.
75. [22273324] Bondi M, Miller R, Zbar A, et al. Improving the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in suspected acute appendicitis by the combined transabdominal and transvaginal approach. Am Surg. 78(1):98-103, 2012 Jan.
76. [29869102] Wi SA, Kim DJ, Cho ES, Kim KA. Diagnostic performance of MRI for pregnant patients with clinically suspected appendicitis. Abdom Radiol. 43(12):3456-3461, 2018 12.
77. [31687887] Vasileiou G, Eid AI, Qian S, et al. Appendicitis in Pregnancy: A Post-Hoc Analysis of an EAST Multicenter Study. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 21(3):205-211, 2020 Apr.
78. [25148766] Ramalingam V, LeBedis C, Kelly JR, Uyeda J, Soto JA, Anderson SW. Evaluation of a sequential multi-modality imaging algorithm for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the pregnant female. EMERG. RADIOL.. 22(2):125-32, 2015 Apr.
79. [29948087] Poletti PA, Botsikas D, Becker M, et al. Suspicion of appendicitis in pregnant women: emergency evaluation by sonography and low-dose CT with oral contrast. European Radiology. 29(1):345-352, 2019 Jan.
80. [26215327] Burke LM, Bashir MR, Miller FH, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a 5-year multiinstitutional study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 213(5):693.e1-6, 2015 Nov.
81. [25291255] Theilen LH, Mellnick VM, Longman RE, et al. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging for suspected appendicitis in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 212(3):345.e1-6, 2015 Mar.
82. [26338256] Konrad J, Grand D, Lourenco A. MRI: first-line imaging modality for pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis. Abdom Imaging. 40(8):3359-64, 2015 Oct.
83. [23360736] Rapp EJ, Naim F, Kadivar K, Davarpanah A, Cornfeld D. Integrating MR imaging into the clinical workup of pregnant patients suspected of having appendicitis is associated with a lower negative laparotomy rate: single-institution study. Radiology. 267(1):137-44, 2013 Apr.
84. [-3188535] American College of Radiology. ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. Manual on Contrast Media. Available at: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Contrast-Manual.
85. [24151869] Hiersch L, Yogev Y, Ashwal E, From A, Ben-Haroush A, Peled Y. The impact of pregnancy on the accuracy and delay in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 27(13):1357-60, 2014 Sep.
86. [27554180] Segev L, Segev Y, Rayman S, Nissan A, Sadot E. The diagnostic performance of ultrasound for acute appendicitis in pregnant and young nonpregnant women: A case-control study. Int J Surg. 34:81-85, 2016 Oct.
87. [22370694] Lehnert BE, Gross JA, Linnau KF, Moshiri M. Utility of ultrasound for evaluating the appendix during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. EMERG. RADIOL.. 19(4):293-9, 2012 Aug.
88. [-3112580] American College of Radiology. ACR–SPR Practice Parameter for the Safe and Optimal Performance of Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=89+&releaseId=2.
89. [-3120926] American College of Radiology. ACR-SPR Practice Parameter for Imaging Pregnant or Potentially Pregnant Patients with Ionizing Radiation. Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=23+&releaseId=2.
90. [-3112890] American College of Radiology. ACR-ACOG-AIUM-SMFM-SRU Practice Parameter for the Performance of Standard Diagnostic Obstetrical Ultrasound. Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=28+&releaseId=2.
91. [-3188538] American College of Radiology. ACR Committee on MR Safety. 2024 ACR Manual on MR Safety. Available at: https://edge.sitecorecloud.io/americancoldf5f-acrorgf92a-productioncb02-3650/media/ACR/Files/Clinical/Radiology-Safety/Manual-on-MR-Safety.pdf.
92. [-3128692] American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction. Available at: https://edge.sitecorecloud.io/americancoldf5f-acrorgf92a-productioncb02-3650/media/ACR/Files/Clinical/Appropriateness-Criteria/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria-Radiation-Dose-Assessment-Introduction.pdf.