Routine Chest Imaging

Variant: 1 Routine chest imaging for hospital admission. No clinical concern for cardiopulmonary disease. Initial Imaging.

Procedure	Appropriateness Category	Relative Radiation Level
Radiography chest	Usually Not Appropriate	☢
MRI chest without and with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	O
MRI chest without IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	O
CT chest with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CT chest without and with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CT chest without IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CTA chest with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CTA chest without and with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
FDG-PET/CT skull base to mid-thigh	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢☢

Variant: 2 Routine preoperative chest imaging for noncardiothoracic surgery. No history of chronic cardiopulmonary disease or cardiothoracic surgery. Initial imaging.

Procedure	Appropriateness Category	Relative Radiation Level
Radiography chest	Usually Not Appropriate	☢
MRI chest without and with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	O
MRI chest without IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	O
CT chest with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CT chest without and with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CT chest without IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CTA chest with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CTA chest without and with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
FDG-PET/CT skull base to mid-thigh	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢☢

Variant: 3 Routine preoperative chest imaging for noncardiothoracic surgery. History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease or cardiothoracic surgery. Initial imaging.

Procedure	Appropriateness Category	Relative Radiation Level
Radiography chest	May Be Appropriate	☢
MRI chest without and with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	O
MRI chest without IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	O
CT chest with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CT chest without and with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CT chest without IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CTA chest with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CTA chest without and with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
FDG-PET/CT skull base to mid-thigh	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢☢

Variant: 4 Routine chest imaging. History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease with stable clinical findings. Surveillance chest imaging.

Procedure	Appropriateness Category	Relative Radiation Level
Radiography chest	May Be Appropriate	☢
CT chest without IV contrast	May Be Appropriate	☢☢☢
MRI chest without and with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	O
MRI chest without IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	O
CT chest with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CT chest without and with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CTA chest with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CTA chest without and with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
FDG-PET/CT skull base to mid-thigh	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢☢

Panel Members

Tami J. Bang, MD^a; Jonathan H. Chung, MD^b; Christopher M. Walker, MD^c; Anupama G. Brixey, MD^d; Jared D. Christensen, MD, MBA^e; Saadia A. Faiz, MD^f; Michael Hanak, MD^g; Stephen B. Hobbs, MD^h; Asha Kandathil, MDⁱ; Brent P. Little, MD^j; Rachna Madan, MBBS^k; William H. Moore, MD^l; Ilana B. Richman, MD, MHS^m; Belinda Setters, MDⁿ; Michael J. Todd, MD^o; Stephen C. Yang, MD^p; Edwin F. Donnelly, MD, PhD^q.

Summary of Literature Review

Introduction/Background

Special Imaging Considerations

Initial Imaging Definition

Initial imaging is defined as imaging at the beginning of the care episode for the medical condition defined by the variant. More than one procedure can be considered usually appropriate in the initial imaging evaluation when:

There are procedures that are equivalent alternatives (i.e., only one procedure will be ordered to provide the clinical information to effectively manage the patient’s care)

There are complementary procedures (i.e., more than one procedure is ordered as a set or simultaneously wherein each procedure provides unique clinical information to effectively manage the patient’s care).

Discussion of Procedures by Variant

Variant 1: Routine chest imaging for hospital admission. No clinical concern for cardiopulmonary disease. Initial Imaging.

Variant 1: Routine chest imaging for hospital admission. No clinical concern for cardiopulmonary disease. Initial Imaging.
A. CT chest with IV contrast

Variant 1: Routine chest imaging for hospital admission. No clinical concern for cardiopulmonary disease. Initial Imaging.
B. CT chest without and with IV contrast

Variant 1: Routine chest imaging for hospital admission. No clinical concern for cardiopulmonary disease. Initial Imaging.
C. CT chest without IV contrast

Variant 1: Routine chest imaging for hospital admission. No clinical concern for cardiopulmonary disease. Initial Imaging.
D. CTA chest with IV contrast

Variant 1: Routine chest imaging for hospital admission. No clinical concern for cardiopulmonary disease. Initial Imaging.
E. CTA chest without and with IV contrast

Variant 1: Routine chest imaging for hospital admission. No clinical concern for cardiopulmonary disease. Initial Imaging.
F. FDG-PET/CT skull base to mid-thigh

Variant 1: Routine chest imaging for hospital admission. No clinical concern for cardiopulmonary disease. Initial Imaging.
G. MRI chest without and with IV contrast

Variant 1: Routine chest imaging for hospital admission. No clinical concern for cardiopulmonary disease. Initial Imaging.
H. MRI chest without IV contrast

Variant 1: Routine chest imaging for hospital admission. No clinical concern for cardiopulmonary disease. Initial Imaging.
I. Radiography chest

Variant 2: Routine preoperative chest imaging for noncardiothoracic surgery. No history of chronic cardiopulmonary disease or cardiothoracic surgery. Initial imaging.

Variant 2: Routine preoperative chest imaging for noncardiothoracic surgery. No history of chronic cardiopulmonary disease or cardiothoracic surgery. Initial imaging.
A. CT chest with IV contrast

Variant 2: Routine preoperative chest imaging for noncardiothoracic surgery. No history of chronic cardiopulmonary disease or cardiothoracic surgery. Initial imaging.
I. Radiography chest

Variant 3: Routine preoperative chest imaging for noncardiothoracic surgery. History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease or cardiothoracic surgery. Initial imaging.

Variant 3: Routine preoperative chest imaging for noncardiothoracic surgery. History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease or cardiothoracic surgery. Initial imaging.
A. CT chest with IV contrast

Variant 3: Routine preoperative chest imaging for noncardiothoracic surgery. History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease or cardiothoracic surgery. Initial imaging.
I. Radiography chest

Variant 4: Routine chest imaging. History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease with stable clinical findings. Surveillance chest imaging.

Variant 4: Routine chest imaging. History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease with stable clinical findings. Surveillance chest imaging.
A. CT chest with IV contrast

Variant 4: Routine chest imaging. History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease with stable clinical findings. Surveillance chest imaging.
B. CT chest without and with IV contrast

Variant 4: Routine chest imaging. History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease with stable clinical findings. Surveillance chest imaging.
C. CT chest without IV contrast

Variant 4: Routine chest imaging. History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease with stable clinical findings. Surveillance chest imaging.
D. CTA chest with IV contrast

Variant 4: Routine chest imaging. History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease with stable clinical findings. Surveillance chest imaging.
E. CTA chest without and with IV contrast

Variant 4: Routine chest imaging. History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease with stable clinical findings. Surveillance chest imaging.
F. FDG-PET/CT skull base to mid-thigh

Variant 4: Routine chest imaging. History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease with stable clinical findings. Surveillance chest imaging.
G. MRI chest without and with IV contrast

Variant 4: Routine chest imaging. History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease with stable clinical findings. Surveillance chest imaging.
H. MRI chest without IV contrast

Variant 4: Routine chest imaging. History of chronic cardiopulmonary disease with stable clinical findings. Surveillance chest imaging.
I. Radiography chest

Summary of Highlights

Supporting Documents

The evidence table, literature search, and appendix for this topic are available at https://acsearch.acr.org/list. The appendix includes the strength of evidence assessment and the final rating round tabulations for each recommendation.

For additional information on the Appropriateness Criteria methodology and other supporting documents, please go to the ACR website at https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Appropriateness-Criteria.

Appropriateness Category Names and Definitions

Appropriateness Category Name	Appropriateness Rating	Appropriateness Category Definition
Usually Appropriate	7, 8, or 9	The imaging procedure or treatment is indicated in the specified clinical scenarios at a favorable risk-benefit ratio for patients.
May Be Appropriate	4, 5, or 6	The imaging procedure or treatment may be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios as an alternative to imaging procedures or treatments with a more favorable risk-benefit ratio, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is equivocal.
May Be Appropriate (Disagreement)	5	The individual ratings are too dispersed from the panel median. The different label provides transparency regarding the panel’s recommendation. “May be appropriate” is the rating category and a rating of 5 is assigned.
Usually Not Appropriate	1, 2, or 3	The imaging procedure or treatment is unlikely to be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is likely to be unfavorable.

Relative Radiation Level Information

Potential adverse health effects associated with radiation exposure are an important factor to consider when selecting the appropriate imaging procedure. Because there is a wide range of radiation exposures associated with different diagnostic procedures, a relative radiation level (RRL) indication has been included for each imaging examination. The RRLs are based on effective dose, which is a radiation dose quantity that is used to estimate population total radiation risk associated with an imaging procedure. Patients in the pediatric age group are at inherently higher risk from exposure, because of both organ sensitivity and longer life expectancy (relevant to the long latency that appears to accompany radiation exposure). For these reasons, the RRL dose estimate ranges for pediatric examinations are lower as compared with those specified for adults (see Table below). Additional information regarding radiation dose assessment for imaging examinations can be found in the ACR Appropriateness Criteria^® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction document.

Relative Radiation Level Designations
Relative Radiation Level*	Adult Effective Dose Estimate Range	Pediatric Effective Dose Estimate Range
O	0 mSv	0 mSv
☢	<0.1 mSv	<0.03 mSv
☢☢	0.1-1 mSv	0.03-0.3 mSv
☢☢☢	1-10 mSv	0.3-3 mSv
☢☢☢☢	10-30 mSv	3-10 mSv
☢☢☢☢☢	30-100 mSv	10-30 mSv
*RRL assignments for some of the examinations cannot be made, because the actual patient doses in these procedures vary as a function of a number of factors (e.g., region of the body exposed to ionizing radiation, the imaging guidance that is used). The RRLs for these examinations are designated as “Varies.”

References

1.	Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging:, Donnelly EF, Kazerooni EA, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria R Lung Cancer Screening. J. Am. Coll. Radiol.. 15(11S):S341-S346, 2018 Nov.
2.	Kerr IH. The preoperative chest X-ray. Br J Anaesth. 1974;46(8):558-563.
3.	Adeko OO, Ariba AJ, Olatunji AA, Toyobo OO. Routine chest radiograph in pre-employment medical examination for healthcare workers: Time for a review of the protocol. [Review]. Niger Postgrad Med J. 24(2):93-96, 2017 Apr-Jun.
4.	Ndii MK, Kimani NM, Onyambu CK. Utility of Routine Chest Radiographs in Kenya. East Afr Med J 2014;91:216-8.
5.	Preoperative chest radiology. National study by the Royal College of Radiologists. Lancet. 1979;2(8133):83-86.
6.	Rucker L, Frye EB, Staten MA. Usefulness of screening chest roentgenograms in preoperative patients. Jama. 1983;250(23):3209-3211.
7.	Skinner S. Guide to thoracic imaging. Aust Fam Physician. 44(8):558-62, 2015 Aug.
8.	American College of Radiology. ACR–NASCI–SIR–SPR Practice Parameter for the Performance and Interpretation of Body Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA). Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=164+&releaseId=2.
9.	Millor M, Bartolome P, Pons MJ, et al. Whole-body computed tomography: a new point of view in a hospital check-up unit? Our experience in 6516 patients. Radiol Med (Torino). 124(12):1199-1211, 2019 Dec.
10.	Kanza RE, Allard C, Berube M. Cardiac findings on non-gated chest computed tomography: A clinical and pictorial review. [Review]. Eur J Radiol. 85(2):435-51, 2016 Feb.
11.	Shimoni Z, Rosenberg M, Amit L, Froom P. Chest Radiography Should Be Requested Only on Admission Based on Clinical Grounds. South Med J. 113(1):20-22, 2020 01.
12.	Malnick S, Duek G, Beilinson N, et al. Routine chest X-ray on hospital admission: does it contribute to diagnosis or treatment? Isr Med Assoc J. 2010;12(6):357-361.
13.	Martinez-Palli G, Cardenas A. Pre operative cardio pulmonary assessment of the liver transplant candidate. Ann Hepatol 2011;10:421-33.
14.	Prediletto R, Catapano G, Bottai M, et al. Role of the chest radiograph in the preoperative assessment of the pulmonary function in patients with cirrhosis candidates to liver transplant. Radiol Med 2004;108:320-34.
15.	Martin P, DiMartini A, Feng S, Brown R, Jr., Fallon M. Evaluation for liver transplantation in adults: 2013 practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the American Society of Transplantation. Hepatology 2014;59:1144-65.
16.	Young EM, Farmer JD. Preoperative Chest Radiography in Elective Surgery: Review and Update. [Review]. S D Med. 70(2):81-87, 2017 Feb.
17.	Joo HS, Wong J, Naik VN, Savoldelli GL. The value of screening preoperative chest x-rays: a systematic review. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52(6):568-574.
18.	Archer C, Levy AR, McGregor M. Value of routine preoperative chest x-rays: a meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 40(11):1022-7, 1993 Nov.
19.	Gagner M, Chiasson A. Preoperative chest x-ray films in elective surgery: a valid screening tool. Can J Surg. 1990;33(4):271-274.
20.	Bozbas SS, Yilmaz EB, Dogrul I, et al. Preoperative pulmonary evaluation of liver transplant candidates: results from 341 adult patients. Ann Transplant 2011;16:88-96.
21.	den Harder AM, de Heer LM, de Jong PA, Suyker WJ, Leiner T, Budde RPJ. Frequency of abnormal findings on routine chest radiography before cardiac surgery. Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery. 155(5):2035-2040, 2018 05.
22.	Charpak Y, Blery C, Chastang C, Szatan M, Fourgeaux B. Prospective assessment of a protocol for selective ordering of preoperative chest x-rays. Can J Anaesth. 1988;35(3 ( Pt 1)):259-264.
23.	Grier DJ, Watson LJ, Hartnell GG, Wilde P. Are routine chest radiographs prior to angiography of any value? Clin Radiol. 1993;48(2):131-133.
24.	De Hert S, Staender S, Fritsch G, et al. Pre-operative evaluation of adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery: Updated guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 35(6):407-465, 2018 06.
25.	Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters, Apfelbaum JL, Connis RT, et al. Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiology. 116(3):522-38, 2012 Mar.
26.	Qaseem A, Snow V, Fitterman N, et al. Risk assessment for and strategies to reduce perioperative pulmonary complications for patients undergoing noncardiothoracic surgery: a guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 144(8):575-80, 2006 Apr 18.
27.	Stone ME, Salter B, Fischer A. Perioperative management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. [Review]. Br J Anaesth. 107 Suppl 1:i16-26, 2011 Dec.
28.	Crossley GH, Poole JE, Rozner MA, et al. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Expert Consensus Statement on the perioperative management of patients with implantable defibrillators, pacemakers and arrhythmia monitors: facilities and patient management: executive summary this document was developed as a joint project with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and in collaboration with the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Heart Rhythm. 8(7):e1-18, 2011 Jul.
29.	Healey JS, Merchant R, Simpson C, et al. Society position statement : Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society joint position statement on the perioperative management of patients with implanted pacemakers, defibrillators, and neurostimulating devices. Can J Anaesth. 59(4):394-407, 2012 Apr.
30.	Hobbs SB, Chung JH, Walker CM, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Diffuse Lung Disease. J Am Coll Radiol 2021;18:S320-S29.
31.	Lee AS, Scofield RH, Hammitt KM, et al. Consensus Guidelines for Evaluation and Management of Pulmonary Disease in Sjogren's. Chest. 159(2):683-698, 2021 02.
32.	Cox CW, Chung JH, Ackman JB, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Occupational Lung Diseases. J Am Coll Radiol 2020;17:S188-S97.
33.	Sirajuddin A, Donnelly EF, Crabtree TP, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Pulmonary Hypertension. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14:S350-S61.
34.	Hatabu H, Ohno Y, Gefter WB, et al. Expanding Applications of Pulmonary MRI in the Clinical Evaluation of Lung Disorders: Fleischner Society Position Paper. Radiology. 297(2):286-301, 2020 Nov.
35.	Ackman JB. A practical guide to nonvascular thoracic magnetic resonance imaging. [Review]. J Thorac Imaging. 29(1):17-29, 2014 Jan.
36.	American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction. Available at: https://edge.sitecorecloud.io/americancoldf5f-acrorgf92a-productioncb02-3650/media/ACR/Files/Clinical/Appropriateness-Criteria/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria-Radiation-Dose-Assessment-Introduction.pdf.

Disclaimer

The ACR Committee on Appropriateness Criteria and its expert panels have developed criteria for determining appropriate imaging examinations for diagnosis and treatment of specified medical condition(s). These criteria are intended to guide radiologists, radiation oncologists and referring physicians in making decisions regarding radiologic imaging and treatment. Generally, the complexity and severity of a patient’s clinical condition should dictate the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Only those examinations generally used for evaluation of the patient’s condition are ranked. Other imaging studies necessary to evaluate other co-existent diseases or other medical consequences of this condition are not considered in this document. The availability of equipment or personnel may influence the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Imaging techniques classified as investigational by the FDA have not been considered in developing these criteria; however, study of new equipment and applications should be encouraged. The ultimate decision regarding the appropriateness of any specific radiologic examination or treatment must be made by the referring physician and radiologist in light of all the circumstances presented in an individual examination.