AC Portal
Document Navigator

Intensive Care Unit Patients

Variant: 1   Admission or transfer to intensive care unit. Initial imaging.
Procedure Appropriateness Category Relative Radiation Level
Radiography chest portable Usually Appropriate
US chest May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) O

Variant: 2   Stable intensive care unit patient. No change in clinical status. Initial imaging.
Procedure Appropriateness Category Relative Radiation Level
Radiography chest portable May Be Appropriate (Disagreement)
US chest Usually Not Appropriate O

Variant: 3   Intensive care unit patient with clinically worsening condition. Initial imaging.
Procedure Appropriateness Category Relative Radiation Level
Radiography chest portable Usually Appropriate
US chest May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) O

Variant: 4   Intensive care unit patient following support device placement. Initial imaging.
Procedure Appropriateness Category Relative Radiation Level
Radiography chest portable Usually Appropriate
US chest May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) O

Variant: 5   Intensive care unit patient. Post chest tube or mediastinal tube removal. Initial imaging.
Procedure Appropriateness Category Relative Radiation Level
Radiography chest portable May Be Appropriate (Disagreement)
US chest Usually Not Appropriate O

Panel Members
Summary of Literature Review
Introduction/Background
Special Imaging Considerations
Initial Imaging Definition

Initial imaging is defined as imaging at the beginning of the care episode for the medical condition defined by the variant. More than one procedure can be considered usually appropriate in the initial imaging evaluation when:

  • There are procedures that are equivalent alternatives (i.e., only one procedure will be ordered to provide the clinical information to effectively manage the patient’s care)

OR

  • There are complementary procedures (i.e., more than one procedure is ordered as a set or simultaneously wherein each procedure provides unique clinical information to effectively manage the patient’s care).
Discussion of Procedures by Variant
Variant 1: Admission or transfer to intensive care unit. Initial imaging.
Variant 1: Admission or transfer to intensive care unit. Initial imaging.
A. Radiography Chest Portable
Variant 1: Admission or transfer to intensive care unit. Initial imaging.
B. US Chest
Variant 2: Stable intensive care unit patient. No change in clinical status. Initial imaging.
Variant 2: Stable intensive care unit patient. No change in clinical status. Initial imaging.
A. Radiography Chest Portable
Variant 2: Stable intensive care unit patient. No change in clinical status. Initial imaging.
B. US Chest
Variant 3: Intensive care unit patient with clinically worsening condition. Initial imaging.
Variant 3: Intensive care unit patient with clinically worsening condition. Initial imaging.
A. Radiography Chest Portable
Variant 3: Intensive care unit patient with clinically worsening condition. Initial imaging.
B. US Chest
Variant 4: Intensive care unit patient following support device placement. Initial imaging.
Variant 4: Intensive care unit patient following support device placement. Initial imaging.
A. Radiography Chest Portable
Variant 4: Intensive care unit patient following support device placement. Initial imaging.
B. US Chest
Variant 5: Intensive care unit patient. Post chest tube or mediastinal tube removal. Initial imaging.
Variant 5: Intensive care unit patient. Post chest tube or mediastinal tube removal. Initial imaging.
A. Radiography Chest Portable
Variant 5: Intensive care unit patient. Post chest tube or mediastinal tube removal. Initial imaging.
B. US Chest
Summary of Recommendations
Supporting Documents

The evidence table, literature search, and appendix for this topic are available at https://acsearch.acr.org/list. The appendix includes the strength of evidence assessment and the final rating round tabulations for each recommendation.

For additional information on the Appropriateness Criteria methodology and other supporting documents, please go to the ACR website at https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Appropriateness-Criteria.

Appropriateness Category Names and Definitions

Appropriateness Category Name

Appropriateness Rating

Appropriateness Category Definition

Usually Appropriate

7, 8, or 9

The imaging procedure or treatment is indicated in the specified clinical scenarios at a favorable risk-benefit ratio for patients.

May Be Appropriate

4, 5, or 6

The imaging procedure or treatment may be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios as an alternative to imaging procedures or treatments with a more favorable risk-benefit ratio, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is equivocal.

May Be Appropriate (Disagreement)

5

The individual ratings are too dispersed from the panel median. The different label provides transparency regarding the panel’s recommendation. “May be appropriate” is the rating category and a rating of 5 is assigned.

Usually Not Appropriate

1, 2, or 3

The imaging procedure or treatment is unlikely to be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is likely to be unfavorable.

Relative Radiation Level Information

Potential adverse health effects associated with radiation exposure are an important factor to consider when selecting the appropriate imaging procedure. Because there is a wide range of radiation exposures associated with different diagnostic procedures, a relative radiation level (RRL) indication has been included for each imaging examination. The RRLs are based on effective dose, which is a radiation dose quantity that is used to estimate population total radiation risk associated with an imaging procedure. Patients in the pediatric age group are at inherently higher risk from exposure, because of both organ sensitivity and longer life expectancy (relevant to the long latency that appears to accompany radiation exposure). For these reasons, the RRL dose estimate ranges for pediatric examinations are lower as compared with those specified for adults (see Table below). Additional information regarding radiation dose assessment for imaging examinations can be found in the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction document.

Relative Radiation Level Designations

Relative Radiation Level*

Adult Effective Dose Estimate Range

Pediatric Effective Dose Estimate Range

O

0 mSv

 0 mSv

<0.1 mSv

<0.03 mSv

☢☢

0.1-1 mSv

0.03-0.3 mSv

☢☢☢

1-10 mSv

0.3-3 mSv

☢☢☢☢

10-30 mSv

3-10 mSv

☢☢☢☢☢

30-100 mSv

10-30 mSv

*RRL assignments for some of the examinations cannot be made, because the actual patient doses in these procedures vary as a function of a number of factors (e.g., region of the body exposed to ionizing radiation, the imaging guidance that is used). The RRLs for these examinations are designated as “Varies.”

References
1. Palazzetti V, Gasparri E, Gambini C, et al. Chest radiography in intensive care: an irreplaceable survey?. Radiologia Medica. 118(5):744-51, 2013 Aug.
2. Mortani Barbosa EJ Jr, Lynch MC, Langlotz CP, Gefter WB. Optimization of Radiology Reports for Intensive Care Unit Portable Chest Radiographs: Perceptions and Preferences of Radiologists and ICU Practitioners. Journal of Thoracic Imaging. 31(1):43-8, 2016 Jan.
3. Xirouchaki N, Kondili E, Prinianakis G, Malliotakis P, Georgopoulos D. Impact of lung ultrasound on clinical decision making in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 40(1):57-65, 2014 Jan.
4. Phillips CT, Manning WJ. Advantages and pitfalls of pocket ultrasound vs daily chest radiography in the coronary care unit: A single-user experience. Echocardiography. 34(5):656-661, 2017 May.
5. Winkler MH, Touw HR, van de Ven PM, Twisk J, Tuinman PR. Diagnostic Accuracy of Chest Radiograph, and When Concomitantly Studied Lung Ultrasound, in Critically Ill Patients With Respiratory Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Critical Care Medicine. 2018 Mar 29.
6. Tolsma M, Rijpstra TA, Schultz MJ, Mulder PG, van der Meer NJ. Significant changes in the practice of chest radiography in Dutch intensive care units: a web-based survey. Annals of Intensive Care. 4(1):10, 2014 Apr 04.
7. Mets O, Spronk PE, Binnekade J, Stoker J, de Mol BA, Schultz MJ. Elimination of daily routine chest radiographs does not change on-demand radiography practice in post-cardiothoracic surgery patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 134(1):139-44, 2007 Jul.
8. Ganapathy A, Adhikari NK, Spiegelman J, Scales DC. Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [Review]. Critical Care (London, England). 16(2):R68, 2012 Dec 12.
9. Sy E, Luong M, Quon M, et al. Implementation of a quality improvement initiative to reduce daily chest radiographs in the intensive care unit. [Review]. BMJ Qual Saf. 25(5):379-85, 2016 May.
10. Tolsma M, Rijpstra TA, Rosseel PM, et al. Defining indications for selective chest radiography in the first 24 hours after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 150(1):225-9, 2015 Jul.
11. Reeb J, Falcoz PE, Olland A, Massard G. Are daily routine chest radiographs necessary after pulmonary surgery in adult patients?. [Review]. Interactive Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery. 17(6):995-8, 2013 Dec.
12. Ebrahimi A, Yousefifard M, Mohammad Kazemi H, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Chest Ultrasonography versus Chest Radiography for Identification of Pneumothorax: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Tanaffus. 13(4):29-40, 2014.
13. Graat ME, Choi G, Wolthuis EK, et al. The clinical value of daily routine chest radiographs in a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit is low. Critical Care (London, England). 10(1):R11, 2006 Feb.
14. Al Shahrani A, Al-Surimi K. Daily routine versus on-demand chest radiograph policy and practice in adult ICU patients- clinicians' perspective. BMC med. imaging. 18(1):4, 2018 04 03.
15. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS. Daily chest roentgenograms are unnecessary in nonhypoxic patients who have undergone pulmonary resection by thoracotomy. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 92(2):440-3, 2011 Aug.
16. Abdalla W, Elgendy M, Abdelaziz AA, Ammar MA. Lung ultrasound versus chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumothorax in critically ill patients: A prospective, single-blind study. Saudi journal of anaesthesia. 10(3):265-9, 2016 Jul-Sep.
17. Ashton-Cleary DT. Is thoracic ultrasound a viable alternative to conventional imaging in the critical care setting?. [Review]. Br J Anaesth. 111(2):152-60, 2013 Aug.
18. Bensted K, McKenzie J, Havryk A, Plit M, Ben-Menachem E. Lung Ultrasound After Transbronchial Biopsy for Pneumothorax Screening in Post-Lung Transplant Patients. Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology. 25(1):42-47, 2018 Jan.
19. Mongodi S, Via G, Girard M, et al. Lung Ultrasound for Early Diagnosis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. Chest. 149(4):969-80, 2016 Apr.
20. Wang G, Ji X, Xu Y, Xiang X. Lung ultrasound: a promising tool to monitor ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients. [Review]. Critical Care (London, England). 20(1):320, 2016 10 27.
21. Brogi E, Gargani L, Bignami E, et al. Thoracic ultrasound for pleural effusion in the intensive care unit: a narrative review from diagnosis to treatment. [Review]. Crit Care. 21(1):325, 2017 Dec 28.
22. Ohman J, Harjola VP, Karjalainen P, Lassus J. Rapid cardiothoracic ultrasound protocol for diagnosis of acute heart failure in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med. 26(2):112-117, 2019 Apr.
23. Bass CM, Sajed DR, Adedipe AA, West TE. Pulmonary ultrasound and pulse oximetry versus chest radiography and arterial blood gas analysis for the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a pilot study. Critical Care (London, England). 19:282, 2015 Jul 21.
24. Gray P, Sullivan G, Ostryzniuk P, McEwen TA, Rigby M, Roberts DE. Value of postprocedural chest radiographs in the adult intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1992;20(11):1513-1518.
25. Strain DS, Kinasewitz GT, Vereen LE, George RB. Value of routine daily chest x-rays in the medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(7):534-536.
26. Silverstein DS, Livingston DH, Elcavage J, Kovar L, Kelly KM. The utility of routine daily chest radiography in the surgical intensive care unit. J Trauma. 1993;35(4):643-646.
27. O'Brien W, Karski JM, Cheng D, Carroll-Munro J, Peniston C, Sandler A. Routine chest roentgenography on admission to intensive care unit after heart operations: is it of any value? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;113(1):130-133.
28. Henschke CI, Pasternack GS, Schroeder S, Hart KK, Herman PG. Bedside chest radiography: diagnostic efficacy. Radiology. 1983;149(1):23-26.
29. Horst HM, Fagan B, Beute GH. Chest radiographs in surgical intensive care patients: a valuable "routine". Henry Ford Hosp Med J. 1986;34(2):84-86.
30. Brunel W, Coleman DL, Schwartz DE, Peper E, Cohen NH. Assessment of routine chest roentgenograms and the physical examination to confirm endotracheal tube position. Chest. 1989;96(5):1043-1045.
31. Marik PE, Janower ML. The impact of routine chest radiography on ICU management decisions: an observational study. Am J Crit Care. 1997;6(2):95-98.
32. Bekemeyer WB, Crapo RO, Calhoon S, Cannon CY, Clayton PD. Efficacy of chest radiography in a respiratory intensive care unit. A prospective study. Chest. 1985;88(5):691-696.
33. Bhagwanjee S, Muckart DJ. Routine daily chest radiography is not indicated for ventilated patients in a surgical ICU. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(12):1335-1338.
34. Kollef MH, Legare EJ, Damiano M. Endotracheal tube misplacement: incidence, risk factors, and impact of a quality improvement program. South Med J. 1994;87(2):248-254.
35. Wang ML, Schuster KM, Bhattacharya B, Maung AA, Kaplan LJ, Davis KA. Repositioning endotracheal tubes in the intensive care unit: depth changes poorly correlate with postrepositioning radiographic location. The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 75(1):146-9, 2013 Jul.
36. Cruz J, Ferra M, Kasarabada A, Gasperino J, Zigmund B. Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Routine Daily Chest Radiography in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Tracheostomy Tubes: A Retrospective Review. [Review]. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 31(5):333-7, 2016 Jun.
37. Lakhani P.. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Endotracheal Tube Position and X-ray Image Classification: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Digital Imaging. 30(4):460-468, 2017 Aug.
38. Hourmozdi JJ, Markin A, Johnson B, Fleming PR, Miller JB. Routine Chest Radiography Is Not Necessary After Ultrasound-Guided Right Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization. Crit Care Med. 44(9):e804-8, 2016 09.
39. Woodland DC, Randall Cooper C, Farzan Rashid M, et al. Routine chest X-ray is unnecessary after ultrasound-guided central venous line placement in the operating room. J Crit Care. 46:13-16, 2018 08.
40. Sise MJ, Hollingsworth P, Brimm JE, Peters RM, Virgilio RW, Shackford SR. Complications of the flow-directed pulmonary artery catheter: A prospective analysis in 219 patients. Crit Care Med. 1981;9(4):315-318.
41. Fan EMP, Tan SB, Ang SY. Nasogastric tube placement confirmation: where we are and where we should be heading. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare 2017;26:189-95.
42. Das SK, Choupoo NS, Haldar R, Lahkar A. Transtracheal ultrasound for verification of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [Review]. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 62(4):413-23, 2015 Apr.
43. Hosseini JS, Talebian MT, Ghafari MH, Eslami V. Secondary confirmation of endotracheal tube position by diaphragm motion in right subcostal ultrasound view. International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science. 3(2):113-7, 2013 Apr.
44. Jenkins JA, Gharahbaghian L, Doniger SJ, et al. Sonographic Identification of Tube Thoracostomy Study (SITTS): Confirmation of Intrathoracic Placement. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 13(4):305-11, 2012 Sep.
45. Zanobetti M, Coppa A, Bulletti F, et al. Verification of correct central venous catheter placement in the emergency department: comparison between ultrasonography and chest radiography. Internal & Emergency Medicine. 8(2):173-80, 2013 Mar.
46. Amir R, Knio ZO, Mahmood F, et al. Ultrasound as a Screening Tool for Central Venous Catheter Positioning and Exclusion of Pneumothorax. Critical Care Medicine. 45(7):1192-1198, 2017 Jul.
47. Galante O, Slutsky T, Fuchs L, et al. Single-Operator Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheter Insertion Verifies Proper Tip Placement. Critical Care Medicine. 45(10):e994-e1000, 2017 Oct.
48. Raman D, Sharma M, Moghekar A, Wang X, Hatipoglu U. Utilization of Thoracic Ultrasound for Confirmation of Central Venous Catheter Placement and Exclusion of Pneumothorax: A Novel Technique in Real-Time Application. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. 885066617705839, 2017 Jan 01.
49. Wilson SP, Assaf S, Lahham S, et al. Simplified point-of-care ultrasound protocol to confirm central venous catheter placement: A prospective study. World journal of emergency medicine. 8(1):25-28, 2017.
50. Kamalipour H, Ahmadi S, Kamali K, Moaref A, Shafa M, Kamalipour P. Ultrasound for Localization of Central Venous Catheter: A Good Alternative to Chest X-Ray?. Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine. 6(5):e38834, 2016 Oct.
51. Ablordeppey EA, Drewry AM, Beyer AB, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Central Venous Catheter Confirmation by Bedside Ultrasound Versus Chest Radiography in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [Review]. Critical Care Medicine. 45(4):715-724, 2017 Apr.
52. Zatelli M, Vezzali N. 4-Point ultrasonography to confirm the correct position of the nasogastric tube in 114 critically ill patients. Journal of Ultrasound. 20(1):53-58, 2017 Mar.
53. Kim HM, So BH, Jeong WJ, Choi SM, Park KN. The effectiveness of ultrasonography in verifying the placement of a nasogastric tube in patients with low consciousness at an emergency center. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine. 20:38, 2012 Jun 12.
54. Sepehripour AH, Farid S, Shah R. Is routine chest radiography indicated following chest drain removal after cardiothoracic surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;14(6):834-838.
55. Clec'h C, Simon P, Hamdi A, et al. Are daily routine chest radiographs useful in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients? A randomized study. Intensive Care Medicine. 34(2):264-70, 2008 Feb.
56. Eisenberg RL, Khabbaz KR. Are chest radiographs routinely indicated after chest tube removal following cardiac surgery? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(1):122-124.
57. Khan T, Chawla G, Daniel R, Swamy M, Dimitri WR. Is routine chest X-ray following mediastinal drain removal after cardiac surgery useful? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34(3):542-544.
58. McCormick JT, O'Mara MS, Papasavas PK, Caushaj PF. The use of routine chest X-ray films after chest tube removal in postoperative cardiac patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(6):2161-2164.
59. Pacharn P, Heller DN, Kammen BF, et al. Are chest radiographs routinely necessary following thoracostomy tube removal? Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32(2):138-142.
60. Whitehouse MR, Patel A, Morgan JA. The necessity of routine post-thoracostomy tube chest radiographs in post-operative thoracic surgery patients. Surgeon. 2009;7(2):79-81.
61. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction. Available at: https://edge.sitecorecloud.io/americancoldf5f-acrorgf92a-productioncb02-3650/media/ACR/Files/Clinical/Appropriateness-Criteria/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria-Radiation-Dose-Assessment-Introduction.pdf.
Disclaimer

The ACR Committee on Appropriateness Criteria and its expert panels have developed criteria for determining appropriate imaging examinations for diagnosis and treatment of specified medical condition(s). These criteria are intended to guide radiologists, radiation oncologists and referring physicians in making decisions regarding radiologic imaging and treatment. Generally, the complexity and severity of a patient’s clinical condition should dictate the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Only those examinations generally used for evaluation of the patient’s condition are ranked.  Other imaging studies necessary to evaluate other co-existent diseases or other medical consequences of this condition are not considered in this document. The availability of equipment or personnel may influence the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Imaging techniques classified as investigational by the FDA have not been considered in developing these criteria; however, study of new equipment and applications should be encouraged. The ultimate decision regarding the appropriateness of any specific radiologic examination or treatment must be made by the referring physician and radiologist in light of all the circumstances presented in an individual examination.