Management of Uterine Fibroids
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category |
| Hysteroscopic myomectomy | Usually Appropriate |
| Laparoscopic or open myomectomy | Usually Appropriate |
| Medical management | Usually Appropriate |
| MR-guided high-frequency focused ultrasound ablation | Usually Appropriate |
| Uterine artery embolization | Usually Appropriate |
| Laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Endometrial ablation | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Hysterectomy | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category |
| Laparoscopic or open myomectomy | Usually Appropriate |
| Medical management | Usually Appropriate |
| MR-guided high-frequency focused ultrasound ablation | Usually Appropriate |
| Uterine artery embolization | Usually Appropriate |
| Hysterectomy | May Be Appropriate |
| Hysteroscopic myomectomy | May Be Appropriate |
| Endometrial ablation | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category |
| Medical management | Usually Appropriate |
| Uterine artery embolization | Usually Appropriate |
| Hysterectomy | May Be Appropriate |
| MR-guided high-frequency focused ultrasound ablation | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Endometrial ablation | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Hysteroscopic myomectomy | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Laparoscopic or open myomectomy | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category |
| Hysteroscopic myomectomy | Usually Appropriate |
| Medical management | Usually Appropriate |
| Uterine artery embolization | May Be Appropriate |
| MR-guided high-frequency focused ultrasound ablation | May Be Appropriate |
| Hysterectomy | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Endometrial ablation | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Laparoscopic or open myomectomy | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category |
| Hysterectomy | Usually Appropriate |
| Laparoscopic or open myomectomy | May Be Appropriate |
| Uterine artery embolization | May Be Appropriate |
| Hysteroscopic myomectomy | May Be Appropriate |
| MR-guided high-frequency focused ultrasound ablation | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Endometrial ablation | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Medical management | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category |
| Hysteroscopic myomectomy | Usually Appropriate |
| Laparoscopic or open myomectomy | Usually Appropriate |
| Uterine artery embolization | May Be Appropriate |
| Medical management | May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) |
| MR-guided high-frequency focused ultrasound ablation | May Be Appropriate |
| Laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Endometrial ablation | Usually Not Appropriate |
| Hysterectomy | Usually Not Appropriate |
A. Endometrial ablation
B. Hysterectomy
C. Hysteroscopic myomectomy
D. Laparoscopic or open myomectomy
E. Laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion
F. Medical management
G. MR-guided high-frequency focused ultrasound ablation
H. Uterine artery embolization
A. Endometrial ablation
B. Hysterectomy
C. Hysteroscopic myomectomy
D. Laparoscopic or open myomectomy
E. Laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion
F. Medical management
G. MR-guided high-frequency focused ultrasound ablation
H. Uterine artery embolization
A. Endometrial ablation
B. Hysterectomy
C. Hysteroscopic myomectomy
D. Laparoscopic or open myomectomy
E. Laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion
F. Medical management
G. MR-guided high-frequency focused ultrasound ablation
H. Uterine artery embolization
A. Endometrial ablation
B. Hysterectomy
C. Hysteroscopic myomectomy
D. Laparoscopic or open myomectomy
E. Laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion
F. Medical management
G. MR-guided high-frequency focused ultrasound ablation
H. Uterine artery embolization
A. Endometrial ablation
B. Hysterectomy
C. Hysteroscopic myomectomy
D. Laparoscopic or open myomectomy
E. Laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion
F. Medical management
G. MR-guided high-frequency focused ultrasound ablation
H. Uterine artery embolization
A. Endometrial ablation
B. Hysterectomy
C. Hysteroscopic myomectomy
D. Laparoscopic or open myomectomy
E. Laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion
F. Medical management
G. MR-guided high-frequency focused ultrasound ablation
H. Uterine artery embolization
The evidence table, literature search, and appendix for this topic are available at https://acsearch.acr.org/list. The appendix includes the strength of evidence assessment and the final rating round tabulations for each recommendation.
For additional information on the Appropriateness Criteria methodology and other supporting documents, please go to the ACR website at https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Appropriateness-Criteria.
|
Appropriateness Category Name |
Appropriateness Rating |
Appropriateness Category Definition |
|
Usually Appropriate |
7, 8, or 9 |
The imaging procedure or treatment is indicated in the specified clinical scenarios at a favorable risk-benefit ratio for patients. |
|
May Be Appropriate |
4, 5, or 6 |
The imaging procedure or treatment may be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios as an alternative to imaging procedures or treatments with a more favorable risk-benefit ratio, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is equivocal. |
|
May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) |
5 |
The individual ratings are too dispersed from the panel median. The different label provides transparency regarding the panel’s recommendation. “May be appropriate” is the rating category and a rating of 5 is assigned. |
|
Usually Not Appropriate |
1, 2, or 3 |
The imaging procedure or treatment is unlikely to be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is likely to be unfavorable. |
| 1. | Ascher SM, Wasnik AP, Robbins JB, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Fibroids. J Am Coll Radiol 2022;19:S319-S28. | |
| 2. | Kohn JR, Shamshirsaz AA, Popek E, Guan X, Belfort MA, Fox KA. Pregnancy after endometrial ablation: a systematic review. BJOG 2018;125:43-53. | |
| 3. | Kim T, Purdy MP, Kendall-Rauchfuss L, et al. Myomectomy associated blood transfusion risk and morbidity after surgery. Fertil Steril. 114(1):175-184, 2020 07. | |
| 4. | Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Lu D, Thomas L, et al. Short-term quality of life after myomectomy for uterine fibroids from the COMPARE-UF Fibroid Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 222(4):345.e1-345.e22, 2020 04. | |
| 5. | Daniels J, Middleton LJ, Cheed V, et al. Uterine artery embolization or myomectomy for women with uterine fibroids: Four-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X 2022;13:100139. | |
| 6. | Manyonda I, Belli AM, Lumsden MA, et al. Uterine-Artery Embolization or Myomectomy for Uterine Fibroids. N Engl J Med. 383(5):440-451, 2020 07 30. | |
| 7. | Casini ML, Rossi F, Agostini R, Unfer V. Effects of the position of fibroids on fertility. Gynecol Endocrinol 2006;22:106-9. | |
| 8. | Jayaprakasan K, Polanski L, Sahu B, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N. Surgical intervention versus expectant management for endometrial polyps in subfertile women. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2014;2014:CD009592. | |
| 9. | Perez-Medina T, Bajo-Arenas J, Salazar F, et al. Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1632-5. | |
| 10. | Litta P, Conte L, De Marchi F, Saccardi C, Angioni S. Pregnancy outcome after hysteroscopic myomectomy. Gynecol Endocrinol 2014;30:149-52. | |
| 11. | Wise LA, Thomas L, Anderson S, et al. Route of myomectomy and fertility: a prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 2022;117:1083-93. | |
| 12. | Chen R, Su Z, Yang L, Xin L, Yuan X, Wang Y. The effects and costs of laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy in patients with uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC surg.. 20(1):55, 2020 Mar 20. | |
| 13. | de Bruijn AM, Ankum WM, Reekers JA, et al. Uterine artery embolization vs hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: 10-year outcomes from the randomized EMMY trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 215(6):745.e1-745.e12, 2016 Dec. | |
| 14. | Kim HS, Oh SY, Choi SJ, et al. Uterine rupture in pregnancies following myomectomy: A multicenter case series. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2016;59:454-62. | |
| 15. | Mara M, Kubinova K, Maskova J, Horak P, Belsan T, Kuzel D. Uterine artery embolization versus laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion: the outcomes of a prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 35(5):1041-52, 2012 Oct. | |
| 16. | American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins–Gynecology. Management of Symptomatic Uterine Leiomyomas: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 228. Obstet Gynecol 2021;137:e100-e15. | |
| 17. | Peitsidis P, Koukoulomati A. Tranexamic acid for the management of uterine fibroid tumors: A systematic review of the current evidence. World journal of clinical cases 2014;2:893-8. | |
| 18. | Archer DF, Stewart EA, Jain RI, et al. Elagolix for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids: results from a phase 2a proof-of-concept study. Fertil Steril. 108(1):152-160.e4, 2017 07. | |
| 19. | Carr BR, Stewart EA, Archer DF, et al. Elagolix Alone or With Add-Back Therapy in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding and Uterine Leiomyomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 132(5):1252-1264, 2018 11. | |
| 20. | Hoshiai H, Seki Y, Kusumoto T, Kudou K, Tanimoto M. Relugolix for oral treatment of uterine leiomyomas: a dose-finding, randomized, controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 21(1):375, 2021 10 28. | |
| 21. | Osuga Y, Enya K, Kudou K, Hoshiai H. Relugolix, a novel oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, in the treatment of pain symptoms associated with uterine fibroids: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study in Japanese women. Fertil Steril. 112(5):922-929.e2, 2019 11. | |
| 22. | Schlaff WD, Ackerman RT, Al-Hendy A, et al. Elagolix for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Women with Uterine Fibroids. N Engl J Med. 382(4):328-340, 2020 01 23. | |
| 23. | Simon JA, Al-Hendy A, Archer DF, et al. Elagolix Treatment for Up to 12 Months in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding and Uterine Leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol. 135(6):1313-1326, 2020 06. | |
| 24. | de Milliano I, Huirne JAF, Thurkow AL, et al. Ulipristal acetate vs gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists prior to laparoscopic myomectomy (MYOMEX trial): Short-term results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 99(1):89-98, 2020 01. | |
| 25. | Al-Hendy A, Lukes AS, Poindexter AN 3rd, et al. Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy. N Engl J Med. 384(7):630-642, 2021 02 18. | |
| 26. | Liu JH, Soper D, Lukes A, et al. Ulipristal Acetate for Treatment of Uterine Leiomyomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 132(5):1241-1251, 2018 11. | |
| 27. | Lukes AS, Soper D, Harrington A, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life With Ulipristal Acetate for Treatment of Uterine Leiomyomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 133(5):869-878, 2019 05. | |
| 28. | Donnez J, Tatarchuk TF, Bouchard P, et al. Ulipristal acetate versus placebo for fibroid treatment before surgery. N Engl J Med 2012;366:409-20. | |
| 29. | Donnez J, Vazquez F, Tomaszewski J, et al. Long-term treatment of uterine fibroids with ulipristal acetate ?. Fertil Steril 2014;101:1565-73 e1-18. | |
| 30. | Osuga Y, Nakano Y, Yamauchi Y, Takanashi M. Ulipristal acetate compared with leuprorelin acetate for Japanese women with symptomatic uterine fibroids: a phase III randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 116(1):189-197, 2021 07. | |
| 31. | Gatti M, Poluzzi E, De Ponti F, Raschi E. Liver Injury with Ulipristal Acetate: Exploring the Underlying Pharmacological Basis. Drug Saf. 43(12):1277-1285, 2020 12. | |
| 32. | Yoon EL, Yuk JS. Use of Ulipristal Acetate and Risk of Liver Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 106(6):1773-1782, 2021 05 13. | |
| 33. | Sridhar D, Kohi MP. Updates on MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids. Semin Intervent Radiol 2018;35:17-22. | |
| 34. | Jacoby VL, Kohi MP, Poder L, et al. PROMISe trial: a pilot, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound for uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril. 105(3):773-780, 2016 Mar. | |
| 35. | Laughlin-Tommaso S, Barnard EP, AbdElmagied AM, et al. FIRSTT study: randomized controlled trial of uterine artery embolization vs focused ultrasound surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 220(2):174.e1-174.e13, 2019 02. | |
| 36. | Barnard EP, AbdElmagied AM, Vaughan LE, et al. Periprocedural outcomes comparing fibroid embolization and focused ultrasound: a randomized controlled trial and comprehensive cohort analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 216(5):500.e1-500.e11, 2017 05. | |
| 37. | Chen J, Li Y, Wang Z, et al. Evaluation of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids: an IDEAL prospective exploration study. BJOG. 125(3):354-364, 2018 02. | |
| 38. | Gorny KR, Borah BJ, Brown DL, Woodrum DA, Stewart EA, Hesley GK. Incidence of additional treatments in women treated with MR-guided focused US for symptomatic uterine fibroids: review of 138 patients with an average follow-up of 2.8 years. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014;25:1506-12. | |
| 39. | Froeling V, Meckelburg K, Schreiter NF, et al. Outcome of uterine artery embolization versus MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroids: long-term results. Eur J Radiol. 82(12):2265-9, 2013 Dec. | |
| 40. | Mohr-Sasson A, Machtinger R, Mashiach R, et al. Long-term outcome of MR-guided focused ultrasound treatment and laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic uterine fibroid tumors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 219(4):375.e1-375.e7, 2018 10. | |
| 41. | Rabinovici J, David M, Fukunishi H, et al. Pregnancy outcome after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for conservative treatment of uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril 2010;93:199-209. | |
| 42. | Ananthakrishnan G, Murray L, Ritchie M, et al. Randomized comparison of uterine artery embolization (UAE) with surgical treatment in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (REST trial): subanalysis of 5-year MRI findings. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 36(3):676-81, 2013 Jun. | |
| 43. | Liu L, Wang T, Lei B. Uterine Artery Embolization Compared with High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Myomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 28(2):218-227, 2021 02. | |
| 44. | Torre A, Fauconnier A, Kahn V, Limot O, Bussierres L, Pelage JP. Fertility after uterine artery embolization for symptomatic multiple fibroids with no other infertility factors. Eur Radiol. 27(7):2850-2859, 2017 Jul. | |
| 45. | Serres-Cousine O, Kuijper FM, Curis E, Atashroo D. Clinical investigation of fertility after uterine artery embolization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 225(4):403.e1-403.e22, 2021 10. | |
| 46. | Pisco JM, Duarte M, Bilhim T, et al. Spontaneous Pregnancy with a Live Birth after Conventional and Partial Uterine Fibroid Embolization. Radiology. 285(1):302-310, 2017 10. | |
| 47. | Mara M, Maskova J, Fucikova Z, Kuzel D, Belsan T, Sosna O. Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2008;31:73-85. | |
| 48. | Jain P, Rajaram S, Gupta B, Goel N, Srivastava H. Randomized controlled trial of thermal balloon ablation versus vaginal hysterectomy for leiomyoma-induced heavy menstrual bleeding. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 135(2):140-144, 2016 Nov. | |
| 49. | Ibiebele I, Nippita TA, Baber R, Torvaldsen S. A study of pregnancy after endometrial ablation using linked population data. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2021;100:286-93. | |
| 50. | Stewart EA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Catherino WH, Lalitkumar S, Gupta D, Vollenhoven B. Uterine fibroids. [Review]. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2:16043, 2016 06 23. | |
| 51. | Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Khan Z, Weaver AL, Smith CY, Rocca WA, Stewart EA. Cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity after hysterectomy with ovarian conservation: a cohort study. Menopause 2018;25:483-92. | |
| 52. | Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Satish A, Khan Z, Smith CY, Rocca WA, Stewart EA. Long-term risk of de novo mental health conditions after hysterectomy with ovarian conservation: a cohort study. Menopause 2020;27:33-42. | |
| 53. | Tuesley KM, Protani MM, Webb PM, et al. Hysterectomy with and without oophorectomy and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020;223:723 e1-23 e16. | |
| 54. | Ruuskanen A, Hippelainen M, Sipola P, Manninen H. Uterine artery embolisation versus hysterectomy for leiomyomas: primary and 2-year follow-up results of a randomised prospective clinical trial. Eur Radiol. 20(10):2524-32, 2010 Oct. | |
| 55. | Yeh YT, Li PC, Wu KC, et al. Hysterectomies are associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and bone fracture: A population-based cohort study. PLoS One 2020;15:e0243037. | |
| 56. | Rocca WA, Grossardt BR, Shuster LT, Stewart EA. Hysterectomy, oophorectomy, estrogen, and the risk of dementia. Neurodegener Dis 2012;10:175-8. | |
| 57. | Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2015;2015:CD003677. | |
| 58. | Albright BB, Witte T, Tofte AN, et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016;23:18-27. | |
| 59. | Mengerink BB, van der Wurff AA, ter Haar JF, van Rooij IA, Pijnenborg JM. Effect of undiagnosed deep adenomyosis after failed NovaSure endometrial ablation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:239-44. | |
| 60. | Fraser IS, Romer T, Parke S, et al. Effective treatment of heavy and/or prolonged menstrual bleeding with an oral contraceptive containing estradiol valerate and dienogest: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial. Hum Reprod 2011;26:2698-708. | |
| 61. | Jensen JT, Parke S, Mellinger U, Machlitt A, Fraser IS. Effective treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding with estradiol valerate and dienogest: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:777-87. | |
| 62. | Shaaban MM, Zakherah MS, El-Nashar SA, Sayed GH. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system compared to low dose combined oral contraceptive pills for idiopathic menorrhagia: a randomized clinical trial. Contraception 2011;83:48-54. | |
| 63. | Shaaban OM, Ali MK, Sabra AM, Abd El Aal DE. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus a low-dose combined oral contraceptive for treatment of adenomyotic uteri: a randomized clinical trial. Contraception 2015;92:301-7. | |
| 64. | Muneyyirci-Delale O, Archer DF, Owens CD, et al. Efficacy and safety of elagolix with add-back therapy in women with uterine fibroids and coexisting adenomyosis. F S Rep 2021;2:338-46. | |
| 65. | Froeling V, Scheurig-Muenkler C, Hamm B, Kroencke TJ. Uterine artery embolization to treat uterine adenomyosis with or without uterine leiomyomata: results of symptom control and health-related quality of life 40 months after treatment. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 35(3):523-9, 2012 Jun. | |
| 66. | de Bruijn AM, Smink M, Hehenkamp WJK, et al. Uterine Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: 7-Year Clinical Follow-up Using UFS-Qol Questionnaire. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 40(9):1344-1350, 2017 Sep. | |
| 67. | Smeets AJ, Nijenhuis RJ, Boekkooi PF, Vervest HA, van Rooij WJ, Lohle PN. Long-term follow-up of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 35(4):815-9, 2012 Aug. | |
| 68. | de Bruijn AM, Smink M, Lohle PNM, et al. Uterine Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [Review]. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 28(12):1629-1642.e1, 2017 Dec. | |
| 69. | de Bruijn AM, Lohle PN, Huirne JA, et al. Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Hysterectomy in the Treatment of Symptomatic Adenomyosis: Protocol for the Randomized QUESTA Trial. JMIR Res Protoc 2018;7:e47. | |
| 70. | Nguyen MD. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Volumetric High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Surgery for Pedunculated Subserosal Uterine Leiomyoma. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2020;9:104-05. | |
| 71. | Park H, Yoon SW, Kim KA, Jung Kim D, Jung SG. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound treatment of pedunculated subserosal uterine fibroids: a preliminary report. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012;23:1589-93. | |
| 72. | Smeets AJ, Nijenhuis RJ, Boekkooi PF, et al. Safety and effectiveness of uterine artery embolization in patients with pedunculated fibroids. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009;20:1172-5. | |
| 73. | Radeleff B, Eiers M, Bellemann N, et al. Expulsion of dominant submucosal fibroids after uterine artery embolization. Eur J Radiol. 75(1):e57-63, 2010 Jul. | |
| 74. | Lee SJ, Kim MD, Kim GM, Won JY, Park SI, Lee DY. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroids in postmenopausal women. Clinical Imaging. 40(1):106-9, 2016 Jan-Feb.Clin Imaging. 40(1):106-9, 2016 Jan-Feb. | |
| 75. | Brohl AS, Li L, Andikyan V, et al. Age-stratified risk of unexpected uterine sarcoma following surgery for presumed benign leiomyoma. Oncologist 2015;20:433-9. | |
| 76. | Ulin M, Ali M, Chaudhry ZT, Al-Hendy A, Yang Q. Uterine fibroids in menopause and perimenopause. [Review]. Menopause. 27(2):238-242, 2020 02. | |
| 77. | Palomba S, Zupi E, Russo T, et al. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: short-term outcomes. Fertil Steril 2007;88:942-51. | |
| 78. | Seracchioli R, Rossi S, Govoni F, et al. Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod 2000;15:2663-8. | |
| 79. | Morgante G, Centini G, Troia L, Orvieto R, De Leo V. Ulipristal acetate before in vitro fertilization: efficacy in infertile women with submucous fibroids. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 18(1):50, 2020 May 19. | |
| 80. | Hanstede MM, Tempany CM, Stewart EA. Focused ultrasound surgery of intramural leiomyomas may facilitate fertility: a case report. Fertil Steril 2007;88:497 e5-7. | |
| 81. | Zaher S, Lyons D, Regan L. Uncomplicated term vaginal delivery following magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine fibroids. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2010;6:e28. | |
| 82. | Bouwsma EV, Gorny KR, Hesley GK, Jensen JR, Peterson LG, Stewart EA. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for leiomyoma-associated infertility. Fertil Steril 2011;96:e9-e12. |