AC Portal
Document Navigator

Suspected Pulmonary Hypertension

Variant: 1   Suspected pulmonary hypertension. Initial imaging.
Procedure Appropriateness Category Relative Radiation Level
US echocardiography transthoracic resting Usually Appropriate O
Radiography chest Usually Appropriate ☢
CT chest with IV contrast Usually Appropriate ☢☢☢
CTA chest with IV contrast Usually Appropriate ☢☢☢
US echocardiography transesophageal May Be Appropriate O
MRI heart function and morphology without and with IV contrast May Be Appropriate O
MRI heart function and morphology without IV contrast May Be Appropriate O
V/Q scan lung May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) ☢☢☢
Catheterization right heart Usually Not Appropriate ☢☢
Arteriography pulmonary with right heart catheterization Usually Not Appropriate ☢☢☢☢
MRA chest without and with IV contrast Usually Not Appropriate O
MRA chest without IV contrast Usually Not Appropriate O
CT chest without and with IV contrast Usually Not Appropriate ☢☢☢
CT chest without IV contrast Usually Not Appropriate ☢☢☢

Panel Members
Arlene Sirajuddin, MDa; S. Mojdeh Mirmomen, MDb; Travis S. Henry, MDc; Asha Kandathil, MDd; Aine Marie Kelly, MBBChe; Christopher S. King, MDf; Christopher T. Kuzniewski, MDg; Andrew R. Lai, MD, MPHh; Elizabeth Lee, MDi; Maria D. Martin, MDj; Parth Mehta, MDk; Michael F. Morris, MDl; Constantine A. Raptis, MDm; Eric A. Roberge, MDn; Kim L. Sandler, MDo; Edwin F. Donnelly, MD, PhDp.
Summary of Literature Review
Introduction/Background
Special Imaging Considerations
Initial Imaging Definition

Initial imaging is defined as imaging at the beginning of the care episode for the medical condition defined by the variant. More than one procedure can be considered usually appropriate in the initial imaging evaluation when:

  • There are procedures that are equivalent alternatives (i.e., only one procedure will be ordered to provide the clinical information to effectively manage the patient’s care)

OR

  • There are complementary procedures (i.e., more than one procedure is ordered as a set or simultaneously wherein each procedure provides unique clinical information to effectively manage the patient’s care).
Discussion of Procedures by Variant
Variant 1: Suspected pulmonary hypertension. Initial imaging.
Variant 1: Suspected pulmonary hypertension. Initial imaging.
A. Radiography Chest
Variant 1: Suspected pulmonary hypertension. Initial imaging.
B. US Echocardiography Transthoracic Resting
Variant 1: Suspected pulmonary hypertension. Initial imaging.
C. US Echocardiography Transesophageal
Variant 1: Suspected pulmonary hypertension. Initial imaging.
D. V/Q Scan Lung
Variant 1: Suspected pulmonary hypertension. Initial imaging.
E. CT Chest
Variant 1: Suspected pulmonary hypertension. Initial imaging.
F. CTA Chest
Variant 1: Suspected pulmonary hypertension. Initial imaging.
G. MRI Heart Function and Morphology
Variant 1: Suspected pulmonary hypertension. Initial imaging.
H. MRA Chest
Variant 1: Suspected pulmonary hypertension. Initial imaging.
I. Catheterization Right Heart
Variant 1: Suspected pulmonary hypertension. Initial imaging.
J. Arteriography Pulmonary with Right Heart Catheterization
Summary of Recommendations
Supporting Documents

The evidence table, literature search, and appendix for this topic are available at https://acsearch.acr.org/list. The appendix includes the strength of evidence assessment and the final rating round tabulations for each recommendation.

For additional information on the Appropriateness Criteria methodology and other supporting documents, please go to the ACR website at https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Appropriateness-Criteria.

Appropriateness Category Names and Definitions

Appropriateness Category Name

Appropriateness Rating

Appropriateness Category Definition

Usually Appropriate

7, 8, or 9

The imaging procedure or treatment is indicated in the specified clinical scenarios at a favorable risk-benefit ratio for patients.

May Be Appropriate

4, 5, or 6

The imaging procedure or treatment may be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios as an alternative to imaging procedures or treatments with a more favorable risk-benefit ratio, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is equivocal.

May Be Appropriate (Disagreement)

5

The individual ratings are too dispersed from the panel median. The different label provides transparency regarding the panel’s recommendation. “May be appropriate” is the rating category and a rating of 5 is assigned.

Usually Not Appropriate

1, 2, or 3

The imaging procedure or treatment is unlikely to be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is likely to be unfavorable.
Relative Radiation Level Information

Potential adverse health effects associated with radiation exposure are an important factor to consider when selecting the appropriate imaging procedure. Because there is a wide range of radiation exposures associated with different diagnostic procedures, a relative radiation level (RRL) indication has been included for each imaging examination. The RRLs are based on effective dose, which is a radiation dose quantity that is used to estimate population total radiation risk associated with an imaging procedure. Patients in the pediatric age group are at inherently higher risk from exposure, because of both organ sensitivity and longer life expectancy (relevant to the long latency that appears to accompany radiation exposure). For these reasons, the RRL dose estimate ranges for pediatric examinations are lower as compared with those specified for adults (see Table below). Additional information regarding radiation dose assessment for imaging examinations can be found in the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction document.

Relative Radiation Level Designations

Relative Radiation Level*

Adult Effective Dose Estimate Range

Pediatric Effective Dose Estimate Range

O

0 mSv

 0 mSv

☢

<0.1 mSv

<0.03 mSv

☢☢

0.1-1 mSv

0.03-0.3 mSv

☢☢☢

1-10 mSv

0.3-3 mSv

☢☢☢☢

10-30 mSv

3-10 mSv

☢☢☢☢☢

30-100 mSv

10-30 mSv

*RRL assignments for some of the examinations cannot be made, because the actual patient doses in these procedures vary as a function of a number of factors (e.g., region of the body exposed to ionizing radiation, the imaging guidance that is used). The RRLs for these examinations are designated as “Varies.”
References
1. Kovacs G, Berghold A, Scheidl S, Olschewski H. Pulmonary arterial pressure during rest and exercise in healthy subjects: a systematic review. Eur Respir J. 2009; 34(4):888-894.
2. Simonneau G, Montani D, Celermajer DS, et al. Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. [Review]. Eur Respir J. 53(1), 2019 01.
3. Hoeper MM, Barbera JA, Channick RN, et al. Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of non-pulmonary arterial hypertension pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54(1 Suppl):S85-96.
4. Sahay S.. Evaluation and classification of pulmonary arterial hypertension. [Review]. J. thorac. dis.. 11(Suppl 14):S1789-S1799, 2019 Sep.
5. Hatano S, Strasser T. Primary pulmonary hypertension : report on a WHO meeting, Geneva, 15-17 October 1973. Geneva; Albany, N.Y.: World Health Organization; distributed by Q Corporation; 1975.
6. Rich S, editor. Primary Pulmonary Hypertension: Executive Summary from the World Symposium - Primary Pulmonary Hypertension 1998.  Available from the World Health Organization via the Internet (http://www.wsphassociation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Primary-Pulmonary-Hypertension-Evian-1998.pdf).
7. Simonneau G, Galie N, Rubin LJ, et al. Clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43(12 Suppl S):5S-12S.
8. Simonneau G, Gatzoulis MA, Adatia I, et al. Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(25 Suppl):D34-41.
9. Simonneau G, Robbins IM, Beghetti M, et al. Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54(1 Suppl):S43-54.
10. McCann C, Gopalan D, Sheares K, Screaton N. Imaging in pulmonary hypertension, part 1: clinical perspectives, classification, imaging techniques and imaging algorithm. [Review]. Postgrad Med J. 88(1039):271-9, 2012 May.
11. McGoon M, Gutterman D, Steen V, et al. Screening, early detection, and diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 126(1 Suppl):14S-34S, 2004 Jul.
12. American College of Radiology. ACR–NASCI–SIR–SPR Practice Parameter for the Performance and Interpretation of Body Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA). Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=164+&releaseId=2.
13. Algeo S, Morrison D, Ovitt T, Goldman S. Noninvasive detection of pulmonary hypertension. Clin Cardiol. 1984; 7(3):148-156.
14. Chetty KG, Brown SE, Light RW. Identification of pulmonary hypertension in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from routine chest radiographs. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982; 126(2):338-341.
15. Lupi E, Dumont C, Tejada VM, Horwitz S, Galland F. A radiologic index of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest. 1975; 68(1):28-31.
16. Matthay RA, Schwarz MI, Ellis JH, Jr., et al. Pulmonary artery hypertension in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: determination by chest radiography. Invest Radiol. 1981; 16(2):95-100.
17. Schmidt HC, Kauczor HU, Schild HH, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in patients with chronic pulmonary thromboembolism: chest radiograph and CT evaluation before and after surgery. Eur Radiol. 1996; 6(6):817-825.
18. Teichmann V, Jezek V, Herles F. Relevance of width of right descending branch of pulmonary artery as a radiological sign of pulmonary hypertension. Thorax. 1970; 25(1):91-96.
19. Woodruff WW, 3rd, Hoeck BE, Chitwood WR, Jr., Lyerly HK, Sabiston DC, Jr., Chen JT. Radiographic findings in pulmonary hypertension from unresolved embolism. AJR. 1985; 144(4):681-686.
20. Miniati M, Monti S, Airo E, et al. Accuracy of chest radiography in predicting pulmonary hypertension: a case-control study. Thromb Res. 2014;133(3):345-351.
21. Barbosa EJ, Jr., Gupta NK, Torigian DA, Gefter WB. Current role of imaging in the diagnosis and management of pulmonary hypertension. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(6):1320-1331.
22. Cordina RL, Playford D, Lang I, Celermajer DS. State-of-the-Art Review: Echocardiography in Pulmonary Hypertension. Heart Lung Circ. 28(9):1351-1364, 2019 Sep.
23. Ni JR, Yan PJ, Liu SD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography for pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2019;9:e033084.
24. Galie N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, et al. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J. 37(1):67-119, 2016 Jan 01.
25. Schneider M, Ran H, Pistritto AM, et al. Pulmonary artery to ascending aorta ratio by echocardiography: A strong predictor for presence and severity of pulmonary hypertension. PLoS ONE. 15(7):e0235716, 2020.
26. Yagi M, Taniguchi H, Kondoh Y, et al. CT-determined pulmonary artery to aorta ratio as a predictor of elevated pulmonary artery pressure and survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respirology. 22(7):1393-1399, 2017 10.
27. Madonna R, Bonitatibus G, Vitulli P, Pierdomenico SD, Galie N, De Caterina R. Association of the European Society of Cardiology echocardiographic probability grading for pulmonary hypertension with short and mid-term clinical outcomes after heart valve surgery. Vascul Pharmacol. 125-126:106648, 2020 Feb - Mar.
28. Di Bello V, Conte L, Delle Donne MG, et al. Advantages of real time three-dimensional echocardiography in the assessment of right ventricular volumes and function in patients with pulmonary hypertension compared with conventional two-dimensional echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2013;30(7):820-828.
29. Huang KC, Lin LY, Hwang JJ, Lin LC. Three-Dimensional Echocardiography-Derived Non-Invasive Right Ventricular Pressure-Volume Analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 43(9):2045-2053, 2017 09.
30. McLaughlin VV, Archer SL, Badesch DB, et al. ACCF/AHA 2009 expert consensus document on pulmonary hypertension a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians; American Thoracic Society, Inc.; and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1573-619.
31. Kleczynski P, Dziewierz A, Wiktorowicz A, et al. Prognostic value of tricuspid regurgitation velocity and probability of pulmonary hypertension in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 33(12):1931-1938, 2017 Dec.
32. Narendra Kumar K, Singh NG, P S N, Patil TA, N M. Transesophageal Echocardiographic Assessment of Pulmonary Artery-to-Ascending Aorta Ratio for the Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension in Cardiac Surgical Patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 31(5):1702-1706, 2017 Oct.
33. Moradi F, Morris TA, Hoh CK. Perfusion Scintigraphy in Diagnosis and Management of Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension. [Review]. Radiographics. 39(1):169-185, 2019 Jan-Feb.
34. Nachand D, Huang S, Bullen J, Heresi GA, Renapurkar RD. Assessment of ventilation-perfusion scans in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension before and after surgery and correlation with clinical parameters. Clin Imaging. 66:147-152, 2020 Oct.
35. Mehari A, Igbineweka N, Allen D, Nichols J, Thein SL, Weir NA. Abnormal Ventilation-Perfusion Scan Is Associated with Pulmonary Hypertension in Sickle Cell Adults. J Nucl Med. 60(1):86-92, 2019 01.
36. Tunariu N, Gibbs SJ, Win Z, et al. Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy is more sensitive than multidetector CTPA in detecting chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease as a treatable cause of pulmonary hypertension. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48(5):680-684.
37. He J, Fang W, Lv B, et al. Diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: comparison of ventilation/perfusion scanning and multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiography with pulmonary angiography. Nucl Med Commun. 33(5):459-63, 2012 May.
38. Chan K, Ioannidis S, Coghlan JG, Hall M, Schreiber BE. Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension With Abnormal V/Q Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 11(10):1487-1493, 2018 10.
39. Tan RT, Kuzo R, Goodman LR, Siegel R, Haasler GB, Presberg KW. Utility of CT scan evaluation for predicting pulmonary hypertension in patients with parenchymal lung disease. Medical College of Wisconsin Lung Transplant Group. Chest. 1998; 113(5):1250-1256.
40. Zisman DA, Karlamangla AS, Ross DJ, et al. High-resolution chest CT findings do not predict the presence of pulmonary hypertension in advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 2007; 132(3):773-779.
41. Chan AL, Juarez MM, Shelton DK, et al. Novel computed tomographic chest metrics to detect pulmonary hypertension. BMC Med Imaging. 2011;11:7.
42. Truong QA, Bhatia HS, Szymonifka J, et al. A four-tier classification system of pulmonary artery metrics on computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of pulmonary hypertension. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 12(1):60-66, 2018 Jan - Feb.
43. Yaghi S, Novikov A, Trandafirescu T. Clinical update on pulmonary hypertension. [Review]. J Investig Med. 68(4):821-827, 2020 04.
44. Bax S, Jacob J, Ahmed R, et al. Right Ventricular to Left Ventricular Ratio at CT Pulmonary Angiogram Predicts Mortality in Interstitial Lung Disease. Chest. 157(1):89-98, 2020 01.
45. Remy-Jardin M, Duhamel A, Deken V, Bouaziz N, Dumont P, Remy J. Systemic collateral supply in patients with chronic thromboembolic and primary pulmonary hypertension: assessment with multi-detector row helical CT angiography. Radiology. 2005; 235(1):274-281.
46. Aluja Jaramillo F, Gutierrez FR, Diaz Telli FG, Yevenes Aravena S, Javidan-Nejad C, Bhalla S. Approach to Pulmonary Hypertension: From CT to Clinical Diagnosis. [Review]. Radiographics. 38(2):357-373, 2018 Mar-Apr.
47. Frazier AA, Burke AP. The imaging of pulmonary hypertension. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2012;33(6):535-551.
48. Frazier AA, Franks TJ, Mohammed TL, Ozbudak IH, Galvin JR. From the Archives of the AFIP: pulmonary veno-occlusive disease and pulmonary capillary hemangiomatosis. Radiographics. 2007;27(3):867-882.
49. McComb BL, Ravenel JG, Steiner RM, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Dyspnea-Noncardiovascular Origin. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15:S291-S301.
50. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: Dyspnea-Suspected Cardiac Origin. Available at: https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69407/Narrative/.
51. Melzig C, Worz S, Egenlauf B, et al. Combined automated 3D volumetry by pulmonary CT angiography and echocardiography for detection of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Radiol. 29(11):6059-6068, 2019 Nov.
52. Akbal OY, Kaymaz C, Tanboga IH, et al. Extrinsic compression of left main coronary artery by aneurysmal pulmonary artery in severe pulmonary hypertension: its correlates, clinical impact, and management strategies. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 19(11):1302-1308, 2018 11 01.
53. Galie N, Saia F, Palazzini M, et al. Left Main Coronary Artery Compression in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 69(23):2808-2817, 2017 Jun 13.
54. Dournes G, Verdier D, Montaudon M, et al. Dual-energy CT perfusion and angiography in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: diagnostic accuracy and concordance with radionuclide scintigraphy. Eur Radiol. 24(1):42-51, 2014 Jan.
55. Masy M, Giordano J, Petyt G, et al. Dual-energy CT (DECT) lung perfusion in pulmonary hypertension: concordance rate with V/Q scintigraphy in diagnosing chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Eur Radiol. 28(12):5100-5110, 2018 Dec.
56. Nakazawa T, Watanabe Y, Hori Y, et al. Lung perfused blood volume images with dual-energy computed tomography for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: correlation to scintigraphy with single-photon emission computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011;35(5):590-595.
57. Nallasamy N, Bullen J, Karim W, Heresi GA, Renapurkar RD. Evaluation of Vascular Parameters in Patients With Pulmonary Thromboembolic Disease Using Dual-energy Computed Tomography. J Thorac Imaging. 34(6):367-372, 2019 Nov.
58. Tsutsumi Y, Iwano S, Okumura N, et al. Assessment of Severity in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension by Quantitative Parameters of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 44(4):578-585, 2020 Jul/Aug.
59. Abe N, Kato M, Kono M, et al. Right ventricular dimension index by cardiac magnetic resonance for prognostication in connective tissue diseases and pulmonary hypertension. Rheumatology (Oxford). 59(3):622-633, 2020 03 01.
60. Dellegrottaglie S, Ostenfeld E, Sanz J, Scatteia A, Perrone-Filardi P, Bossone E. Imaging the Right Heart-Pulmonary Circulation Unit: The Role of MRI and Computed Tomography. [Review]. Heart Fail Clin. 14(3):377-391, 2018 Jul.
61. Johns CS, Swift AJ, Rajaram S, et al. Lung perfusion: MRI vs. SPECT for screening in suspected chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. J Magn Reson Imaging. 46(6):1693-1697, 2017 12.
62. Lopez-Costa I, Bhalla S, Raptis C. Magnetic resonance imaging for pulmonary hypertension: methods, applications, and outcomes. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;23(1):43-50.
63. Iwasawa T. Diagnosis and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension using MR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2013;12(1):1-9.
64. Swift AJ, Rajaram S, Condliffe R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of right ventricular morphology and function in the assessment of suspected pulmonary hypertension results from the ASPIRE registry. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:40.
65. Francois CJ, Schiebler ML. Imaging of Pulmonary Hypertension. [Review]. Radiol Clin North Am. 54(6):1133-1149, 2016 Nov.
66. Ley S, Ley-Zaporozhan J, Pitton MB, et al. Diagnostic performance of state-of-the-art imaging techniques for morphological assessment of vascular abnormalities in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Eur Radiol. 22(3):607-16, 2012 Mar.
67. Swift AJ, Rajaram S, Capener D, et al. LGE patterns in pulmonary hypertension do not impact overall mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7:1209-17.
68. Reiter U, Reiter G, Kovacs G, et al. Native myocardial T1 mapping in pulmonary hypertension: correlations with cardiac function and hemodynamics. Eur Radiol. 27(1):157-166, 2017 Jan.
69. Saunders LC, Johns CS, Stewart NJ, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance native myocardial T1 mapping in patients with pulmonary hypertension. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 20(1):78, 2018 12 03.
70. Kreitner KF, Wirth GM, Krummenauer F, et al. Noninvasive assessment of pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension by high temporal resolution phase-contrast MRI: correlation with simultaneous invasive pressure recordings. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 6(5):722-9, 2013 Sep.
71. Wang HH, Tseng WI, Yu HY, Chang MC, Peng HH. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging for analyzing hemodynamic parameters and wall shear stress of pulmonary arteries in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Magma. 32(6):617-627, 2019 Dec.
72. Barker AJ, Roldan-Alzate A, Entezari P, et al. Four-dimensional flow assessment of pulmonary artery flow and wall shear stress in adult pulmonary arterial hypertension: results from two institutions. Magn Reson Med. 73(5):1904-13, 2015 May.
73. Odagiri K, Inui N, Miyakawa S, et al. Abnormal hemodynamics in the pulmonary artery seen on time-resolved 3-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (4D-flow) in a young patient with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circ J. 2014;78(7):1770-1772.
74. Roldan-Alzate A, Frydrychowicz A, Johnson KM, et al. Non-invasive assessment of cardiac function and pulmonary vascular resistance in an canine model of acute thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:23.
75. Meyer GMB, Spilimbergo FB, Altmayer S, et al. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension: Initial Experience of a One-Stop Study. Lung. 196(2):165-171, 2018 04.
76. Ray JC, Burger C, Mergo P, et al. Pulmonary arterial stiffness assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is a predictor of mild pulmonary arterial hypertension. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 35(10):1881-1892, 2019 Oct.
77. Johns CS, Rajaram S, Capener DA, et al. Non-invasive methods for estimating mPAP in COPD using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 28(4):1438-1448, 2018 Apr.
78. Pagnamenta A, Azzola A, Beghetti M, Lador F, On Behalf Of The Swiss Society Of Pulmonary Hypertension. Invasive haemodynamic evaluation of the pulmonary circulation in pulmonary hypertension. [Review]. Swiss Med Wkly. 147:w14445, 2017.
79. Rosenkranz S. Pulmonary hypertension: current diagnosis and treatment. Clin Res Cardiol. 2007; 96(8):527-541.
80. Tang WHW, Wilcox JD, Jacob MS, et al. Comprehensive Diagnostic Evaluation of Cardiovascular Physiology in Patients With Pulmonary Vascular Disease: Insights From the PVDOMICS Program. Circ. Heart fail.. 13(3):e006363, 2020 03.
81. Hoeper MM, Lee SH, Voswinckel R, et al. Complications of right heart catheterization procedures in patients with pulmonary hypertension in experienced centers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48(12):2546-2552.
82. Reichelt A, Hoeper MM, Galanski M, Keberle M. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: evaluation with 64-detector row CT versus digital substraction angiography. Eur J Radiol. 71(1):49-54, 2009 Jul.
83. Renapurkar RD, Shrikanthan S, Heresi GA, Lau CT, Gopalan D. Imaging in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension. [Review]. J Thorac Imaging. 32(2):71-88, 2017 Mar.
84. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction. Available at: https://edge.sitecorecloud.io/americancoldf5f-acrorgf92a-productioncb02-3650/media/ACR/Files/Clinical/Appropriateness-Criteria/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria-Radiation-Dose-Assessment-Introduction.pdf.
Disclaimer

The ACR Committee on Appropriateness Criteria and its expert panels have developed criteria for determining appropriate imaging examinations for diagnosis and treatment of specified medical condition(s). These criteria are intended to guide radiologists, radiation oncologists and referring physicians in making decisions regarding radiologic imaging and treatment. Generally, the complexity and severity of a patient’s clinical condition should dictate the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Only those examinations generally used for evaluation of the patient’s condition are ranked. Other imaging studies necessary to evaluate other co-existent diseases or other medical consequences of this condition are not considered in this document. The availability of equipment or personnel may influence the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Imaging techniques classified as investigational by the FDA have not been considered in developing these criteria; however, study of new equipment and applications should be encouraged. The ultimate decision regarding the appropriateness of any specific radiologic examination or treatment must be made by the referring physician and radiologist in light of all the circumstances presented in an individual examination.

Appendix 1. Updated Clinical Classification of Pulmonary Hypertension [2]