Postmenopausal Subacute or Chronic Pelvic Pain

Variant: 1 Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. Initial imaging.

Procedure	Appropriateness Category	Relative Radiation Level
US duplex Doppler pelvis	Usually Appropriate	O
US pelvis transabdominal	Usually Appropriate	O
US pelvis transabdominal and US pelvis transvaginal	Usually Appropriate	O
US pelvis transvaginal	Usually Appropriate	O
MRI pelvis without IV contrast	May Be Appropriate	O
Radiography abdomen and pelvis	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
MRI pelvis without and with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	O
CT pelvis with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CT pelvis without IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢
CT pelvis without and with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢☢

Variant: 2 Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. US indeterminate. Next imaging study.

Procedure	Appropriateness Category	Relative Radiation Level
MRI pelvis without and with IV contrast	Usually Appropriate	O
MRI pelvis without IV contrast	Usually Appropriate	O
CT pelvis with IV contrast	Usually Appropriate	☢☢☢
CT pelvis without IV contrast	May Be Appropriate	☢☢☢
CT pelvis without and with IV contrast	Usually Not Appropriate	☢☢☢☢

Panel Members

Kimberly L. Shampain, MD^a; Myra K. Feldman, MD^b; Adrian A. Dawkins, MD^c; Lee A. Learman, MD, PhD^d; Ekta Maheshwari, MBBS^e; Kira Melamud, MD^f; Krupa K. Patel-Lippmann, MD^g; Loretta M. Strachowski, MD^h; Angela Tong, MDⁱ; Wendaline VanBuren, MD^j; Ashish P. Wasnik, MD^k.

Summary of Literature Review

Introduction/Background

Initial Imaging Definition

Initial imaging is defined as imaging at the beginning of the care episode for the medical condition defined by the variant. More than one procedure can be considered usually appropriate in the initial imaging evaluation when:

There are procedures that are equivalent alternatives (i.e., only one procedure will be ordered to provide the clinical information to effectively manage the patient’s care)

There are complementary procedures (i.e., more than one procedure is ordered as a set or simultaneously wherein each procedure provides unique clinical information to effectively manage the patient’s care).

Discussion of Procedures by Variant

Variant 1:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. Initial imaging.

Variant 1:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. Initial imaging.
A. CT pelvis with IV contrast

Variant 1:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. Initial imaging.
B. CT pelvis without and with IV contrast

Variant 1:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. Initial imaging.
C. CT pelvis without IV contrast

Variant 1:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. Initial imaging.
D. MRI pelvis without and with IV contrast

Variant 1:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. Initial imaging.
E. MRI pelvis without IV contrast

Variant 1:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. Initial imaging.
F. Radiography abdomen and pelvis

Variant 1:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. Initial imaging.
G. US duplex Doppler pelvis

Variant 1:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. Initial imaging.
H. US pelvis transabdominal

Variant 1:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. Initial imaging.
I. US pelvis transabdominal and US pelvis transvaginal

Variant 1:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. Initial imaging.
J. US pelvis transvaginal

Variant 2:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. US indeterminate. Next imaging study.

Variant 2:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. US indeterminate. Next imaging study.
A. CT pelvis with IV contrast

Variant 2:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. US indeterminate. Next imaging study.
B. CT pelvis without and with IV contrast

Variant 2:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. US indeterminate. Next imaging study.
C. CT pelvis without IV contrast

Variant 2:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. US indeterminate. Next imaging study.
D. MRI pelvis without and with IV contrast

Variant 2:Adult postmenopausal female. Subacute or chronic pelvic pain. Suspected gynecologic etiologies. US indeterminate. Next imaging study.
E. MRI pelvis without IV contrast

Summary of Highlights

Supporting Documents

The evidence table, literature search, and appendix for this topic are available at https://acsearch.acr.org/list. The appendix includes the strength of evidence assessment and the final rating round tabulations for each recommendation.

For additional information on the Appropriateness Criteria methodology and other supporting documents, please go to the ACR website at https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Appropriateness-Criteria.

Gender Equality and Inclusivity Clause

The ACR acknowledges the limitations in applying inclusive language when citing research studies that predates the use of the current understanding of language inclusive of diversity in sex, intersex, gender, and gender-diverse people. The data variables regarding sex and gender used in the cited literature will not be changed. However, this guideline will use the terminology and definitions as proposed by the National Institutes of Health.

Appropriateness Category Names and Definitions

Appropriateness Category Name	Appropriateness Rating	Appropriateness Category Definition
Usually Appropriate	7, 8, or 9	The imaging procedure or treatment is indicated in the specified clinical scenarios at a favorable risk-benefit ratio for patients.
May Be Appropriate	4, 5, or 6	The imaging procedure or treatment may be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios as an alternative to imaging procedures or treatments with a more favorable risk-benefit ratio, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is equivocal.
May Be Appropriate (Disagreement)	5	The individual ratings are too dispersed from the panel median. The different label provides transparency regarding the panel’s recommendation. “May be appropriate” is the rating category and a rating of 5 is assigned.
Usually Not Appropriate	1, 2, or 3	The imaging procedure or treatment is unlikely to be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is likely to be unfavorable.

Relative Radiation Level Information

Potential adverse health effects associated with radiation exposure are an important factor to consider when selecting the appropriate imaging procedure. Because there is a wide range of radiation exposures associated with different diagnostic procedures, a relative radiation level (RRL) indication has been included for each imaging examination. The RRLs are based on effective dose, which is a radiation dose quantity that is used to estimate population total radiation risk associated with an imaging procedure. Patients in the pediatric age group are at inherently higher risk from exposure, because of both organ sensitivity and longer life expectancy (relevant to the long latency that appears to accompany radiation exposure). For these reasons, the RRL dose estimate ranges for pediatric examinations are lower as compared with those specified for adults (see Table below). Additional information regarding radiation dose assessment for imaging examinations can be found in the ACR Appropriateness Criteria^® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction document.

Relative Radiation Level Designations
Relative Radiation Level*	Adult Effective Dose Estimate Range	Pediatric Effective Dose Estimate Range
O	0 mSv	0 mSv
☢	<0.1 mSv	<0.03 mSv
☢☢	0.1-1 mSv	0.03-0.3 mSv
☢☢☢	1-10 mSv	0.3-3 mSv
☢☢☢☢	10-30 mSv	3-10 mSv
☢☢☢☢☢	30-100 mSv	10-30 mSv
*RRL assignments for some of the examinations cannot be made, because the actual patient doses in these procedures vary as a function of a number of factors (e.g., region of the body exposed to ionizing radiation, the imaging guidance that is used). The RRLs for these examinations are designated as “Varies.”

References

1.	Steege JJ, Siedhoff MM. Chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 124:616-629, .
2.	Bishop LA. Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology. 60(3):524-530, 2017 09.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 60(3):524-530, 2017 09.
3.	Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, Gulmezoglu M, Khan KS. WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:177.
4.	Daniels JP, Khan KS. Chronic pelvic pain in women. BMJ. 341:c4834, 2010 Oct 05.BMJ. 341:c4834, 2010 Oct 05.
5.	Ahangari A. Prevalence of chronic pelvic pain among women: an updated review. Pain Physician. 2014;17(2):E141-147.
6.	Henrichsen TL, Maturen KE, Robbins JB, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria R Postmenopausal Acute Pelvic Pain. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 18(5S):S119-S125, 2021 May.J. Am. Coll. Radiol.. 18(5S):S119-S125, 2021 May.
7.	Maturen KE, Akin EA, Dassel M, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria R Postmenopausal Subacute or Chronic Pelvic Pain. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 15(11S):S365-S372, 2018 Nov.J. Am. Coll. Radiol.. 15(11S):S365-S372, 2018 Nov.
8.	Somprasit C, Tanprasertkul C, Suwannarurk K, Pongrojpaw D, Chanthasenanont A, Bhamarapravatana K. Transvaginal color Doppler study of uterine artery: is there a role in chronic pelvic pain? J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(6):1174-1178.
9.	Bookwalter CA, VanBuren WM, Neisen MJ, Bjarnason H. Imaging Appearance and Nonsurgical Management of Pelvic Venous Congestion Syndrome. [Review]. Radiographics. 39(2):596-608, 2019 Mar-Apr.Radiographics. 39(2):596-608, 2019 Mar-Apr.
10.	Brahmbhatt A, Macher J, Shetty AN, Chughtai K, Baah NO, Dogra VS. Sonographic Evaluation of Pelvic Venous Disorders. [Review]. Ultrasound Quarterly. 37(3):219-228, 2021 Sep 01.ULTRASOUND Q.. 37(3):219-228, 2021 Sep 01.
11.	Cicchiello LA, Hamper UM, Scoutt LM. Ultrasound evaluation of gynecologic causes of pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2011;38(1):85-114, viii.
12.	Patel MD, Young SW, Dahiya N. Ultrasound of Pelvic Pain in the Nonpregnant Woman. [Review]. Radiologic Clinics of North America. 57(3):601-616, 2019 May.Radiol Clin North Am. 57(3):601-616, 2019 May.
13.	Amirbekian S, Hooley RJ. Ultrasound evaluation of pelvic pain. [Review]. Radiol Clin North Am. 52(6):1215-35, 2014 Nov.
14.	Reinhold C, Khalili I. Postmenopausal bleeding: value of imaging. [Review] [132 refs]. Radiol Clin North Am. 40(3):527-62, 2002 May.
15.	Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Bazot M. Gynecological pelvic infection: what is the role of imaging?. [Review]. Diagn Interv Imaging. 93(6):491-9, 2012 Jun.
16.	Tabibian N, Swehli E, Boyd A, Umbreen A, Tabibian JH. Abdominal adhesions: A practical review of an often overlooked entity. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017;15:9-13.
17.	Spens K, Bird L, Bright P. Transabdominal ultrasound: Can it be used to detect and quantify adhesions/reported pain, following Caesarean section? J Bodywork Mov Ther. 22(3):733-740, 2018 Jul.
18.	Bonney R, Revels JW, Wang SS, et al. A comprehensive radiologic review of abdominal and pelvic torsions. [Review]. Abdom Radiol. 46(6):2942-2960, 2021 06.
19.	Valentini AL, Gui B, Basilico R, Di Molfetta IV, Micco M, Bonomo L. Magnetic resonance imaging in women with pelvic pain from gynaecological causes: a pictorial review. [Review]. Radiol Med (Torino). 117(4):575-92, 2012 Jun.
20.	Juhan V. Chronic pelvic pain: An imaging approach. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging. 96(10):997-1007, 2015 Oct.Diagn Interv Imaging. 96(10):997-1007, 2015 Oct.
21.	American College of Radiology. Manual on Contrast Media. Available at: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Contrast-Manual.
22.	Kuligowska E, Deeds L, 3rd, Lu K, 3rd. Pelvic pain: overlooked and underdiagnosed gynecologic conditions. Radiographics. 2005;25(1):3-20.
23.	Hwang JH, Oh MJ, Lee NW, Hur JY, Lee KW, Lee JK. Multiple vaginal mullerian cysts: a case report and review of literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;280(1):137-139.
24.	Surabhi VR, Menias CO, George V, Siegel CL, Prasad SR. Magnetic resonance imaging of female urethral and periurethral disorders. [Review]. Radiol Clin North Am. 51(6):941-53, 2013 Nov.
25.	Cope AG, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Famuyide AO, Gebhart JB, Hopkins MR, Breitkopf DM. Clinical Manifestations and Outcomes in Surgically Managed Gartner Duct Cysts. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 24(3):473-477, 2017 Mar - Apr.
26.	Osman AM, Mordi A, Khattab R. Female pelvic congestion syndrome: how can CT and MRI help in the management decision?. British Journal of Radiology. 94(1118):20200881, 2021 Feb 01.Br J Radiol. 94(1118):20200881, 2021 Feb 01.
27.	Topper SR, Winokur RS. Imaging of Pelvic Venous Disorders (PeVD); Should Every Patient Get an MRI?. [Review]. Techniques in Vascular & Interventional Radiology. 24(1):100731, 2021 Mar.Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 24(1):100731, 2021 Mar.
28.	Shahat M, Abdelbaqy OMA, AbdelHakam AM, Ali SH, Attalla K. Can cross-sectional imaging replace diagnostic venography in pelvic venous disorder (PeVD)? J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 12(2):101724, 2024 Mar.
29.	Basile A, Failla G, Gozzo C. Pelvic Congestion Syndrome. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2021 Feb;42(1):S0887-2171(20)30082-2.
30.	Tirlapur SA, Daniels JP, Khan KS. Chronic pelvic pain: how does noninvasive imaging compare with diagnostic laparoscopy?. [Review]. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 27(6):445-8, 2015 Dec.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 27(6):445-8, 2015 Dec.
31.	Silva PD, Suarez SA. A Case of Disabling Urinary Frequency and Pelvic Pain Due to Postoperative Uterine Adhesions. WMJ. 115(1):43-5, 2016 Feb.WMJ. 115(1):43-5, 2016 Feb.
32.	Szaflarski D, Sosner E, French TD, et al. Evaluating the frequency and severity of ovarian venous congestion on adult computed tomography. Abdom Radiol. 44(1):259-263, 2019 01.

Appendix 1. Related ACR Appropriateness Criteria Topics

Disclaimer

The ACR Committee on Appropriateness Criteria and its expert panels have developed criteria for determining appropriate imaging examinations for diagnosis and treatment of specified medical condition(s). These criteria are intended to guide radiologists, radiation oncologists and referring physicians in making decisions regarding radiologic imaging and treatment. Generally, the complexity and severity of a patient’s clinical condition should dictate the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Only those examinations generally used for evaluation of the patient’s condition are ranked. Other imaging studies necessary to evaluate other co-existent diseases or other medical consequences of this condition are not considered in this document. The availability of equipment or personnel may influence the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Imaging techniques classified as investigational by the FDA have not been considered in developing these criteria; however, study of new equipment and applications should be encouraged. The ultimate decision regarding the appropriateness of any specific radiologic examination or treatment must be made by the referring physician and radiologist in light of all the circumstances presented in an individual examination.