Transgender Breast Cancer Screening
Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
Digital breast tomosynthesis screening | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢ |
Mammography screening | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢ |
US breast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
MRI breast without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
MRI breast without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
Digital breast tomosynthesis screening | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢ |
Mammography screening | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢ |
US breast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
MRI breast without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
MRI breast without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
US breast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
Digital breast tomosynthesis screening | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢ |
Mammography screening | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢ |
MRI breast without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
MRI breast without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
Digital breast tomosynthesis screening | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢ |
Mammography screening | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢ |
US breast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
MRI breast without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
MRI breast without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
US breast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
Digital breast tomosynthesis screening | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢ |
Mammography screening | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢ |
MRI breast without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
MRI breast without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
Digital breast tomosynthesis screening | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢ |
Mammography screening | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢ |
US breast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
MRI breast without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
MRI breast without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
Digital breast tomosynthesis screening | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢ |
Mammography screening | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢ |
US breast | May Be Appropriate | O |
MRI breast without and with IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | O |
MRI breast without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
Digital breast tomosynthesis screening | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢ |
Mammography screening | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢ |
MRI breast without and with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | O |
US breast | May Be Appropriate | O |
MRI breast without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
A. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening
B. Mammography Screening
C. MRI Breast Without and With IV Contrast
D. MRI Breast Without IV Contrast
E. US Breast
A. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening
B. Mammography Screening
C. MRI Breast Without and With IV Contrast
D. MRI Breast Without IV Contrast
E. US Breast
A. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening
B. Mammography Screening
C. MRI Breast Without and With IV Contrast
D. MRI Breast Without IV Contrast
E. US Breast
A. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening
B. Mammography Screening
C. MRI Breast Without and With IV Contrast
D. MRI Breast Without IV Contrast
E. US Breast
A. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening
B. Mammography Screening
C. MRI Breast Without and With IV Contrast
D. MRI Breast Without IV Contrast
E. US Breast
A. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening
B. Mammography Screening
C. MRI Breast Without and With IV Contrast
D. MRI Breast Without IV Contrast
E. US Breast
A. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening
B. Mammography Screening
C. MRI Breast Without and With IV Contrast
D. MRI Breast Without IV Contrast
E. US Breast
A. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening
B. Mammography Screening
C. MRI Breast Without and With IV Contrast
D. MRI Breast Without IV Contrast
E. US Breast
The evidence table, literature search, and appendix for this topic are available at https://acsearch.acr.org/list. The appendix includes the strength of evidence assessment and the final rating round tabulations for each recommendation.
For additional information on the Appropriateness Criteria methodology and other supporting documents, please go to the ACR website at https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Appropriateness-Criteria.
Appropriateness Category Name |
Appropriateness Rating |
Appropriateness Category Definition |
Usually Appropriate |
7, 8, or 9 |
The imaging procedure or treatment is indicated in the specified clinical scenarios at a favorable risk-benefit ratio for patients. |
May Be Appropriate |
4, 5, or 6 |
The imaging procedure or treatment may be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios as an alternative to imaging procedures or treatments with a more favorable risk-benefit ratio, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is equivocal. |
May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) |
5 |
The individual ratings are too dispersed from the panel median. The different label provides transparency regarding the panel’s recommendation. “May be appropriate” is the rating category and a rating of 5 is assigned. |
Usually Not Appropriate |
1, 2, or 3 |
The imaging procedure or treatment is unlikely to be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is likely to be unfavorable. |
1. | Brown GR, Jones KT. Incidence of breast cancer in a cohort of 5,135 transgender veterans. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 149(1):191-8, 2015 Jan. | |
2. | de Blok CJM, Wiepjes CM, Nota NM, et al. Breast cancer risk in transgender people receiving hormone treatment: nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. BMJ. 365:l1652, 2019 05 14. | |
3. | Gooren LJ, van Trotsenburg MA, Giltay EJ, van Diest PJ. Breast cancer development in transsexual subjects receiving cross-sex hormone treatment. J Sex Med. 10(12):3129-34, 2013 Dec. | |
4. | Maglione KD, Margolies L, Jaffer S, et al. Breast cancer in male-to-female transsexuals: use of breast imaging for detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 203(6):W735-40, 2014 Dec. | |
5. | Stone JP, Hartley RL, Temple-Oberle C. Breast cancer in transgender patients: A systematic review. Part 2: Female to Male. [Review]. Eur J Surg Oncol. 44(10):1463-1468, 2018 10. | |
6. | Joint R, Chen ZE, Cameron S. Breast and reproductive cancers in the transgender population: a systematic review. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 125(12):1505-1512, 2018 Nov. | |
7. | Hembree WC, Cohen-Kettenis PT, Gooren L, et al. Endocrine Treatment of Gender-Dysphoric/Gender-Incongruent Persons: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017;102:3869-903. | |
8. | Phillips J, Fein-Zachary VJ, Mehta TS, Littlehale N, Venkataraman S, Slanetz PJ. Breast imaging in the transgender patient. [Review]. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 202(5):1149-56, 2014 May. | |
9. | Kanhai RC, Hage JJ, Mulder JW. Long-term outcome of augmentation mammaplasty in male-to-female transsexuals: a questionnaire survey of 107 patients. Br J Plast Surg. 53(3):209-11, 2000 Apr. | |
10. | Sonnenblick EB, Shah AD, Goldstein Z, Reisman T. Breast Imaging of Transgender Individuals: A Review. [Review]. Curr. radiol. rep.. 6(1):1, 2018. | |
11. | Weyers S, Villeirs G, Vanherreweghe E, et al. Mammography and breast sonography in transsexual women. Eur J Radiol. 74(3):508-13, 2010 Jun. | |
12. | Hartley RL, Stone JP, Temple-Oberle C. Breast cancer in transgender patients: A systematic review. Part 1: Male to female. [Review]. Eur J Surg Oncol. 44(10):1455-1462, 2018 10. | |
13. | Nota NM, Dekker MJHJ, Klaver M, et al. Prolactin levels during short- and long-term cross-sex hormone treatment: an observational study in transgender persons. Andrologia. 49(6), 2017 Aug. | |
14. | Moy L, Heller SL, Bailey L, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Palpable Breast Masses. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14:S203-S24. | |
15. | Holbrook AI, Moy L, Akin EA, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Breast Pain. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15:S276-S82. | |
16. | Expert Panel on Breast Imaging:, Lee SJ, Trikha S, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria R Evaluation of Nipple Discharge. [Review]. J. Am. Coll. Radiol.. 14(5S):S138-S153, 2017 May. | |
17. | Lourenco AP, Moy L, Baron P, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria R Breast Implant Evaluation. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 15(5S):S13-S25, 2018 May.J. Am. Coll. Radiol.. 15(5S):S13-S25, 2018 May. | |
18. | Asscheman H, Giltay EJ, Megens JA, de Ronde WP, van Trotsenburg MA, Gooren LJ. A long-term follow-up study of mortality in transsexuals receiving treatment with cross-sex hormones. EUR. J. ENDOCRINOL.. 164(4):635-42, 2011 Apr. | |
19. | Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, et al. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. JAMA. 280(7):605-13, 1998 Aug 19. | |
20. | Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 288(3):321-33, 2002 Jul 17. | |
21. | Teoh ZH, Archampong D, Gate T. Breast cancer in male-to-female (MtF) transgender patients: is hormone receptor negativity a feature?. BMJ Case Rep. 2015, 2015 May 20. | |
22. | Gao Y, Goldberg JE, Young TK, Babb JS, Moy L, Heller SL. Breast Cancer Screening in High-Risk Men: A 12-year Longitudinal Observational Study of Male Breast Imaging Utilization and Outcomes. Radiology. 293(2):282-291, 2019 11. | |
23. | Marino MA, Gucalp A, Leithner D, et al. Mammographic screening in male patients at high risk for breast cancer: is it worth it?. Breast Cancer Research & Treatment. 177(3):705-711, 2019 Oct. | |
24. | Colebunders B, T'Sjoen G, Weyers S, Monstrey S. Hormonal and surgical treatment in trans-women with BRCA1 mutations: a controversial topic. J Sex Med. 11(10):2496-9, 2014 Oct. | |
25. | Mainiero MB, Moy L, Baron P, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Breast Cancer Screening. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14:S383-S90. | |
26. | Gethins M.. Breast cancer in men. J Natl Cancer Inst. 104(6):436-8, 2012 Mar 21. | |
27. | Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Lynch HT, et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 22(6):1055-62, 2004 Mar 15. | |
28. | American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria®: Imaging after Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction. Available at: https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/3155410/Narrative/. | |
29. | Gartlehner G, Thaler KJ, Chapman A, et al. Adjunct ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk: a systematic review. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2013;11(2):87-93. | |
30. | Winkler NS, Raza S, Mackesy M, Birdwell RL. Breast density: clinical implications and assessment methods. Radiographics. 2015;35(2):316-324. | |
31. | Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, et al. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(1):18-27. | |
32. | Brem RF, Tabar L, Duffy SW, et al. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study. Radiology. 274(3):663-73, 2015 Mar. | |
33. | Chae EY, Kim HH, Cha JH, Shin HJ, Kim H. Evaluation of screening whole-breast sonography as a supplemental tool in conjunction with mammography in women with dense breasts. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32(9):1573-1578. | |
34. | Giuliano V, Giuliano C. Improved breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women using 3D-automated breast ultrasound in mammographically dense breasts. Clin Imaging 2013;37:480-6. | |
35. | Monticciolo DL, Newell MS, Hendrick RE, et al. Breast Cancer Screening for Average-Risk Women: Recommendations From the ACR Commission on Breast Imaging. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 14(9):1137-1143, 2017 Sep. | |
36. | Friedlander LC, Roth SO, Gavenonis SC. Results of MR imaging screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with lobular carcinoma in situ. Radiology. 261(2):421-7, 2011 Nov. | |
37. | Sung JS, Malak SF, Bajaj P, Alis R, Dershaw DD, Morris EA. Screening breast MR imaging in women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ. Radiology. 261(2):414-20, 2011 Nov. | |
38. | Brennan S, Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Morris E. Breast MRI screening of women with a personal history of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(2):510-516. | |
39. | Lehman CD, Lee JM, DeMartini WB, et al. Screening MRI in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 108(3), 2016 Mar. | |
40. | Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008;299(18):2151-2163. | |
41. | Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA. 307(13):1394-404, 2012 Apr 04. | |
42. | Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(2):75-89. | |
43. | Hagen AI, Kvistad KA, Maehle L, et al. Sensitivity of MRI versus conventional screening in the diagnosis of BRCA-associated breast cancer in a national prospective series. Breast. 2007;16(4):367-374. | |
44. | Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C, et al. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Cancer. 2006;106(11):2318-2326. | |
45. | Kuhl C, Weigel S, Schrading S, Arand B, Bieling H, König R, Tombach B, Leutner C, Rieber-Brambs A, Nordhoff D, Heindel W, Reiser M, Schild HH. Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 20;28(9):1450-7. | |
46. | Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(33):8469-8476. | |
47. | Leach MO, Boggis CR, Dixon AK, et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet. 2005;365(9473):1769-1778. | |
48. | Saadatmand S, Vos JR, Hooning MJ, et al. Relevance and efficacy of breast cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers above 60 years: a national cohort study. Int J Cancer. 135(12):2940-9, 2014 Dec 15. | |
49. | Sardanelli F, Podo F, D'Agnolo G, et al. Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology. 242(3):698-715, 2007 Mar. | |
50. | Weinstein SP, Localio AR, Conant EF, Rosen M, Thomas KM, Schnall MD. Multimodality screening of high-risk women: a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6124-8. | |
51. | American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction. Available at: https://edge.sitecorecloud.io/americancoldf5f-acrorgf92a-productioncb02-3650/media/ACR/Files/Clinical/Appropriateness-Criteria/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria-Radiation-Dose-Assessment-Introduction.pdf. |