Hydronephrosis on Prior Imaging-Unknown Cause
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| MRU without and with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | O |
| MAG3 renal scan | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CTU without and with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| US color Doppler kidneys and bladder retroperitoneal | May Be Appropriate | O |
| MRU without IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | O |
| CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast | May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| DTPA renal scan | May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) | ☢☢☢ |
| US abdomen | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| Fluoroscopy voiding cystourethrography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢ |
| Fluoroscopy antegrade pyelography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Radiography abdomen and pelvis | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Radiography intravenous urography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| MRI abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI abdomen without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI abdomen without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| CT abdomen with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| MRU without and with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | O |
| MAG3 renal scan | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| MRU without IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | O |
| CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast | May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| DTPA renal scan | May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) | ☢☢☢ |
| CTU without and with IV contrast | May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) | ☢☢☢☢ |
| US abdomen | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| US color Doppler kidneys and bladder retroperitoneal | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| Fluoroscopy voiding cystourethrography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢ |
| Fluoroscopy antegrade pyelography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Radiography abdomen and pelvis | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Radiography intravenous urography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| MRI abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI abdomen without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI abdomen without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| CT abdomen with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| US color Doppler kidneys and bladder retroperitoneal | Usually Appropriate | O |
| MRU without and with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | O |
| MAG3 renal scan | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CTU without and with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| US abdomen | May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) | O |
| MRI abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | O |
| MRI abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | O |
| MRU without IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | O |
| CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| DTPA renal scan | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Fluoroscopy voiding cystourethrography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢ |
| Fluoroscopy antegrade pyelography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Radiography abdomen and pelvis | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Radiography intravenous urography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| MRI abdomen without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI abdomen without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| CT abdomen with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| US color Doppler kidneys and bladder retroperitoneal | Usually Appropriate | O |
| US abdomen | May Be Appropriate | O |
| MRI abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast | May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) | O |
| MRU without IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | O |
| Fluoroscopy voiding cystourethrography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢ |
| Fluoroscopy antegrade pyelography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Radiography abdomen and pelvis | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Radiography intravenous urography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| MRI abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI abdomen without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI abdomen without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRU without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| DTPA renal scan | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| MAG3 renal scan | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CTU without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| US color Doppler kidneys and bladder retroperitoneal | Usually Appropriate | O |
| MRU without IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | O |
| US abdomen | May Be Appropriate | O |
| MRI abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | O |
| CT abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Fluoroscopy voiding cystourethrography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢ |
| Fluoroscopy antegrade pyelography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Radiography abdomen and pelvis | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Radiography intravenous urography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| MRI abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI abdomen without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI abdomen without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRU without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| DTPA renal scan | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| MAG3 renal scan | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT abdomen without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CTU without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
Initial imaging is defined as imaging at the beginning of the care episode for the medical condition defined by the variant. More than one procedure can be considered usually appropriate in the initial imaging evaluation when:
- There are procedures that are equivalent alternatives (i.e., only one procedure will be ordered to provide the clinical information to effectively manage the patient’s care)
OR
- There are complementary procedures (i.e., more than one procedure is ordered as a set or simultaneously wherein each procedure provides unique clinical information to effectively manage the patient’s care).
A. CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast
B. CT abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast
C. CT abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast
D. CT abdomen with IV contrast
E. CT abdomen without and with IV contrast
F. CT abdomen without IV contrast
G. CTU without and with IV contrast
H. DTPA renal scan
I. Fluoroscopy antegrade pyelography
J. Fluoroscopy voiding cystourethrography
K. MAG3 renal scan
L. MRI abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast
M. MRI abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast
N. MRI abdomen without and with IV contrast
O. MRI abdomen without IV contrast
P. MRU without and with IV contrast
Q. MRU without IV contrast
R. Radiography abdomen and pelvis
S. Radiography intravenous urography
T. US abdomen
U. US color Doppler kidneys and bladder retroperitoneal
A. CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast
B. CT abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast
C. CT abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast
D. CT abdomen with IV contrast
E. CT abdomen without and with IV contrast
F. CT abdomen without IV contrast
G. CTU without and with IV contrast
H. DTPA renal scan
I. Fluoroscopy antegrade pyelography
J. Fluoroscopy voiding cystourethrography
K. MAG3 renal scan
L. MRI abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast
M. MRI abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast
N. MRI abdomen without and with IV contrast
O. MRI abdomen without IV contrast
P. MRU without and with IV contrast
Q. MRU without IV contrast
R. Radiography abdomen and pelvis
S. Radiography intravenous urography
T. US abdomen
U. US color Doppler kidneys and bladder retroperitoneal
A. CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast
B. CT abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast
C. CT abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast
D. CT abdomen with IV contrast
E. CT abdomen without and with IV contrast
F. CT abdomen without IV contrast
G. CTU without and with IV contrast
H. DTPA renal scan
I. Fluoroscopy antegrade pyelography
J. Fluoroscopy voiding cystourethrography
K. MAG3 renal scan
L. MRI abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast
M. MRI abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast
N. MRI abdomen without and with IV contrast
O. MRI abdomen without IV contrast
P. MRU without and with IV contrast
Q. MRU without IV contrast
R. Radiography abdomen and pelvis
S. Radiography intravenous urography
T. US abdomen
U. US color Doppler kidneys and bladder retroperitoneal
A. CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast
B. CT abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast
C. CT abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast
D. CT abdomen with IV contrast
E. CT abdomen without and with IV contrast
F. CT abdomen without IV contrast
G. CTU without and with IV contrast
H. DTPA renal scan
I. Fluoroscopy antegrade pyelography
J. Fluoroscopy voiding cystourethrography
K. MAG3 renal scan
L. MRI abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast
M. MRI abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast
N. MRI abdomen without and with IV contrast
O. MRI abdomen without IV contrast
P. MRU without and with IV contrast
Q. MRU without IV contrast
R. Radiography abdomen and pelvis
S. Radiography intravenous urography
T. US abdomen
U. US color Doppler kidneys and bladder retroperitoneal
A. CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast
B. CT abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast
C. CT abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast
D. CT abdomen with IV contrast
E. CT abdomen without and with IV contrast
F. CT abdomen without IV contrast
G. CTU without and with IV contrast
H. DTPA renal scan
I. Fluoroscopy antegrade pyelography
J. Fluoroscopy voiding cystourethrography
K. MAG3 renal scan
L. MRI abdomen and pelvis without and with IV contrast
M. MRI abdomen and pelvis without IV contrast
N. MRI abdomen without and with IV contrast
O. MRI abdomen without IV contrast
P. MRU without and with IV contrast
Q. MRU without IV contrast
R. Radiography abdomen and pelvis
S. Radiography intravenous urography
T. US abdomen
U. US color Doppler kidneys and bladder retroperitoneal
The evidence table, literature search, and appendix for this topic are available at https://acsearch.acr.org/list. The appendix includes the strength of evidence assessment and the final rating round tabulations for each recommendation.
For additional information on the Appropriateness Criteria methodology and other supporting documents, please go to the ACR website at https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Appropriateness-Criteria.
Imaging of the pregnant patient can be challenging, particularly with respect to minimizing radiation exposure and risk. For further information and guidance, see the following ACR documents:
· ACR–SPR Practice Parameter for the Safe and Optimal Performance of Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
· ACR-SPR Practice Parameter for Imaging Pregnant or Potentially Pregnant Patients with Ionizing Radiation
· ACR-ACOG-AIUM-SMFM-SRU Practice Parameter for the Performance of Standard Diagnostic Obstetrical Ultrasound
· ACR Manual on Contrast Media
· ACR Manual on MR Safety
|
Appropriateness Category Name |
Appropriateness Rating |
Appropriateness Category Definition |
|
Usually Appropriate |
7, 8, or 9 |
The imaging procedure or treatment is indicated in the specified clinical scenarios at a favorable risk-benefit ratio for patients. |
|
May Be Appropriate |
4, 5, or 6 |
The imaging procedure or treatment may be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios as an alternative to imaging procedures or treatments with a more favorable risk-benefit ratio, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is equivocal. |
|
May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) |
5 |
The individual ratings are too dispersed from the panel median. The different label provides transparency regarding the panel’s recommendation. “May be appropriate” is the rating category and a rating of 5 is assigned. |
|
Usually Not Appropriate |
1, 2, or 3 |
The imaging procedure or treatment is unlikely to be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is likely to be unfavorable. |
Potential adverse health effects associated with radiation exposure are an important factor to consider when selecting the appropriate imaging procedure. Because there is a wide range of radiation exposures associated with different diagnostic procedures, a relative radiation level (RRL) indication has been included for each imaging examination. The RRLs are based on effective dose, which is a radiation dose quantity that is used to estimate population total radiation risk associated with an imaging procedure. Patients in the pediatric age group are at inherently higher risk from exposure, because of both organ sensitivity and longer life expectancy (relevant to the long latency that appears to accompany radiation exposure). For these reasons, the RRL dose estimate ranges for pediatric examinations are lower as compared with those specified for adults (see Table below). Additional information regarding radiation dose assessment for imaging examinations can be found in the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction document.
|
Relative Radiation Level Designations |
||
|
Relative Radiation Level* |
Adult Effective Dose Estimate Range |
Pediatric Effective Dose Estimate Range |
|
O |
0 mSv |
0 mSv |
|
☢ |
<0.1 mSv |
<0.03 mSv |
|
☢☢ |
0.1-1 mSv |
0.03-0.3 mSv |
|
☢☢☢ |
1-10 mSv |
0.3-3 mSv |
|
☢☢☢☢ |
10-30 mSv |
3-10 mSv |
|
☢☢☢☢☢ |
30-100 mSv |
10-30 mSv |
|
*RRL assignments for some of the examinations cannot be made, because the actual patient doses in these procedures vary as a function of a number of factors (e.g., region of the body exposed to ionizing radiation, the imaging guidance that is used). The RRLs for these examinations are designated as “Varies.” |
||
| 1. | Patel K, Batura D. An overview of hydronephrosis in adults. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 81(1):1-8, 2020 Jan 02. | |
| 2. | Zambon JP, Koslov DS, Mihai B, Badlani GH. Bladder and Ureteral Dysfunction Leading to Hydronephrosis and Hydroureteronephrosis in Adults. [Review]. Urology. 117:1-8, 2018 07. | |
| 3. | Idowu BM, Ibitoye BO, Oyedepo VO, Onigbinde SO, Okedere TA. Ultrasonographic characterisation of obstructive uropathy in Nigerian women with uterine fibroids. Niger Postgrad Med J. 25(4):220-224, 2018 Oct-Dec. | |
| 4. | Pepe F, Pepe P. Color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) in the diagnosis of obstructive hydronephrosis in pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 288(3):489-93, 2013 Sep. | |
| 5. | Bayraktar Z, Kahraman ST, Alac ES, Yengel I, Sarikaya Kalkan D. Maternal hydronephrosis in pregnant women without ureteral stones and characteristics of symptomatic cases who need treatment: A single-center prospective study with 1026 pregnant women. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 93(1):35-41, 2021 Mar 18. | |
| 6. | Blanco LT, Socarras MR, Montero RF, et al. Renal colic during pregnancy: Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. Literature review. [Review]. Cent. European J. Urol.. 70(1):93-100, 2017. | |
| 7. | Cecen K, Ulker K. The comparison of double J stent insertion and conservative treatment alone in severe pure gestational hydronephrosis: a case controlled clinical study. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014:989173, 2014. | |
| 8. | Cheung KL, Lafayette RA. Renal physiology of pregnancy. [Review]. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 20(3):209-14, 2013 May. | |
| 9. | Ercil H, Arslan B, Ortoglu F, et al. Conservative/surgical treatment predictors of maternal hydronephrosis: results of a single-center retrospective non-randomized non-controlled observational study. Int Urol Nephrol. 49(8):1347-1352, 2017 Aug. | |
| 10. | Ozayar A, Friedlander JI, Shakir NA, Gahan JC, Cadeddu JA, Morgan MS. Equivocal ureteropelvic junction obstruction on diuretic renogram--should minimally invasive pyeloplasty be offered to symptomatic patients?. J Urol. 193(4):1278-82, 2015 Apr. | |
| 11. | Taylor AT. Radionuclides in nephrourology, Part 2: pitfalls and diagnostic applications. [Review]. J Nucl Med. 55(5):786-98, 2014 May. | |
| 12. | O'Reilly P, Aurell M, Britton K, Kletter K, Rosenthal L, Testa T. Consensus on diuresis renography for investigating the dilated upper urinary tract. Radionuclides in Nephrourology Group. Consensus Committee on Diuresis Renography. J Nucl Med 1996;37:1872-6. | |
| 13. | Wang YC, Chang D, Zhang SJ, Wang Q, Ju S. The Accuracy of Renal Function Measurements in Obstructive Hydronephrosis Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Renography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 213(4):859-866, 2019 10. | |
| 14. | Claudon M, Durand E, Grenier N, et al. Chronic urinary obstruction: evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR urography for measurement of split renal function. Radiology. 273(3):801-12, 2014 Dec. | |
| 15. | O'Connor OJ, McLaughlin P, Maher MM. MR Urography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:W201-6. | |
| 16. | Innes GD, Scheuermeyer FX, McRae AD, Teichman JMH, Lane DJ. Hydronephrosis severity clarifies prognosis and guides management for emergency department patients with acute ureteral colic. CJEM Canadian Journal of Emergency Medical Care. 23(5):687-695, 2021 09.CJEM, Can. j. emerg. med. care. 23(5):687-695, 2021 09. | |
| 17. | Alabousi A, Patlas MN, Mellnick VM, Chernyak V, Farshait N, Katz DS. Renal Colic Imaging: Myths, Recent Trends, and Controversies. [Review]. Can Assoc Radiol J. 70(2):164-171, 2019 May. | |
| 18. | Qin L, Xu J, Tang Y, et al. Value of noncontrast computer tomography in predicting the characteristics of obstructive uropathy. Clin Imaging. 82:53-57, 2022 Feb. | |
| 19. | Yuruk E, Tuken M, Sulejman S, et al. Computerized tomography attenuation values can be used to differentiate hydronephrosis from pyonephrosis. World J Urol. 35(3):437-442, 2017 Mar. | |
| 20. | Desai V, Cox M, Deshmukh S, Roth CG. Contrast-enhanced or noncontrast CT for renal colic: utilizing urinalysis and patient history of urolithiasis to decide. Emergency Radiology. 25(5):455-460, 2018 Oct.EMERG. RADIOL.. 25(5):455-460, 2018 Oct. | |
| 21. | Zwank MD, Ho BM, Gresback D, Stuck LH, Salzman JG, Woster WR. Does computed tomographic scan affect diagnosis and management of patients with suspected renal colic?. Am J Emerg Med. 32(4):367-70, 2014 Apr. | |
| 22. | Pathan SA, Mitra B, Mirza S, et al. Emergency Physician Interpretation of Point-of-care Ultrasound for Identifying and Grading of Hydronephrosis in Renal Colic Compared With Consensus Interpretation by Emergency Radiologists. Acad Emerg Med. 25(10):1129-1137, 2018 10. | |
| 23. | Daniels B, Gross CP, Molinaro A, et al. STONE PLUS: Evaluation of Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Renal Colic, Using a Clinical Prediction Tool Combined With Point-of-Care Limited Ultrasonography. Ann Emerg Med. 67(4):439-48, 2016 Apr. | |
| 24. | Ali A, Akram F, Hussain S, Janan Z, Hussain Gillani SY. Non-Contrast Enhanced Multi-Slice Ct-Kub In Renal Colic: Spectrum Of Abnormalities Detected On Ct Kub And Assessment Of Referral Patterns. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad: JAMC. 31(3):415-417, 2019 Jul-Sep.J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 31(3):415-417, 2019 Jul-Sep. | |
| 25. | Leo MM, Langlois BK, Pare JR, et al. Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Severity of Hydronephrosis and Its Importance in Renal Colic. West J Emerg Med. 18(4):559-568, 2017 Jun. | |
| 26. | Saw JT, Imeri NN, Aldridge ES, Buntine PG. Predictive values of haematuria and hydronephrosis in suspected renal colic: An emergency department retrospective audit. Emerg Med Australas. 32(4):573-577, 2020 08. | |
| 27. | Lotan E, Weissman O, Guranda L, et al. Can Unenhanced CT Findings Predict Interventional Versus Conservative Treatment in Acute Renal Colic?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 207(5):1016-1021, 2016 Nov. | |
| 28. | Bafaraj SM. Value of Magnetic Resonance Urography Versus Computerized Tomography Urography (CTU) in Evaluation of Obstructive Uropathy: An Observational Study. Curr Med Imaging Rev. 14(1):129-134, 2018 Feb. | |
| 29. | Masselli G, Derme M, Bernieri MG, et al. Stone disease in pregnancy: imaging-guided therapy. Insights Imaging 2014;5:691-6. | |
| 30. | Muthusami P, Bhuvaneswari V, Elangovan S, Dorairajan LN, Ramesh A. The role of static magnetic resonance urography in the evaluation of obstructive uropathy. Urology. 81(3):623-7, 2013 Mar. | |
| 31. | Semins MJ, Feng Z, Trock B, Bohlman M, Hosek W, Matlaga BR. Evaluation of acute renal colic: a comparison of non-contrast CT versus 3-T non-contrast HASTE MR urography. Urolithiasis. 41(1):43-6, 2013 Feb. | |
| 32. | Innes GD, Wishart I, Lau T, Islam A, Gourlay K, Scheuermeyer FX. Can plain film radiography improve the emergency department detection of clinically important urinary stones?. Am J Emerg Med. 50:449-454, 2021 Dec. | |
| 33. | Abdel-Gawad M, Kadasne R, Anjikar C, Elsobky E. Value of Color Doppler ultrasound, kub and urinalysis in diagnosis of renal colic due to ureteral stones. Int Braz J Urol. 40(4):513-9, 2014 Jul-Aug. | |
| 34. | Dalziel PJ, Noble VE. Bedside ultrasound and the assessment of renal colic: a review. [Review]. Emerg Med J. 30(1):3-8, 2013 Jan. | |
| 35. | Faget C, Millet I, Sebbane M, et al. Imaging strategies for patients with suspicion of uncomplicated colic pain: diagnostic accuracy and management assessment. Eur Radiol. 31(5):2983-2993, 2021 May. | |
| 36. | Wong C, Teitge B, Ross M, Young P, Robertson HL, Lang E. The Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Point-of-care Ultrasound for Nephrolithiasis in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 25(6):684-698, 2018 06. | |
| 37. | Riddell J, Case A, Wopat R, et al. Sensitivity of emergency bedside ultrasound to detect hydronephrosis in patients with computed tomography-proven stones. West J Emerg Med. 15(1):96-100, 2014 Feb. | |
| 38. | Taylor M, Woo MY, Pageau P, et al. Ultrasonography for the prediction of urological surgical intervention in patients with renal colic. Emerg Med J. 33(2):118-23, 2016 Feb. | |
| 39. | Joshi KS, Karki S, Regmi S, Joshi HN, Adhikari SP. Sonography in acute ureteric colic: an experience in Dhulikhel Hospital. Kathmandu Univ. med. j.. 12(45):9-15, 2014 Jan-Mar. | |
| 40. | Sternberg KM, Pais VM Jr, Larson T, Han J, Hernandez N, Eisner B. Is Hydronephrosis on Ultrasound Predictive of Ureterolithiasis in Patients with Renal Colic?. J Urol. 196(4):1149-52, 2016 Oct. | |
| 41. | Jandaghi AB, Falahatkar S, Alizadeh A, et al. Assessment of ureterovesical jet dynamics in obstructed ureter by urinary stone with color Doppler and duplex Doppler examinations. Urolithiasis. 41(2):159-63, 2013 Apr. | |
| 42. | Bird ST, Gelperin K, Sahin L, et al. First-Trimester Exposure to Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents: A Utilization Study of 4.6 Million U.S. Pregnancies. Radiology 2019;293:193-200. | |
| 43. | Farrington CA. Kidney Imaging and Biopsy in Pregnancy. [Review]. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 27(6):525-530, 2020 11. | |
| 44. | Spencer JA, Chahal R, Kelly A, Taylor K, Eardley I, Lloyd SN. Evaluation of painful hydronephrosis in pregnancy: magnetic resonance urographic patterns in physiological dilatation versus calculous obstruction. J Urol. 2004;171(1):256-260. | |
| 45. | Demir M, Yagmur I, Pelit ES, Kati B, Tuncekin A, Ciftci H. Comparison of Conservative and Surgical Treatments in Symptomatic Pregnancy Hydronephrosis. Urol Int. 105(11-12):1085-1091, 2021. | |
| 46. | Nuri Bodakci M, Kemal Hatipoglu N, Ozler A, et al. Hydronephrosis during pregnancy: how to make a decision about the time of intervention?. Med. glas. Ljek. komore Zenicko-doboj. kantona. 11(1):165-9, 2014 Feb. | |
| 47. | Dell'Atti L. Our ultrasonographic experience in the management of symptomatic hydronephrosis during pregnancy. J. ultrasound. 19(1):1-5, 2016 Mar. | |
| 48. | Choi CI, Yu YD, Park DS. Ureteral Stent Insertion in the Management of Renal Colic during Pregnancy. Chonnam Med J. 52(2):123-7, 2016 May. | |
| 49. | Bold MS, Boyum JH, Potretzke AM, et al. Detection of distal ureteral stones in pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasound. J. ultrasound. 24(4):397-402, 2021 Dec. | |
| 50. | American College of Radiology. ACR–SPR Practice Parameter for the Safe and Optimal Performance of Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=89+&releaseId=2. | |
| 51. | American College of Radiology. ACR-SPR Practice Parameter for Imaging Pregnant or Potentially Pregnant Patients with Ionizing Radiation. Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=23+&releaseId=2. | |
| 52. | American College of Radiology. ACR-ACOG-AIUM-SMFM-SRU Practice Parameter for the Performance of Standard Diagnostic Obstetrical Ultrasound. Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=28+&releaseId=2. | |
| 53. | American College of Radiology. ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. Manual on Contrast Media. Available at: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Contrast-Manual. | |
| 54. | American College of Radiology. ACR Committee on MR Safety. 2024 ACR Manual on MR Safety. Available at: https://edge.sitecorecloud.io/americancoldf5f-acrorgf92a-productioncb02-3650/media/ACR/Files/Clinical/Radiology-Safety/Manual-on-MR-Safety.pdf. | |
| 55. | American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction. Available at: https://edge.sitecorecloud.io/americancoldf5f-acrorgf92a-productioncb02-3650/media/ACR/Files/Clinical/Appropriateness-Criteria/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria-Radiation-Dose-Assessment-Introduction.pdf. |
The ACR Committee on Appropriateness Criteria and its expert panels have developed criteria for determining appropriate imaging examinations for diagnosis and treatment of specified medical condition(s). These criteria are intended to guide radiologists, radiation oncologists and referring physicians in making decisions regarding radiologic imaging and treatment. Generally, the complexity and severity of a patient’s clinical condition should dictate the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Only those examinations generally used for evaluation of the patient’s condition are ranked. Other imaging studies necessary to evaluate other co-existent diseases or other medical consequences of this condition are not considered in this document. The availability of equipment or personnel may influence the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Imaging techniques classified as investigational by the FDA have not been considered in developing these criteria; however, study of new equipment and applications should be encouraged. The ultimate decision regarding the appropriateness of any specific radiologic examination or treatment must be made by the referring physician and radiologist in light of all the circumstances presented in an individual examination.