Imaging of Suspected Intracranial Hypotension
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| MRI complete spine without and with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | O |
| MRI complete spine without IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without and with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | O |
| CT myelography complete spine | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢☢ |
| Radiographic myelography digital subtraction complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| MR myelography complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI complete spine with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| CT head cisternography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| DTPA cisternography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT complete spine with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT complete spine without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT complete spine without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT myelography dynamic complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢☢ |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| Radiographic myelography digital subtraction complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| MR myelography complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI complete spine with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI complete spine without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI complete spine without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| CT head cisternography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| DTPA cisternography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT complete spine with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT complete spine without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT complete spine without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT myelography complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢☢ |
| CT myelography dynamic complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢☢ |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| Radiographic myelography digital subtraction complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| MR myelography complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI complete spine with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI complete spine without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI complete spine without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| CT head cisternography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| DTPA cisternography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT complete spine with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT complete spine without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT complete spine without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT myelography complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢☢ |
| CT myelography dynamic complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢☢ |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| MRI complete spine without and with IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | O |
| MRI complete spine without IV contrast | Usually Appropriate | O |
| CT myelography complete spine | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢☢ |
| Radiographic myelography digital subtraction complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| MR myelography complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI complete spine with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| DTPA cisternography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT complete spine with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT complete spine without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT complete spine without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT myelography dynamic complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢☢ |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| Radiographic myelography digital subtraction complete spine | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT myelography dynamic complete spine | Usually Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢☢ |
| MR myelography complete spine | May Be Appropriate | O |
| DTPA cisternography | May Be Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head cisternography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| Procedure | Appropriateness Category | Relative Radiation Level |
| Radiographic myelography digital subtraction complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| MR myelography complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI complete spine with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI complete spine without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI complete spine without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| MRI head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | O |
| CT head cisternography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT head without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| DTPA cisternography | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢ |
| CT complete spine with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT complete spine without and with IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT complete spine without IV contrast | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢ |
| CT myelography complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢☢ |
| CT myelography dynamic complete spine | Usually Not Appropriate | ☢☢☢☢☢ |
Initial imaging is defined as imaging at the beginning of the care episode for the medical condition defined by the variant. More than one procedure can be considered usually appropriate in the initial imaging evaluation when:
- There are procedures that are equivalent alternatives (i.e., only one procedure will be ordered to provide the clinical information to effectively manage the patient’s care)
OR
- There are complementary procedures (i.e., more than one procedure is ordered as a set or simultaneously wherein each procedure provides unique clinical information to effectively manage the patient’s care).
A. CT complete spine with IV contrast
B. CT complete spine without and with IV contrast
C. CT complete spine without IV contrast
D. CT head cisternography
E. CT head with IV contrast
F. CT head without and with IV contrast
G. CT head without IV contrast
H. CT myelography complete spine
I. CT myelography dynamic complete spine
J. DTPA cisternography
K. MR myelography complete spine
L. MRI complete spine with IV contrast
M. MRI complete spine without and with IV contrast
N. MRI complete spine without IV contrast
O. MRI head with IV contrast
P. MRI head without and with IV contrast
Q. MRI head without IV contrast
R. Radiographic myelography digital subtraction complete spine
A. CT complete spine with IV contrast
B. CT complete spine without and with IV contrast
C. CT complete spine without IV contrast
D. CT head cisternography
E. CT head with IV contrast
F. CT head without and with IV contrast
G. CT head without IV contrast
H. CT myelography complete spine
I. CT myelography dynamic complete spine
J. DTPA cisternography
K. MR myelography complete spine
L. MRI complete spine with IV contrast
M. MRI complete spine without and with IV contrast
N. MRI complete spine without IV contrast
O. MRI head with IV contrast
P. MRI head without and with IV contrast
Q. MRI head without IV contrast
R. Radiographic myelography digital subtraction complete spine
A. CT complete spine with IV contrast
B. CT complete spine without and with IV contrast
C. CT complete spine without IV contrast
D. CT head cisternography
E. CT head with IV contrast
F. CT head without and with IV contrast
G. CT head without IV contrast
H. CT myelography complete spine
I. CT myelography dynamic complete spine
J. DTPA cisternography
K. MR myelography complete spine
L. MRI complete spine with IV contrast
M. MRI complete spine without and with IV contrast
N. MRI complete spine without IV contrast
O. MRI head with IV contrast
P. MRI head without and with IV contrast
Q. MRI head without IV contrast
R. Radiographic myelography digital subtraction complete spine
A. CT complete spine with IV contrast
B. CT complete spine without and with IV contrast
C. CT complete spine without IV contrast
D. CT myelography complete spine
E. CT myelography dynamic complete spine
F. DTPA cisternography
G. MR myelography complete spine
H. MRI complete spine with IV contrast
I. MRI complete spine without and with IV contrast
J. MRI complete spine without IV contrast
K. Radiographic myelography digital subtraction complete spine
A. CT head cisternography
B. CT myelography dynamic complete spine
C. DTPA cisternography
D. MR myelography complete spine
E. Radiographic myelography digital subtraction complete spine
A. CT complete spine with IV contrast
B. CT complete spine without and with IV contrast
C. CT complete spine without IV contrast
D. CT head cisternography
E. CT head with IV contrast
F. CT head without and with IV contrast
G. CT head without IV contrast
H. CT myelography complete spine
I. CT myelography dynamic complete spine
J. DTPA cisternography
K. MR myelography complete spine
L. MRI complete spine with IV contrast
M. MRI complete spine without and with IV contrast
N. MRI complete spine without IV contrast
O. MRI head with IV contrast
P. MRI head without and with IV contrast
Q. MRI head without IV contrast
R. Radiographic myelography digital subtraction complete spine
The evidence table, literature search, and appendix for this topic are available at https://acsearch.acr.org/list. The appendix includes the strength of evidence assessment and the final rating round tabulations for each recommendation.
For additional information on the Appropriateness Criteria methodology and other supporting documents, please go to the ACR website at https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Appropriateness-Criteria.
|
Appropriateness Category Name |
Appropriateness Rating |
Appropriateness Category Definition |
|
Usually Appropriate |
7, 8, or 9 |
The imaging procedure or treatment is indicated in the specified clinical scenarios at a favorable risk-benefit ratio for patients. |
|
May Be Appropriate |
4, 5, or 6 |
The imaging procedure or treatment may be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios as an alternative to imaging procedures or treatments with a more favorable risk-benefit ratio, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is equivocal. |
|
May Be Appropriate (Disagreement) |
5 |
The individual ratings are too dispersed from the panel median. The different label provides transparency regarding the panel’s recommendation. “May be appropriate” is the rating category and a rating of 5 is assigned. |
|
Usually Not Appropriate |
1, 2, or 3 |
The imaging procedure or treatment is unlikely to be indicated in the specified clinical scenarios, or the risk-benefit ratio for patients is likely to be unfavorable. |
Potential adverse health effects associated with radiation exposure are an important factor to consider when selecting the appropriate imaging procedure. Because there is a wide range of radiation exposures associated with different diagnostic procedures, a relative radiation level (RRL) indication has been included for each imaging examination. The RRLs are based on effective dose, which is a radiation dose quantity that is used to estimate population total radiation risk associated with an imaging procedure. Patients in the pediatric age group are at inherently higher risk from exposure, because of both organ sensitivity and longer life expectancy (relevant to the long latency that appears to accompany radiation exposure). For these reasons, the RRL dose estimate ranges for pediatric examinations are lower as compared with those specified for adults (see Table below). Additional information regarding radiation dose assessment for imaging examinations can be found in the ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction document.
|
Relative Radiation Level Designations |
||
|
Relative Radiation Level* |
Adult Effective Dose Estimate Range |
Pediatric Effective Dose Estimate Range |
|
O |
0 mSv |
0 mSv |
|
☢ |
<0.1 mSv |
<0.03 mSv |
|
☢☢ |
0.1-1 mSv |
0.03-0.3 mSv |
|
☢☢☢ |
1-10 mSv |
0.3-3 mSv |
|
☢☢☢☢ |
10-30 mSv |
3-10 mSv |
|
☢☢☢☢☢ |
30-100 mSv |
10-30 mSv |
|
*RRL assignments for some of the examinations cannot be made, because the actual patient doses in these procedures vary as a function of a number of factors (e.g., region of the body exposed to ionizing radiation, the imaging guidance that is used). The RRLs for these examinations are designated as “Varies.” |
||
| 1. | Dobrocky T, Nicholson P, Hani L, et al. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension: searching for the CSF leak. [Review]. Lancet Neurology. 21(4):369-380, 2022 04. | |
| 2. | Kranz PG, Gray L, Malinzak MD, Amrhein TJ. Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment. [Review]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 29(4):581-594, 2019 Nov. | |
| 3. | . Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 38(1):1-211, 2018 01. | |
| 4. | D'Antona L, Jaime Merchan MA, Vassiliou A, et al. Clinical Presentation, Investigation Findings, and Treatment Outcomes of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurology. 78(3):329-337, 2021 03 01. | |
| 5. | Schievink WI, Maya MM, Moser F, Tourje J, Torbati S. Frequency of spontaneous intracranial hypotension in the emergency department. J HEADACHE PAIN. 8(6):325-8, 2007 Dec. | |
| 6. | Kim YJ, Cho HY, Seo DW, et al. Misdiagnosis of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension as a Risk Factor for Subdural Hematoma. Headache. 57(10):1593-1600, 2017 Nov. | |
| 7. | Kranz PG, Gray L, Amrhein TJ. Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: 10 Myths and Misperceptions. [Review]. Headache. 58(7):948-959, 2018 Jul. | |
| 8. | Schievink WI. Misdiagnosis of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Archives of Neurology. 60(12):1713-8, 2003 Dec. | |
| 9. | Beck J, Ulrich CT, Fung C, et al. Diskogenic microspurs as a major cause of intractable spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Neurology. 87(12):1220-6, 2016 Sep 20. | |
| 10. | Kranz PG, Amrhein TJ, Gray L. Rebound intracranial hypertension: a complication of epidural blood patching for intracranial hypotension. [Review]. Ajnr: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 35(6):1237-40, 2014 Jun. | |
| 11. | Liu FC, Fuh JL, Wang YF, Wang SJ. Connective tissue disorders in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Cephalalgia. 31(6):691-5, 2011 Apr. | |
| 12. | Schievink WI, Gordon OK, Tourje J. Connective tissue disorders with spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks and intracranial hypotension: a prospective study. Neurosurgery. 54(1):65-70; discussion 70-1, 2004 Jan. | |
| 13. | Amorim JA, Gomes de Barros MV, Valenca MM. Post-dural (post-lumbar) puncture headache: risk factors and clinical features. Cephalalgia. 32(12):916-23, 2012 Sep. | |
| 14. | DelPizzo K, Cheng J, Dong N, et al. Post-Dural Puncture Headache is Uncommon in Young Ambulatory Surgery Patients. HSS Journal. 13(2):146-151, 2017 Jul. | |
| 15. | Philip JT, Flores MA, Beegle RD, Dodson SC, Messina SA, Murray JV. Rates of Epidural Blood Patch following Lumbar Puncture Comparing Atraumatic versus Bevel-Tip Needles Stratified for Body Mass Index. Ajnr: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 43(2):315-318, 2022 02. | |
| 16. | Dobrocky T, Grunder L, Breiding PS, et al. Assessing Spinal Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension With a Scoring System Based on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings. JAMA Neurology. 76(5):580-587, 2019 05 01. | |
| 17. | Mamlouk MD, Shen PY, Sedrak MF, Dillon WP. CT-guided Fibrin Glue Occlusion of Cerebrospinal Fluid-Venous Fistulas. Radiology. 299(2):409-418, 2021 05. | |
| 18. | Kranz PG, Luetmer PH, Diehn FE, Amrhein TJ, Tanpitukpongse TP, Gray L. Myelographic Techniques for the Detection of Spinal CSF Leaks in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. [Review]. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 206(1):8-19, 2016 Jan. | |
| 19. | Schievink WI, Maya MM, Jean-Pierre S, Nuno M, Prasad RS, Moser FG. A classification system of spontaneous spinal CSF leaks. Neurology. 87(7):673-9, 2016 Aug 16. | |
| 20. | Schievink WI. Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. [Review]. New England Journal of Medicine. 385(23):2173-2178, 2021 12 02. | |
| 21. | Magnaes B. Body position and cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Part 2: clinical studies on orthostatic pressure and the hydrostatic indifferent point. Journal of Neurosurgery. 44(6):698-705, 1976 Jun. | |
| 22. | Schievink WI, Schwartz MS, Maya MM, Moser FG, Rozen TD. Lack of causal association between spontaneous intracranial hypotension and cranial cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Journal of Neurosurgery. 116(4):749-54, 2012 Apr. | |
| 23. | Kranz PG, Gray L, Taylor JN. CT-guided epidural blood patching of directly observed or potential leak sites for the targeted treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 32(5):832-8, 2011 May. | |
| 24. | Callen AL, Timpone VM, Schwertner A, et al. Algorithmic Multimodality Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment of Spinal CSF Leak and Venous Fistula in Patients With Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. [Review]. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 219(2):292-301, 2022 08. | |
| 25. | Watanabe A, Horikoshi T, Uchida M, Koizumi H, Yagishita T, Kinouchi H. Diagnostic value of spinal MR imaging in spontaneous intracranial hypotension syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 30(1):147-51, 2009 Jan. | |
| 26. | Chen ST, Wu JW, Wang YF, Lirng JF, Hseu SS, Wang SJ. The time sequence of brain MRI findings in spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Cephalalgia. 42(1):12-19, 2022 01. | |
| 27. | Schievink WI, Maya M, Moser F, Nuno M. Long-term Risks of Persistent Ventral Spinal CSF Leaks in SIH: Superficial Siderosis and Bibrachial Amyotrophy. Neurology. 97(19):e1964-e1970, 2021 11 09. | |
| 28. | Medina JH, Abrams K, Falcone S, Bhatia RG. Spinal imaging findings in spontaneous intracranial hypotension. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 195(2):459-64, 2010 Aug. | |
| 29. | Dillon WP. Spinal manifestations of intracranial hypotension. Ajnr: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 22(7):1233-4, 2001 Aug. | |
| 30. | Kranz PG, Amrhein TJ, Gray L. CSF Venous Fistulas in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: Imaging Characteristics on Dynamic and CT Myelography. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 209(6):1360-1366, 2017 Dec. | |
| 31. | Kranz PG, Tanpitukpongse TP, Choudhury KR, Amrhein TJ, Gray L. How common is normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure in spontaneous intracranial hypotension?. Cephalalgia. 36(13):1209-1217, 2016 Nov. | |
| 32. | Callen AL, Pattee J, Thaker AA, et al. Relationship of Bern Score, Spinal Elastance, and Opening Pressure in Patients With Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. Neurology. 100(22):e2237-e2246, 2023 05 30. | |
| 33. | Bond KM, Benson JC, Cutsforth-Gregory JK, Kim DK, Diehn FE, Carr CM. Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: Atypical Radiologic Appearances, Imaging Mimickers, and Clinical Look-Alikes. [Review]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 41(8):1339-1347, 2020 08. | |
| 34. | Wang YF, Lirng JF, Fuh JL, Hseu SS, Wang SJ. Heavily T2-weighted MR myelography vs CT myelography in spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Neurology. 73(22):1892-8, 2009 Dec 01. | |
| 35. | Kim BR, Lee JW, Lee E, Kang Y, Ahn JM, Kang HS. Utility of heavily T2-weighted MR myelography as the first step in CSF leak detection and the planning of epidural blood patches. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. 77:110-115, 2020 Jul. | |
| 36. | Starling A, Hernandez F, Hoxworth JM, et al. Sensitivity of MRI of the spine compared with CT myelography in orthostatic headache with CSF leak. Neurology. 81(20):1789-92, 2013 Nov 12. | |
| 37. | Caton MT Jr, Laguna B, Soderlund KA, Dillon WP, Shah VN. Spinal Compliance Curves: Preliminary Experience with a New Tool for Evaluating Suspected CSF Venous Fistulas on CT Myelography in Patients with Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. Ajnr: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 42(5):986-992, 2021 05. | |
| 38. | Dobrocky T, Mosimann PJ, Zibold F, et al. Cryptogenic Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: Role of Dynamic CT Myelography. Radiology. 289(3):766-772, 2018 12. | |
| 39. | Madhavan AA, Verdoorn JT, Shlapak DP, et al. Lateral decubitus dynamic CT myelography for fast cerebrospinal fluid leak localization. Neuroradiology. 64(9):1897-1903, 2022 Sep. | |
| 40. | Mamlouk MD, Ochi RP, Jun P, Shen PY. Decubitus CT Myelography for CSF-Venous Fistulas: A Procedural Approach. Ajnr: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 42(1):32-36, 2021 01. | |
| 41. | Kim DK, Brinjikji W, Morris PP, et al. Lateral Decubitus Digital Subtraction Myelography: Tips, Tricks, and Pitfalls. [Review]. Ajnr: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 41(1):21-28, 2020 01. | |
| 42. | Schievink WI, Maya MM, Moser FG, et al. Lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelography to identify spinal CSF-venous fistulas in spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Journal of Neurosurgery Spine. 1-4, 2019 Sep 13. | |
| 43. | Shlapak DP, Mark IT, Kim DK, et al. Incremental diagnostic yield and clinical outcomes of lateral decubitus CT myelogram immediately following negative lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelogram. Neuroradiology Journal. 36(5):593-600, 2023 Oct. | |
| 44. | Carlton Jones L, Goadsby PJ. Same-Day Bilateral Decubitus CT Myelography for Detecting CSF-Venous Fistulas in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. Ajnr: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 43(4):645-648, 2022 04. | |
| 45. | Monteith TS, Kralik SF, Dillon WP, Hawkins RA, Goadsby PJ. The utility of radioisotope cisternography in low CSF/volume syndromes compared to myelography. Cephalalgia. 36(13):1291-1295, 2016 Nov. | |
| 46. | Sakurai K, Nishio M, Yamada K, et al. Comparison of the radioisotope cisternography findings of spontaneous intracranial hypotension and iatrogenic cerebrospinal fluid leakage focusing on chronological changes. Cephalalgia. 32(15):1131-9, 2012 Nov. | |
| 47. | Madhavan AA, Carr CM, Benson JC, et al. Diagnostic Yield of Intrathecal Gadolinium MR Myelography for CSF Leak Localization. Clinical Neuroradiology. 32(2):537-545, 2022 Jun. | |
| 48. | Akbar JJ, Luetmer PH, Schwartz KM, Hunt CH, Diehn FE, Eckel LJ. The role of MR myelography with intrathecal gadolinium in localization of spinal CSF leaks in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 33(3):535-40, 2012 Mar. | |
| 49. | Chazen JL, Talbott JF, Lantos JE, Dillon WP. MR myelography for identification of spinal CSF leak in spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Ajnr: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 35(10):2007-12, 2014 Oct. | |
| 50. | Chazen JL, Robbins MS, Strauss SB, Schweitzer AD, Greenfield JP. MR Myelography for the Detection of CSF-Venous Fistulas. Ajnr: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 41(5):938-940, 2020 05. | |
| 51. | Patel M, Atyani A, Salameh JP, McInnes M, Chakraborty S. Safety of Intrathecal Administration of Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology. 297(1):75-83, 2020 Oct. | |
| 52. | Dobrocky T, Winklehner A, Breiding PS, et al. Spine MRI in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension for CSF Leak Detection: Nonsuperiority of Intrathecal Gadolinium to Heavily T2-Weighted Fat-Saturated Sequences. Ajnr: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 41(7):1309-1315, 2020 07. | |
| 53. | Schievink WI, Maya M, Prasad RS, et al. Spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid-venous fistulas in patients with orthostatic headaches and normal conventional brain and spine imaging. Headache. 61(2):387-391, 2021 02. | |
| 54. | Schievink WI, Moser FG, Maya MM, Prasad RS. Digital subtraction myelography for the identification of spontaneous spinal CSF-venous fistulas. Journal of Neurosurgery Spine. 24(6):960-4, 2016 Jun. | |
| 55. | Flaatten H, Thorsen T, Askeland B, et al. Puncture technique and postural postdural puncture headache. A randomised, double-blind study comparing transverse and parallel puncture. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 42(10):1209-14, 1998 Nov. | |
| 56. | Zorrilla-Vaca A, Makkar JK. Effectiveness of Lateral Decubitus Position for Preventing Post-Dural Puncture Headache: A Meta-Analysis. Pain Physician. 20(4):E521-E529, 2017 05. | |
| 57. | Seeberger MD, Kaufmann M, Staender S, Schneider M, Scheidegger D. Repeated dural punctures increase the incidence of postdural puncture headache. Anesth Analg 1996;82:302-5. | |
| 58. | Zorrilla-Vaca A, Mathur V, Wu CL, Grant MC. The Impact of Spinal Needle Selection on Postdural Puncture Headache: A Meta-Analysis and Metaregression of Randomized Studies. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 43(5):502-508, 2018 Jul. | |
| 59. | Booth JL, Pan PH, Thomas JA, Harris LC, D'Angelo R. A retrospective review of an epidural blood patch database: the incidence of epidural blood patch associated with obstetric neuraxial anesthetic techniques and the effect of blood volume on efficacy. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia. 29:10-17, 2017 Feb. | |
| 60. | Safa-Tisseront V, Thormann F, Malassine P, et al. Effectiveness of epidural blood patch in the management of post-dural puncture headache. Anesthesiology. 95(2):334-9, 2001 Aug. | |
| 61. | American Society of Anesthesiologists. Statement on Post-Dural Puncture Headache Management. Available at: https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/statement-on-post-dural-puncture-headache-management. | |
| 62. | Idrissi AL, Lacour JC, Klein O, Schmitt E, Ducrocq X, Richard S. Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: Characteristics of the Serious Form in a Series of 24 Patients. World Neurosurgery. 84(6):1613-20, 2015 Dec. | |
| 63. | Schievink WI, Maya MM, Moser FG, Jean-Pierre S, Nuno M. Coma: A serious complication of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Neurology. 90(19):e1638-e1645, 2018 05 08. | |
| 64. | Muram S, Yavin D, DuPlessis S. Intrathecal Saline Infusion as an Effective Temporizing Measure in the Management of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. World Neurosurg. 125:37-41, 2019 05. | |
| 65. | Stephen CD, Rojas R, Lioutas VA, Papavassiliou E, Simon DK. Complicated spontaneous intracranial hypotension treated with intrathecal saline infusion. Pract. neurol.. 16(2):146-9, 2016 Apr. | |
| 66. | Sass C, Kosinski C, Schmidt P, Mull M, Schulz J, Schiefer J. Intrathecal saline infusion: an emergency procedure in a patient with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Neurocrit Care. 19(1):116-8, 2013 Aug. | |
| 67. | Binder DK, Dillon WP, Fishman RA, Schmidt MH. Intrathecal saline infusion in the treatment of obtundation associated with spontaneous intracranial hypotension: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 51(3):830-6; discussion 836-7, 2002 Sep. | |
| 68. | Farb RI, Nicholson PJ, Peng PW, et al. Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: A Systematic Imaging Approach for CSF Leak Localization and Management Based on MRI and Digital Subtraction Myelography. Ajnr: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 40(4):745-753, 2019 04. | |
| 69. | Kranz PG, Gray L, Malinzak MD, Houk JL, Kim DK, Amrhein TJ. CSF-Venous Fistulas: Anatomy and Diagnostic Imaging. [Review]. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 217(6):1418-1429, 2021 12. | |
| 70. | Amrhein TJ, Gray L, Malinzak MD, Kranz PG. Respiratory Phase Affects the Conspicuity of CSF-Venous Fistulas in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension. Ajnr: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 41(9):1754-1756, 2020 09. | |
| 71. | Schievink WI, Maya MM, Jean-Pierre S, Moser FG, Nuno M, Pressman BD. Rebound high-pressure headache after treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension: MRV study. Neurology Clinical Practice. 9(2):93-100, 2019 Apr. | |
| 72. | American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiation Dose Assessment Introduction. Available at: https://edge.sitecorecloud.io/americancoldf5f-acrorgf92a-productioncb02-3650/media/ACR/Files/Clinical/Appropriateness-Criteria/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria-Radiation-Dose-Assessment-Introduction.pdf. |
The ACR Committee on Appropriateness Criteria and its expert panels have developed criteria for determining appropriate imaging examinations for diagnosis and treatment of specified medical condition(s). These criteria are intended to guide radiologists, radiation oncologists and referring physicians in making decisions regarding radiologic imaging and treatment. Generally, the complexity and severity of a patient’s clinical condition should dictate the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Only those examinations generally used for evaluation of the patient’s condition are ranked. Other imaging studies necessary to evaluate other co-existent diseases or other medical consequences of this condition are not considered in this document. The availability of equipment or personnel may influence the selection of appropriate imaging procedures or treatments. Imaging techniques classified as investigational by the FDA have not been considered in developing these criteria; however, study of new equipment and applications should be encouraged. The ultimate decision regarding the appropriateness of any specific radiologic examination or treatment must be made by the referring physician and radiologist in light of all the circumstances presented in an individual examination.