ACR PRACTICE PARAMETER FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF PREOPERATIVE IMAGE-GUIDED LOCALIZATION IN THE BREAST

PREAMBLE

I. INTRODUCTION

II. INDICATIONS

III. QUALIFICATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PERSONNEL

IV. SPECIFICATIONS OF THE PROCEDURE

V. DOCUMENTATION

VI. QUALITY CONTROL, AND IMPROVEMENT, SAFETY, INFECTION CONTROL, AND PATIENT EDUCATION

VII. EQUIPMENT

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

REFERENCES

1. [28968154] Jeffries DO, Dossett LA, Jorns JM. Localization for Breast Surgery: The Next Generation. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Oct;141(10):1324-1329.
2. [-3197852] Food and Drug Administration. Mammography quality standards; final rule. Available at: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/10/2023-04550/mammography-quality-standards-act.
3. [-3098658] American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Stereotactic/Tomosynthesis-Guided Breast Interventional Procedures. Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=65+&releaseId=2
4. [-3098656] American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Breast Interventional Procedures. Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=125+&releaseId=2
5. [-3098655] American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Parameter for the Performance of a Diagnostic Breast Ultrasound Examination. Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=124+&releaseId=2
6. [-3196807] American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Breast. Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=6+&releaseId=2
7. [-3197625] American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Breast Interventional Procedures. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=123+&releaseId=2
8. [-3196801] American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Screening and Diagnostic Mammography. Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=8+&releaseId=2
9. [18722938] Kirstein LJ, Rafferty E, Specht MC, et al. Outcomes of multiple wire localization for larger breast cancers: when can mastectomy be avoided?. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Sep;207(3):342-6.
10. [11517048] Liberman L, Kaplan J, Van Zee KJ, et al. Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Sep;177(3):565-72.
11. [25794081] Sharek D, Zuley ML, Zhang JY, Soran A, Ahrendt GM, Ganott MA. Radioactive seed localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: a comparison of outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Apr;204(4):872-7.
12. [29271240] Cheang E, Ha R, Thornton CM, Mango VL. Innovations in image-guided preoperative breast lesion localization. [Review]. Br J Radiol. 91(1085):20170740, 2018 May.
13. [18248562] Hughes JH, Mason MC, Gray RJ, et al. A multi-site validation trial of radioactive seed localization as an alternative to wire localization. Breast J. 2008;14(2):153-7.
14. [19954769] Jakub JW, Gray RJ, Degnim AC, Boughey JC, Gardner M, Cox CE. Current status of radioactive seed for localization of non palpable breast lesions. [Review] [19 refs]. Am J Surg. 199(4):522-8, 2010 Apr.
15. [21947587] McGhan LJ, McKeever SC, Pockaj BA, et al. Radioactive seed localization for nonpalpable breast lesions: review of 1,000 consecutive procedures at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3096-101.
16. [21906208] Alderliesten T, Loo CE, Pengel KE, Rutgers EJ, Gilhuijs KG, Vrancken Peeters MJ. Radioactive seed localization of breast lesions: an adequate localization method without seed migration. Breast J. 2011;17(6):594-601.
17. [27007608] Dryden MJ, Dogan BE, Fox P, et al. Imaging Factors That Influence Surgical Margins After Preoperative 125I Radioactive Seed Localization of Breast Lesions: Comparison With Wire Localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 May;206(5):1112-8.
18. [26274097] Goudreau SH, Joseph JP, Seiler SJ. Preoperative Radioactive Seed Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: Technique, Pitfalls, and Solutions. Radiographics. 2015;35(5):1319-34.
19. [28411682] Hayes MK. Update on Preoperative Breast Localization. Radiol Clin North Am. 2017 May;55(3):S0033-8389(16)30211-1.
20. [27469121] Cox CE, Russell S, Prowler V, et al. A Prospective, Single Arm, Multi-site, Clinical Evaluation of a Nonradioactive Surgical Guidance Technology for the Location of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions during Excision. Ann Surg Oncol. 23(10):3168-74, 2016 10.
21. [27304083] Mango V, Ha R, Gomberawalla A, Wynn R, Feldman S. Evaluation of the SAVI SCOUT Surgical Guidance System for Localization and Excision of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: A Feasibility Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Oct;207(4):W69-W72.
22. [29453521] Harvey JR, Lim Y, Murphy J, et al. Safety and feasibility of breast lesion localization using magnetic seeds (Magseed): a multi-centre, open-label cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jun;169(3):531-536.
23. [29446680] Price ER, Khoury AL, Esserman LJ, Joe BN, Alvarado MD. Initial Clinical Experience With an Inducible Magnetic Seed System for Preoperative Breast Lesion Localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Apr;210(4):913-917.
24. [30085842] Lamb LR, Bahl M, Specht MC, D'Alessandro HA, Lehman CD. Evaluation of a Nonradioactive Magnetic Marker Wireless Localization Program. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Oct;211(4):940-945.
25. [31560614] Kapoor MM, Patel MM, Scoggins ME. The Wire and Beyond: Recent Advances in Breast Imaging Preoperative Needle Localization. [Review]. Radiographics. 39(7):1886-1906, 2019 Nov-Dec.
26. [8273685] Graham RA, Homer MJ, Sigler CJ, et al. The efficacy of specimen radiography in evaluating the surgical margins of impalpable breast carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Jan;162(1):33-6.
27. [7998574] Lee CH, Carter D. Detecting residual tumor after excisional biopsy of impalpable breast carcinoma: efficacy of comparing preoperative mammograms with radiographs of the biopsy specimen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jan;164(1):81-6.
28. [16554572] Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Hori D, et al. Sonography of postexcision specimens of nonpalpable breast lesions: value, limitations, and description of a method. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Apr;186(4):1014-24.
29. [3496752] Rebner M, Pennes DR, Baker DE, Adler DD, Boyd P. Two-view specimen radiography in surgical biopsy of nonpalpable breast masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Aug;149(2):283-5.
30. [17138112] Goldfeder S, Davis D, Cullinan J. Breast specimen radiography: can it predict margin status of excised breast carcinoma?. Acad Radiol. 2006 Dec;13(12):1453-9.
31. [15474443] McCormick JT, Keleher AJ, Tikhomirov VB, Budway RJ, Caushaj PF. Analysis of the use of specimen mammography in breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg. 2004 Oct;188(4):433-6.
32. [25517573] Caudle AS, Yang WT, Mittendorf EA, et al. Selective surgical localization of axillary lymph nodes containing metastases in patients with breast cancer: a prospective feasibility trial. JAMA Surg. 150(2):137-43, 2015 Feb.
33. [27726422] Shin K, Caudle AS, Kuerer HM, et al. Radiologic Mapping for Targeted Axillary Dissection: Needle Biopsy to Excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 207(6):1372-1379, 2016 Dec.
34. [-3197621] American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Parameter for Communication of Diagnostic Imaging Findings. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=74+&releaseId=2