PPTS Portal Home
Revised 2021 (Resolution 31)
Document Navigator
All
I. INTRODUCTION
II. INDICATIONS AND CONTRAINDICATIONS
III. QUALIFICATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PHYSICIAN
IV. SPECIFICATIONS OF THE PROCEDURE
V. DOCUMENTATION
VI. EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
VII. QUALITY CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT, SAFETY, INFECTION CONTROL, AND PATIENT EDUCATION
REFERENCES
Document Navigator
ACR PRACTICE PARAMETER FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PERCUTANEOUS BREAST INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES
I. INTRODUCTION
II. INDICATIONS AND CONTRAINDICATIONS
III. QUALIFICATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PHYSICIAN
IV. SPECIFICATIONS OF THE PROCEDURE
V. DOCUMENTATION
VI. EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
VII. QUALITY CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT, SAFETY, INFECTION CONTROL, AND PATIENT EDUCATION
REFERENCES
1. [20008742]
Bruening W, Fontanarosa J, Tipton K, Treadwell JR, Launders J, Schoelles K. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of core-needle and open surgical biopsy to diagnose breast lesions. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(4):238-246.
2. [7972743]
Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology. 1994; 193(2):359-364.
3. [11371735]
White RR, Halperin TT, Olson JJ, Soo MM, Bentley RR, Seigler HH. Impact of core-needle breast biopsy on the surgical management of mammographic abnormalities. Ann Surg 233:769-77, .
4. [-3098655]
American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Parameter for the Performance of a Diagnostic Breast Ultrasound Examination. Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=124+&releaseId=2
5. [-3197621]
American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Parameter for Communication of Diagnostic Imaging Findings. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=74+&releaseId=2
6. [-3100780]
D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013.
7. [19449232]
Cho NN, Moon WW, Cha JJ, et al. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography. Acta Radiol 50:602-9, .
8. [19039266]
Kim HH, Kim MM, Kim EE, Kwak JJ, Son EE, Oh KK. US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications in breast lesions and long-term follow-up results. Korean J Radiol 9:503-9, .
9. [22422382]
Suh YJ, Kim MJ, Kim EK, et al. Comparison of the underestimation rate in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ at ultrasound-guided core biopsy: 14-gauge automated core-needle biopsy vs 8- or 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy. Br J Radiol. 85(1016):e349-56, 2012 Aug.
10. [12773685]
LaTrenta LL, Menell JJ, Morris EE, Abramson AA, Dershaw DD, Liberman LL. Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology 227:856-61, .
11. [-3198000]
Graf O, Helbich TH, Hopf G, Graf C, Sickles EA. . Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biospy? Radiology 2007;244:87-93.
12. [17991784]
Koelliker SS, Chung MM, Mainiero MM, Steinhoff MM, Cady BB. Axillary lymph nodes: US-guided fine-needle aspiration for initial staging of breast cancer--correlation with primary tumor size. Radiology 246:81-9, .
13. [22723042]
Hahn MM, Krainick-Strobel UU, Toellner TT, et al. Interdisciplinary consensus recommendations for the use of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy under sonographic guidance: first update 2012. Ultraschall Med 33:366-71, .
14. [17688722]
Mathew JJ, Crawford DD, Lwin MM, Barwick CC, Gash AA. Ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted excision in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically benign breast lesions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89:494-6, .
15. [12860764]
Sperber FF, Blank AA, Metser UU, Flusser GG, Klausner JJ, Lev-Chelouche DD. Diagnosis and treatment of breast fibroadenomas by ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy. Arch Surg 138:796-800, .
16. [19885313]
Chang JJ, Cho NN, Moon WW, Park JJ, Chung SS, Jang MM. Does ultrasound-guided directional vacuum-assisted removal help eliminate abnormal nipple discharge in patients with benign intraductal single mass?. Korean J Radiol 10:575-80, .
17. [10789774]
Dennis MA, Parker S, Kaske TI, Stavros AT, Camp J. Incidental treatment of nipple discharge caused by benign intraductal papilloma through diagnostic Mammotome biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(5):1263-1268.
18. [31429678]
Choi HH, Kim SS, Jang MM, et al. Benign Breast Papilloma without Atypia: Outcomes of Surgical Excision versus US-guided Directional Vacuum-assisted Removal or US Follow-up. Radiology 293:72-80, .
19. [25691147]
Hawley JR, Lawther H, Erdal BS, Yildiz VO, Carkaci S. Outcomes of benign breast papillomas diagnosed at image-guided vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy. Clin Imaging. 39(4):576-81, 2015 Jul-Aug.
20. [27797135]
Seely JM, Verma R, Kielar A, et al. Benign Papillomas of the Breast Diagnosed on Large-Gauge Vacuum Biopsy compared with 14 Gauge Core Needle Biopsy - Do they require surgical excision?. Breast J. 23(2):146-153, 2017 Mar.
21. [31131512]
Wang ZZ, Liu GG, He YY, Li NN, Liu YY. Ultrasound-guided 7-gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsy: Could it be sufficient for the diagnosis and treatment of intraductal papilloma?. Breast J 25:807-812, .
22. [30204024]
Hahn MM, Fugunt RR, Schoenfisch BB, et al. High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of symptomatic breast fibroadenoma. Int J Hyperthermia 35:463-470, .
23. [23143883]
Hahn MM, Pavlista DD, Danes JJ, et al. Ultrasound guided cryoablation of fibroadenomas. Ultraschall Med 34:64-8, .
24. [16164941]
Nurko JJ, Mabry CC, Whitworth PP, et al. Interim results from the FibroAdenoma Cryoablation Treatment Registry. Am J Surg 190:647-51; discussion 651-2, .
25. [30130983]
Xu JJ, Wu HH, Han ZZ, et al. Microwave ablation of benign breast tumors: a prospective study with minimum 12 months follow-up. Int J Hyperthermia 35:253-261, .
26. [27762603]
Fleming MM, Holbrook AA, Newell MM. Update on Image-Guided Percutaneous Ablation of Breast Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:267-274, .
27. [29079443]
Ito TT, Oura SS, Nagamine SS, et al. Radiofrequency Ablation of Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study. Clin Breast Cancer 18:e495-e500, .
28. [27221361]
Simmons RR, Ballman KK, Cox CC, et al. A Phase II Trial Exploring the Success of Cryoablation Therapy in the Treatment of Invasive Breast Carcinoma: Results from ACOSOG (Alliance) Z1072. Ann Surg Oncol 23:2438-45, .
29. [21658688]
McMahon MM, James JJ, Cornford EE, Hamilton LL, Burrell HH. Does the insertion of a gel-based marker at stereotactic breast biopsy allow subsequent wire localizations to be carried out under ultrasound guidance?. Clin Radiol 66:840-4, .
30. [-3197734]
American College of Radiology. ACR–SIR–SPR Practice Parameter for Specifications and Performance of Image-Guided Drainage/Aspiration of Abscesses and Fluid Collections. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=2+&releaseId=2
31. [18806164]
Somerville PP, Seifert PP, Destounis SS, Murphy PP, Young WW. Anticoagulation and bleeding risk after core needle biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1194-7, .
32. [-3196801]
American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Screening and Diagnostic Mammography. Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=8+&releaseId=2
33. [-3198001]
Code of Federal Regulations. 21CFR Part 16 and 900: Mammography Quality Standards; Final Rule. Federal Register, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 62; No. 208; 55851-55994, October 28, 1997.
34. [-3197897]
American College of Radiology. ACR breast ultrasound accreditation program requirements. Available at: https://www.acraccreditation.org/Modalities/Breast-Ultrasound.
35. [-3197622]
American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Parameter for Continuing Medical Education. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=130+&releaseId=2
36. [-3198002]
Youk J, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Lee JY, Oh KK. Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them. Radiographics 2007;27:79-94.
37. [11135213]
Liberman LL, Drotman MM, Morris EE, et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. Cancer 89:2538-46, .
38. [7824740]
Kaplan SS, Racenstein MM, Wong WW, Hansen GG, McCombs MM, Bassett LL. US-guided core biopsy of the breast with a coaxial system. Radiology 194:573-5, .
39. [12601206]
Fishman JJ, Milikowski CC, Ramsinghani RR, Velasquez MM, Aviram GG. US-guided core-needle biopsy of the breast: how many specimens are necessary?. Radiology 226:779-82, .
40. [11044040]
Phillips SS, Gabriel HH, Comstock CC, Venta LL. Sonographically guided metallic clip placement after core needle biopsy of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1353-5, .
41. [18287433]
Brem RR, Lechner MM, Jackman RR, et al. Lobular neoplasia at percutaneous breast biopsy: variables associated with carcinoma at surgical excision. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:637-41, .
42. [22268169]
Destounis SV, Murphy PF, Seifert PJ, et al. Management of patients diagnosed with lobular carcinoma in situ at needle core biopsy at a community-based outpatient facility. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 198(2):281-7, 2012 Feb.
43. [19098204]
Eby PP, Ochsner JJ, DeMartini WW, Allison KK, Peacock SS, Lehman CC. Frequency and upgrade rates of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: 9-versus 11-gauge. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:229-34, .
44. [22268165]
Heller SS, Moy LL. Imaging features and management of high-risk lesions on contrast-enhanced dynamic breast MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:249-55, .
45. [19825003]
Ingegnoli AA, d'Aloia CC, Frattaruolo AA, et al. Flat epithelial atypia and atypical ductal hyperplasia: carcinoma underestimation rate. Breast J 16:55-9, .
46. [8090927]
Jackman RR, Nowels KK, Shepard MM, Finkelstein SS, Marzoni FF. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 193:91-5, .
47. [7717215]
Liberman LL, Cohen MM, Dershaw DD, Abramson AA, Hann LL, Rosen PP. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:1111-3, .
48. [16632727]
Liberman L, Tornos C, Huzjan R, Bartella L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. Is surgical excision warranted after benign, concordant diagnosis of papilloma at percutaneous breast biopsy? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(5):1328-1334.
49. [20308524]
Linda A, Zuiani C, Furlan A, et al. Radial scars without atypia diagnosed at imaging-guided needle biopsy: how often is associated malignancy found at subsequent surgical excision, and do mammography and sonography predict which lesions are malignant?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 194(4):1146-51, 2010 Apr.
50. [16985141]
Mahoney MM, Robinson-Smith TT, Shaughnessy EE. Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:949-54, .
51. [21862819]
Solorzano S, Mesurolle B, Omeroglu A, et al. Flat epithelial atypia of the breast: pathological-radiological correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 197(3):740-6, 2011 Sep.
52. [17090707]
Sydnor MK, Wilson JD, Hijaz TA, Massey HD, Shaw de Paredes ES. Underestimation of the presence of breast carcinoma in papillary lesions initially diagnosed at core-needle biopsy. Radiology. 2007;242(1):58-62.
53. [-3197641]
American College of Radiology. ACR–AAPM Technical Standard for Diagnostic Medical Physics Performance Monitoring of Real Time Ultrasound Equipment. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=118+&releaseId=2
54. [17214791]
Duchesne NN, Parker SS, Lechner MM, et al. Multicenter evaluation of a new ultrasound-guided biopsy device: Improved ergonomics, sampling and rebiopsy rates. Breast J 13:36-43, .
55. [11461871]
Parker SS, Klaus AA, McWey PP, et al. Sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using a handheld device. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:405-8, .
56. [12540431]
Philpotts LL, Hooley RR, Lee CC. Comparison of automated versus vacuum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:347-51, .
57. [18641246]
Schueller GG, Jaromi SS, Ponhold LL, et al. US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases. Radiology 248:406-13, .
58. [10831686]
Simon JR, Kalbhen CL, Cooper RA, Flisak ME. Accuracy and complication rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: initial results. Radiology 215:694-7, 2000 Jun.
59. [18094312]
Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Oh KK. Sonographically guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy of breast masses: a review of 2,420 cases with long-term follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 190(1):202-7, 2008 Jan.