ACR–NASCI–SIR–SPR PRACTICE PARAMETER FOR THE PERFORMANCE AND INTERPRETATION OF BODY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY (CTA)

PREAMBLE

I. INTRODUCTION

II. INDICATIONS

III. QUALIFICATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PERSONNEL

IV. SPECIFICATIONS OF THE EXAMINATION

V. DOCUMENTATION

VI. EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS

VII. RADIATION SAFETY IN IMAGING

VIII. QUALITY CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT, SAFETY, INFECTION CONTROL, AND PATIENT EDUCATION

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

REFERENCES

1. [8416556] Rubin GG, Dake MM, Napel SS, McDonnell CC, Jeffrey RR. Three-dimensional spiral CT angiography of the abdomen: initial clinical experience. Radiology 186:147-52, .
2. [24848958] Rubin GG, Leipsic JJ, Joseph Schoepf UU, Fleischmann DD, Napel SS. CT angiography after 20 years: a transformation in cardiovascular disease characterization continues to advance. Radiology 271:633-52, .
3. [8685335] Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, Miller BH, White CS, Turney SZ. Traumatic aortic injury: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced thoracic CT--five-year experience at a major trauma center. Radiology. 1996;200(2):413-422.
4. [18306857] Peng PP, Spain DD, Tataria MM, Hellinger JJ, Rubin GG, Brundage SS. CT angiography effectively evaluates extremity vascular trauma. Am Surg 74:103-7, .
5. [11906856] Horton KK, Fishman EE. Multidetector CT angiography of pancreatic carcinoma: part I, evaluation of arterial involvement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:827-31, .
6. [11906858] Horton KK, Fishman EE. Multidetector CT angiography of pancreatic carcinoma: part 2, evaluation of venous involvement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:833-6, .
7. [7724766] Rubin GG, Alfrey EE, Dake MM, et al. Assessment of living renal donors with spiral CT. Radiology 195:457-62, .
8. [16100083] Chow LL, Napoli AA, Klein MM, Chang JJ, Rubin GG. Vascular mapping of the leg with multi-detector row CT angiography prior to free-flap transplantation. Radiology 237:353-60, .
9. [10580937] Rouvière OO, Lyonnet DD, Berger PP, Pangaud CC, Gelet AA, Martin XX. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: use of helical CT for preoperative assessment--comparison with intraarterial angiography. Radiology 213:668-73, .
10. [20858812] Blanke P, Euringer W, Baumann T, et al. Combined assessment of aortic root anatomy and aortoiliac vasculature with dual-source CT as a screening tool in patients evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(4):872-881.
11. [22529604] Khambadkone SS. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 5:53-60, .
12. [30182038] Faggioni L, Gabelloni M, Accogli S, et al. Preprocedural planning of transcatheter mitral valve interventions by multidetector CT: What the radiologist needs to know. [Review]. European Journal of Radiology Open. 5:131-140, 2018.Eur J Radiol Open. 5:131-140, 2018.
13. [27807057] van Rosendael PP, Kamperidis VV, Kong WW, et al. Computed tomography for planning transcatheter tricuspid valve therapy. Eur Heart J 38:665-674, .
14. [23096209] Wu WW, Tzeng WW, Wu RR, et al. Comprehensive MDCT evaluation of patients with suspected May-Thurner syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:W638-45, .
15. [-3120926] American College of Radiology. ACR-SPR Practice Parameter for Imaging Pregnant or Potentially Pregnant Patients with Ionizing Radiation. Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=23+&releaseId=2.
16. [-3197716] American College of Radiology. ACR-NASCI-SPR Practice Parameter for the Performance and Interpretation of Cardiac Computed Tomography (CT). Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=166+&releaseId=2
17. [-3188535] American College of Radiology. ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. Manual on Contrast Media. Available at: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Contrast-Manual.
18. [-3197742] American College of Radiology. ACR–SPR Practice Parameter for Performing and Interpreting Diagnostic Computed Tomography (CT). Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=132+&releaseId=2
19. [-3197748] American College of Radiology. ACR–SPR Practice Parameter for the use of Intravascular Contrast Media. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=142+&releaseId=2
20. [23171803] Leone AA, De Caterina AA, Sciahbasi AA, et al. Sodium bicarbonate plus N-acetylcysteine to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in primary and rescue percutaneous coronary interventions: the BINARIO (BIcarbonato e N-Acetil-cisteina nell'infaRto mIocardico acutO) study. EuroIntervention 8:839-47, .
21. [25783425] Zhang BB, Liang LL, Chen WW, Liang CC, Zhang SS. The efficacy of sodium bicarbonate in preventing contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency: a meta-analysis. BMJ Open 5:e006989, .
22. [31141635] Mehran RR, Dangas GG, Weisbord SS. Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury. N Engl J Med 380:2146-2155, .
23. [10831682] Rubin GD, Shiau MC, Leung AN, Kee ST, Logan LJ, Sofilos MC. Aorta and iliac arteries: single versus multiple detector-row helical CT angiography. Radiology. 215(3):670-6, 2000 Jun.
24. [-3197634] American College of Radiology. ACR–AAPM Technical Standard for Diagnostic Medical Physics Performance Monitoring of Computed Tomography (CT) Equipment. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=131+&releaseId=2
25. [27997469] Latson LL, DeAnda AA, Ko JJ. Imaging of the Postsurgical Thoracic Aorta: A State-of-the-Art Review. J Thorac Imaging 32:1-25, .
26. [17766543] Brody AA, Frush DD, Huda WW, Brent RR, . Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 120:677-82, .
27. [14523191] Frush DD, Donnelly LL, Rosen NN. Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 112:951-7, .
28. [17652493] Huda WW. Radiation doses and risks in chest computed tomography examinations. Proc Am Thorac Soc 4:316-20, .
29. [17467387] PatersonAARadiology Department, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK. anniep@unbowed-adsl.demon.co.uk, FrushD PDP. Dose reduction in paediatric MDCT: general principles. Clin Radiol 62:507-17, .
30. [10336201] Calhoun PP, Kuszyk BB, Heath DD, Carley JJ, Fishman EE. Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. Radiographics 19:745-64, .
31. [12235351] Cody DD. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT. Image processing in CT. Radiographics 22:1255-68, .
32. [-3197892] Lipson SA. Image reconstruction and review. In: Lipson SA, ed. MDCT and 3D Workstations. New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media; 2006:30-40.
33. [12239028] Honda OO, Johkoh TT, Yamamoto SS, et al. Comparison of quality of multiplanar reconstructions and direct coronal multidetector CT scans of the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:875-9, .
34. [12676973] Rozenblit AA, Patlas MM, Rosenbaum AA, et al. Detection of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of unenhanced and delayed helical CT acquisitions. Radiology 227:426-33, .
35. [16415129] Fleischmann DD, Hallett RR, Rubin GG. CT angiography of peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:3-26, .
36. [18487532] Lee EE, Boiselle PP, Cleveland RR. Multidetector CT evaluation of congenital lung anomalies. Radiology 247:632-48, .
37. [8753658] Kaste SS, Young CC. Safe use of power injectors with central and peripheral venous access devices for pediatric CT. Pediatr Radiol 26:499-501, .
38. [17312060] Rigsby CK, Gasber E, Seshadri R, Sullivan C, Wyers M, Ben-Ami T. Safety and efficacy of pressure-limited power injection of iodinated contrast medium through central lines in children. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 188(3):726-32, 2007 Mar.
39. [17823851] Greenberg SS, Bhutta SS. A dual contrast injection technique for multidetector computed tomography angiography of Fontan procedures. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:345-8, .
40. [25446326] Sandler KL, Markham LW, Mah ML, Byrum EP, Williams JR. Optimizing CT angiography in patients with Fontan physiology: single-center experience of dual-site power injection. Clin Radiol. 69(12):e562-7, 2014 Dec.
41. [19471914] Prabhu SS, Mahmood SS, Sena LL, Lee EE. MDCT evaluation of pulmonary embolism in children and young adults following a lateral tunnel Fontan procedure: optimizing contrast-enhancement techniques. Pediatr Radiol 39:938-44, .
42. [16702462] Fishman EE, Ney DD, Heath DD, Corl FF, Horton KK, Johnson PP. Volume rendering versus maximum intensity projection in CT angiography: what works best, when, and why. Radiographics 26:905-22, .
43. [20609872] Fleischmann DD. CT angiography: injection and acquisition technique. Radiol Clin North Am 48:237-47, vii, .
44. [19523852] Halpern EJ, Levin DC, Zhang S, Takakuwa KM. Comparison of image quality and arterial enhancement with a dedicated coronary CTA protocol versus a triple rule-out coronary CTA protocol. Acad Radiol. 16(9):1039-48, 2009 Sep.
45. [20308503] Johnson PP, Horton KK, Fishman EE. Optimizing detectability of renal pathology with MDCT: protocols, pearls, and pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1001-12, .
46. [20609871] Kumamaru KK, Hoppel BE, Mather RT, Rybicki FJ. CT angiography: current technology and clinical use. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;48(2):213-235, vii.
47. [22194491] Pierce LL, Raman KK, Rosenberg JJ, Rubin GG. Quality Improvement in 3D Imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:150-5, .
48. [16160104] Horton KK, Talamini MM, Fishman EE. Median arcuate ligament syndrome: evaluation with CT angiography. Radiographics 25:1177-82, .
49. [25884099] White RD, Weir-McCall JR, Sullivan CM, et al. The celiac axis revisited: anatomic variants, pathologic features, and implications for modern endovascular management. [Review]. Radiographics. 35(3):879-98, 2015 May-Jun.
50. [18401623] Frush DD. Pediatric abdominal CT angiography. Pediatr Radiol 38 Suppl 2:S259-66, .
51. [23159007] Sharples NN. An exploration of deaf women's access to mental health nurse education in the United Kingdom. Nurse Educ Today 33:976-80, .
52. [23288014] Meinel FF, Graef AA, Thieme SS, et al. Assessing pulmonary perfusion in emphysema: automated quantification of perfused blood volume in dual-energy CTPA. Invest Radiol 48:79-85, .
53. [26302388] McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Fletcher JG. Dual- and Multi-Energy CT: Principles, Technical Approaches, and Clinical Applications. Radiology. 2015;276(3):637-653.
54. [29131773] Kalisz KK, Halliburton SS, Abbara SS, et al. Update on Cardiovascular Applications of Multienergy CT. Radiographics 37:1955-1974, .
55. [20097097] Sommer WW, Graser AA, Becker CC, et al. Image quality of virtual noncontrast images derived from dual-energy CT angiography after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21:315-21, .
56. [22149820] Yu LL, Christner JJ, Leng SS, Wang JJ, Fletcher JJ, McCollough CC. Virtual monochromatic imaging in dual-source dual-energy CT: radiation dose and image quality. Med Phys 38:6371-9, .
57. [23096210] Schulz B, Kuehling K, Kromen W, et al. Automatic bone removal technique in whole-body dual-energy CT angiography: performance and image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 199(5):W646-50, 2012 Nov.
58. [19000866] Pontana FF, Faivre JJ, Remy-Jardin MM, et al. Lung perfusion with dual-energy multidetector-row CT (MDCT): feasibility for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism in 117 consecutive patients. Acad Radiol 15:1494-504, .
59. [-3197621] American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Parameter for Communication of Diagnostic Imaging Findings. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=74+&releaseId=2