PPTS Portal Home
Revised 2021 (Resolution 44)
Document Navigator
All
PREAMBLE
I. INTRODUCTION
II. INDICATIONS
III. QUALIFICATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PERSONNEL
IV. SAFETY GUIDELINES AND POSSIBLE CONTRAINDICATIONS
V. SPECIFICATIONS OF THE EXAMINATION
VI. DOCUMENTATION
VII. EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
VIII. QUALITY CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT, SAFETY, INFECTION CONTROL, AND PATIENT EDUCATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
Document Navigator
ACR–SPR–SSR PRACTICE PARAMETER FOR THE PERFORMANCE AND INTERPRETATION OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) OF THE ANKLE AND HINDFOOT
PREAMBLE
I. INTRODUCTION
II. INDICATIONS
III. QUALIFICATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PERSONNEL
IV. SAFETY GUIDELINES AND POSSIBLE CONTRAINDICATIONS
V. SPECIFICATIONS OF THE EXAMINATION
VI. DOCUMENTATION
VII. EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
VIII. QUALITY CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT, SAFETY, INFECTION CONTROL, AND PATIENT EDUCATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
1. [8888251]
Anzilotti KK, Schweitzer MM, Hecht PP, Wapner KK, Kahn MM, Ross MM. Effect of foot and ankle MR imaging on clinical decision making. Radiology 201:515-7, .
2. [17056924]
Bearcroft PP, Guy SS, Bradley MM, Robinson FF. MRI of the ankle: effect on diagnostic confidence and patient management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1327-31, .
3. [1634154]
Conti SS, Michelson JJ, Jahss MM. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative planning for reconstruction of posterior tibial tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle 13:208-14, .
4. [12384944]
Greenstein AA, Marzo-Ortega HH, Emery PP, O'Connor PP, McGonagle DD. Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of progressive joint destruction in neuropathic joint disease. Arthritis Rheum 46:2814-5, .
5. [17475142]
Nicholson CC, Berlet GG, Lee TT. Prediction of the success of nonoperative treatment of insertional Achilles tendinosis based on MRI. Foot Ankle Int 28:472-7, .
6. [18443275]
Takao MM, Innami KK, Matsushita TT, Uchio YY, Ochi MM. Arthroscopic and magnetic resonance image appearance and reconstruction of the anterior talofibular ligament in cases of apparent functional ankle instability. Am J Sports Med 36:1542-7, .
7. [9060098]
Zanetti MM, De Simoni CC, Wetz HH, Zollinger HH, Hodler JJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of injuries to the ankle joint: can it predict clinical outcome?. Skeletal Radiol 26:82-8, .
8. [17296133]
Tocci SL, Madom IA, Bradley MP, Langer PR, DiGiovanni CW. The diagnostic value of MRI in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 28(2):166-8, 2007 Feb.
9. [9467193]
Groshar DD, Gorenberg MM, Ben-Haim SS, Jerusalmi JJ, Liberson AA. Lower extremity scintigraphy: the foot and ankle. Semin Nucl Med 28:62-77, .
10. [18021580]
Cooper AA, Mizel MM, Patel PP, Steinmetz NN, Clifford PP. Comparison of MRI and local anesthetic tendon sheath injection in the diagnosis of posterior tibial tendon tenosynovitis. Foot Ankle Int 28:1124-7, .
11. [14976839]
Newman JS.. Diagnostic and therapeutic injections of the foot and ankle. [Review] [21 refs]. Semin Roentgenol. 39(1):85-94, 2004 Jan.
12. [11795729]
Sugimoto KK, Takakura YY, Samoto NN, Nakayama SS, Tanaka YY. Subtalar arthrography in recurrent instability of the ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 394:169-76, .
13. [25590397]
Taljanovic MS, Alcala JN, Gimber LH, Rieke JD, Chilvers MM, Latt LD. High-resolution US and MR imaging of peroneal tendon injuries. [Review][Erratum appears in Radiographics. 2015 Mar-Apr;35(2):651; PMID: 25763746]. Radiographics. 35(1):179-99, 2015 Jan-Feb.
14. [25590396]
Sconfienza LM, Orlandi D, Lacelli F, Serafini G, Silvestri E. Dynamic high-resolution US of ankle and midfoot ligaments: normal anatomic structure and imaging technique. [Review]. Radiographics. 35(1):164-78, 2015 Jan-Feb.
15. [18095247]
Khoury V, Guillin R, Dhanju J, Cardinal E. Ultrasound of ankle and foot: overuse and sports injuries. [Review] [119 refs]. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 11(2):149-61, 2007 Jun.
16. [14976840]
Schreibman KK. Ankle tenography: what, how, and why. Semin Roentgenol 39:95-113, .
17. [19685050]
Oae K, Takao M, Uchio Y, Ochi M. Evaluation of anterior talofibular ligament injury with stress radiography, ultrasonography and MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 2010;39(1):41-47.
18. [15046440]
Cutler L, Molloy A, Dhukuram V, Bass A. Do CT scans aid assessment of distal tibial physeal fractures?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 86(2):239-43, 2004 Mar.
19. [15333345]
Haapamaki VV, Kiuru MJ, Koskinen SK. Ankle and foot injuries: analysis of MDCT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 183(3):615-22, 2004 Sep.
20. [10963427]
Hochman M, Reed MH. Features of calcaneonavicular coalition on coronal computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol. 29(7):409-12, 2000 Jul.
21. [12728332]
Linsenmaier U, Brunner U, Schoning A, et al. Classification of calcaneal fractures by spiral computed tomography: implications for surgical treatment. Eur Radiol. 13(10):2315-22, 2003 Oct.
22. [19321100]
Rubino RR, Valderrabano VV, Sutter PP, Regazzoni PP. Prognostic value of four classifications of calcaneal fractures. Foot Ankle Int 30:229-38, .
23. [15686236]
Verhagen RA, Maas M, Dijkgraaf MG, Tol JL, Krips R, van Dijk CN. Prospective study on diagnostic strategies in osteochondral lesions of the talus. Is MRI superior to helical CT? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(1):41-46.
24. [8416606]
Kiss ZZ, Khan KK, Fuller PP. Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular bone: CT findings in 55 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:111-5, .
25. [3357960]
Rosenberg ZZ, Jahss MM, Noto AA, et al. Rupture of the posterior tibial tendon: CT and surgical findings. Radiology 167:489-93, .
26. [15026585]
Choplin RH, Buckwalter KA, Rydberg J, Farber JM. CT with 3D rendering of the tendons of the foot and ankle: technique, normal anatomy, and disease. [Review] [13 refs]. Radiographics. 24(2):343-56, 2004 Mar-Apr.
27. [11264092]
Pelc JS, Beaulieu CF. Volume rendering of tendon-bone relationships using unenhanced CT. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 176(4):973-7, 2001 Apr.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 176(4):973-7, 2001 Apr.
28. [12682790]
Schmid MR, Pfirrmann CW, Hodler J, Vienne P, Zanetti M. Cartilage lesions in the ankle joint: comparison of MR arthrography and CT arthrography. Skeletal Radiol. 32(5):259-65, 2003 May.
29. [10882283]
Karjalainen PP, Soila KK, Aronen HH, et al. MR imaging of overuse injuries of the Achilles tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:251-60, .
30. [9419569]
Koivunen-Niemelä TT, Komu MM, Viikari JJ, Alanen AA. Magnetic resonance imaging of Achilles tendon xanthomas using a fat-water discrimination technique at 0.1 T. Acad Radiol 2:319-23, .
31. [12076933]
Marshall HH, Howarth CC, Larkman DD, Herlihy AA, Oatridge AA, Bydder GG. Contrast-enhanced magic-angle MR imaging of the Achilles tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:187-92, .
32. [10954440]
Schweitzer ME, Karasick D. MR imaging of disorders of the Achilles tendon. [Review] [76 refs]. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 175(3):613-25, 2000 Sep.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 175(3):613-25, 2000 Sep.
33. [11350284]
Shalabi AA, Kristoffersen-Wiberg MM, Aspelin PP, Movin TT. MR evaluation of chronic Achilles tendinosis. A longitudinal study of 15 patients preoperatively and two years postoperatively. Acta Radiol 42:269-76, .
34. [9308473]
Bencardino JJ, Rosenberg ZZ, Beltran JJ, et al. MR imaging of dislocation of the posterior tibial tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1109-12, .
35. [12966596]
Bouysset M, Tebib J, Tavernier T, et al. Posterior tibial tendon and subtalar joint complex in rheumatoid arthritis: magnetic resonance imaging study. J Rheumatol. 30(9):1951-4, 2003 Sep.
36. [8751680]
Khoury NN, el-Khoury GG, Saltzman CC, Brandser EE. MR imaging of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:675-82, .
37. [15895226]
Nallamshetty L, Nazarian LN, Schweitzer ME, et al. Evaluation of posterior tibial pathology: comparison of sonography and MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34(7):375-380.
38. [11756125]
Premkumar AA, Perry MM, Dwyer AA, et al. Sonography and MR imaging of posterior tibial tendinopathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:223-32, .
39. [19696280]
Donovan AA, Rosenberg ZZ. Extraarticular lateral hindfoot impingement with posterior tibial tendon tear: MRI correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:672-8, .
40. [8756941]
Khoury NN, el-Khoury GG, Saltzman CC, Kathol MM. Peroneus longus and brevis tendon tears: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 200:833-41, .
41. [10715033]
Rademaker J, Rosenberg ZS, Delfaut EM, Cheung YY, Schweitzer ME. Tear of the peroneus longus tendon: MR imaging features in nine patients. Radiology. 214(3):700-4, 2000 Mar.
42. [8976937]
Rosenberg ZZ, Beltran JJ, Cheung YY, Colon EE, Herraiz FF. MR features of longitudinal tears of the peroneus brevis tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:141-7, .
43. [14627572]
Rosenberg ZZ, Bencardino JJ, Astion DD, Schweitzer MM, Rokito AA, Sheskier SS. MRI features of chronic injuries of the superior peroneal retinaculum. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1551-7, .
44. [19912714]
Beischer AA, Beamond BB, Jowett AA, O'Sullivan RR. Distal tendinosis of the tibialis anterior tendon. Foot Ankle Int 30:1053-9, .
45. [7641506]
Bouysset MM, Tavernier TT, Tebib JJ, et al. CT and MRI evaluation of tenosynovitis of the rheumatoid hindfoot. Clin Rheumatol 14:303-7, .
46. [14605772]
Gallo RR, Kolman BB, Daffner RR, Sciulli RR, Roberts CC, DeMeo PP. MRI of tibialis anterior tendon rupture. Skeletal Radiol 33:102-6, .
47. [11312169]
Lo LD, Schweitzer ME, Fan JK, Wapner KL, Hecht PJ. MR imaging findings of entrapment of the flexor hallucis longus tendon. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 176(5):1145-8, 2001 May.
48. [15860676]
Mengiardi BB, Pfirrmann CC, Vienne PP, et al. Anterior tibial tendon abnormalities: MR imaging findings. Radiology 235:977-84, .
49. [19038607]
Cerezal L, Llopis E, Canga A, Rolón A. MR arthrography of the ankle: indications and technique. Radiol Clin North Am. 2008 Nov;46(6):973-94, v.
50. [14684526]
Brown KK, Morrison WW, Schweitzer MM, Parellada JJ, Nothnagel HH. MRI findings associated with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:131-6, .
51. [8208935]
Chandnani VV, Harper MM, Ficke JJ, et al. Chronic ankle instability: evaluation with MR arthrography, MR imaging, and stress radiography. Radiology 192:189-94, .
52. [17185669]
Kim SS, Huh YY, Song HH, et al. Chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injury of ankle: evaluation with contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed 3D fast spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state MR imaging. Radiology 242:225-35, .
53. [8310930]
Klein MM. MR imaging of the ankle: normal and abnormal findings in the medial collateral ligament. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:377-83, .
54. [7584238]
Mesgarzadeh MM, Schneck CC, Tehranzadeh JJ, Chandnani VV, Bonakdarpour AA. Magnetic resonance imaging of ankle ligaments. Emphasis on anatomy and injuries to lateral collateral ligaments. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2:39-58, .
55. [12616009]
Oae K, Takao M, Naito K, et al. Injury of the tibiofibular syndesmosis: value of MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology. 2003;227(1):155-161.
56. [15855099]
Toye LR, Helms CA, Hoffman BD, Easley M, Nunley JA. MRI of spring ligament tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 184(5):1475-80, 2005 May.
57. [12435647]
Uys HH, Rijke AA. Clinical association of acute lateral ankle sprain with syndesmotic involvement: a stress radiography and magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med 30:816-22, .
58. [25539277]
Crim J, Longenecker LG. MRI and surgical findings in deltoid ligament tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 204(1):W63-9, 2015 Jan.
59. [10796931]
Bureau NJ, Cardinal E, Hobden R, Aubin B. Posterior ankle impingement syndrome: MR imaging findings in seven patients. Radiology. 2000;215(2):497-503.
60. [18838849]
Choo HH, Suh JJ, Kim SS, Huh YY, Kim MM, Lee JJ. Ankle MRI for anterolateral soft tissue impingement: increased accuracy with the use of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed 3D-FSPGR MRI. Korean J Radiol 9:409-15, .
61. [16949527]
Duncan D, Mologne T, Hildebrand H, Stanley M, Schreckengaust R, Sitler D. The usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of anterolateral impingement of the ankle. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006;45(5):304-307.
62. [18509795]
Lee JJ, Calder JJ, Healy JJ. Posterior impingement syndromes of the ankle. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 12:154-69, .
63. [16362423]
Messiou C, Robinson P, O'Connor PJ, Grainger A. Subacute posteromedial impingement of the ankle in athletes: MR imaging evaluation and ultrasound guided therapy. Skeletal Radiol. 35(2):88-94, 2006 Feb.
64. [11856682]
Robinson P, White LM, Salonen D, Ogilvie-Harris D. Anteromedial impingement of the ankle: using MR arthrography to assess the anteromedial recess. AJR. 2002;178(3):601-604.
65. [11568338]
Robinson P, White LM, Salonen DC, Daniels TR, Ogilvie-Harris D. Anterolateral ankle impingement: mr arthrographic assessment of the anterolateral recess. Radiology. 2001;221(1):186-190.
66. [17912512]
Subhas NN, Vinson EE, Cothran RR, Santangelo JJ, Nunley JJ, Helms CC. MRI appearance of surgically proven abnormal accessory anterior-inferior tibiofibular ligament (Bassett's ligament). Skeletal Radiol 37:27-33, .
67. [20729435]
Donovan A, Rosenberg ZS. MRI of ankle and lateral hindfoot impingement syndromes. [Review] [74 refs]. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 195(3):595-604, 2010 Sep.
68. [11044029]
Bui-Mansfield LT, Kline M, Chew FS, Rogers LF, Lenchik L. Osteochondritis dissecans of the tibial plafond: imaging characteristics and a review of the literature. AJR. 2000;175(5):1305-1308.
69. [18779951]
Lee KB, Bai LB, Park JG, Yoon TR. A comparison of arthroscopic and MRI findings in staging of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(11):1047-1051.
70. [9574590]
Magee TT, Hinson GG. Usefulness of MR imaging in the detection of talar dome injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1227-30, .
71. [19038608]
Naran KN, Zoga AC. Osteochondral lesions about the ankle. [Review] [16 refs]. Radiol Clin North Am. 46(6):995-1002, v, 2008 Nov.
72. [23199853]
Bae SS, Lee HH, Lee KK, et al. Comparison of arthroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging findings in osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Int 33:1058-62, .
73. [21826613]
Griffith JF, Lau DT, Yeung DK, Wong MW. High-resolution MR imaging of talar osteochondral lesions with new classification. Skeletal Radiol. 2012; 41(4):387-399.
74. [25253576]
Gatlin CC, Matheny LL, Ho CC, Johnson NN, Clanton TT. Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of articular cartilage lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Int 36:288-92, .
75. [18440482]
Allen JJ, Greer BB, Sorge DD, Campbell SS. MR imaging of neuropathies of the leg, ankle, and foot. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 16:117-31, vii, .
76. [18602827]
Chung KW, Suh BC, Shy ME, et al. Different clinical and magnetic resonance imaging features between Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A and 2A. Neuromuscul Disord. 18(8):610-8, 2008 Aug.
77. [12740464]
Delfaut EM, Demondion X, Bieganski A, Thiron MC, Mestdagh H, Cotten A. Imaging of foot and ankle nerve entrapment syndromes: from well-demonstrated to unfamiliar sites. [Review] [31 refs]. Radiographics. 23(3):613-23, 2003 May-Jun.
78. [7584240]
Finkel JJ. Tarsal tunnel syndrome. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2:67-78, .
79. [8491431]
Frey C, Kerr R. Magnetic resonance imaging and the evaluation of tarsal tunnel syndrome. Foot Ankle. 1993;14(3):159-164.
80. [23125929]
Dong Q, Jacobson JA, Jamadar DA, et al. Entrapment neuropathies in the upper and lower limbs: anatomy and MRI features. Radiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:230679.
81. [10470906]
Grasel RP, Schweitzer ME, Kovalovich AM, et al. MR imaging of plantar fasciitis: edema, tears, and occult marrow abnormalities correlated with outcome. AJR. 1999;173(3):699-701.
82. [19664484]
Jeswani T, Morlese J, McNally EG. Getting to the heel of the problem: plantar fascia lesions. [Review] [26 refs]. Clin Radiol. 64(9):931-9, 2009 Sep.
83. [11000294]
Yu JS.. Pathologic and post-operative conditions of the plantar fascia: review of MR imaging appearances. [Review] [55 refs]. Skeletal Radiol. 29(9):491-501, 2000 Sep.
84. [10524852]
Yu JJ, Spigos DD, Tomczak RR. Foot pain after a plantar fasciotomy: an MR analysis to determine potential causes. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:707-12, .
85. [11376274]
Lektrakul NN, Chung CC, Lai Ym , et al. Tarsal sinus: arthrographic, MR imaging, MR arthrographic, and pathologic findings in cadavers and retrospective study data in patients with sinus tarsi syndrome. Radiology 219:802-10, .
86. [9574592]
Bottger BB, Schweitzer MM, El-Noueam KK, Desai MM. MR imaging of the normal and abnormal retrocalcaneal bursae. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1239-41, .
87. [12810213]
Maillefert JF, Dardel P, Cherasse A, Mistrih R, Krause D, Tavernier C. Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of synovial inflammation of the hindfoot in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other polyarthritis. Eur J Radiol. 47(1):1-5, 2003 Jul.
88. [10509687]
Rochwerger AA, Groulier PP, Curvale GG, Launay FF. Pigmented villonodular synovitis of the foot and ankle: a report of eight cases. Foot Ankle Int 20:587-90, .
89. [11599072]
Weishaupt DD, Schweitzer MM, Morrison WW, Haims AA, Wapner KK, Kahn MM. MRI of the foot and ankle: prevalence and distribution of occult and palpable ganglia. J Magn Reson Imaging 14:464-71, .
90. [18371230]
Elias I, Zoga AC, Raikin SM, et al. Bone stress injury of the ankle in professional ballet dancers seen on MRI. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 9:39, 2008 Mar 28.
91. [12679846]
Fernandez-Canton GG, Casado OO, Capelastegui AA, Astigarraga EE, Larena JJ, Merino AA. Bone marrow edema syndrome of the foot: one year follow-up with MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol 32:273-8, .
92. [12147843]
Schmid MM, Hodler JJ, Vienne PP, Binkert CC, Zanetti MM. Bone marrow abnormalities of foot and ankle: STIR versus T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology 224:463-9, .
93. [11090408]
Sijbrandij ES, van Gils AP, Louwerens JW, de Lange EE. Posttraumatic subchondral bone contusions and fractures of the talotibial joint: occurrence of "kissing" lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 175(6):1707-10, 2000 Dec.
94. [11756724]
Zanetti MM, Steiner CC, Seifert BB, Hodler JJ. Clinical outcome of edema-like bone marrow abnormalities of the foot. Radiology 222:184-8, .
95. [11694426]
Beltran J, Shankman S. MR imaging of bone lesions of the ankle and foot. [Review] [101 refs]. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 9(3):553-66, xi, 2001 Aug.
96. [19020212]
Lee IS, Choi JA, Oh JH, et al. Microscopy coil for preoperative MRI of small soft-tissue masses of the hand and foot: comparison with conventional surface coil. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 191(6):W256-63, 2008 Dec.
97. [9821196]
Llauger JJ, Palmer JJ, Monill JJ, Franquet TT, Bagué SS, Rosón NN. MR imaging of benign soft-tissue masses of the foot and ankle. Radiographics 18:1481-98, .
98. [11694431]
Maldjian C, Rosenberg ZS. MR imaging features of tumors of the ankle and foot. [Review] [47 refs]. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 9(3):639-57, xii, 2001 Aug.
99. [23385516]
Ganguly A, Aniq H, Skiadas B. Lumps and bumps around the foot and ankle: an assessment of frequency with ultrasound and MRI. Skeletal Radiol. 42(8):1051-60, 2013 Aug.
100. [12202694]
Ledermann HP, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME. Pedal abscesses in patients suspected of having pedal osteomyelitis: analysis with MR imaging. Radiology. 224(3):649-55, 2002 Sep.
101. [12239042]
Ledermann HP, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Raikin SM. Tendon involvement in pedal infection: MR analysis of frequency, distribution, and spread of infection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 179(4):939-47, 2002 Oct.
102. [25027638]
Godoy-Santos AA, Bordalo-Rodrigues MM, Rosemberg LL, et al. Kager's fat pad inflammation associated with HIV infection and AIDS: MRI findings. Skeletal Radiol 43:1257-62, .
103. [22851328]
Chan VV, Morrison WW, Kavanagh EE. Postoperative infection in the foot and ankle. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 16:241-53, .
104. [10068013]
Cahuzac JJ, Baunin CC, Luu SS, Estivalezes EE, Sales de Gauzy JJ, Hobatho MM. Assessment of hindfoot deformity by three-dimensional MRI in infant club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:97-101, .
105. [11694421]
Cheung YY, Rosenberg ZZ. MR imaging of the accessory muscles around the ankle. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 9:465-73, x, .
106. [7754020]
Miller TT, Staron RB, Feldman F, Parisien M, Glucksman WJ, Gandolfo LH. The symptomatic accessory tarsal navicular bone: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology. 1995;195(3):849-853.
107. [10715334]
Newman JS, Newberg AH. Congenital tarsal coalition: multimodality evaluation with emphasis on CT and MR imaging. Radiographics. 20(2):321-32; quiz 526-7, 532, 2000 Mar-Apr.
108. [19524201]
Patel CV.. The foot and ankle: MR imaging of uniquely pediatric disorders. [Review] [51 refs]. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 17(3):539-47, vii, 2009 Aug.
109. [14653594]
Zammit JJ, Singh DD. The peroneus quartus muscle. Anatomy and clinical relevance. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:1134-7, .
110. [8688245]
Lehtinen AA, Paimela LL, Kreula JJ, Leirisalo-Repo MM, Taavitsainen MM. Painful ankle region in rheumatoid arthritis. Analysis of soft-tissue changes with ultrasonography and MR imaging. Acta Radiol 37:572-7, .
111. [17997068]
Erdem CZ, Tekin NS, Sarikaya S, Erdem LO, Gulec S. MR imaging features of foot involvement in patients with psoriasis. Eur J Radiol. 67(3):521-5, 2008 Sep.
112. [17466479]
Eshed I, Althoff CE, Feist E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of hindfoot involvement in patients with spondyloarthritides: comparison of low-field and high-field strength units. Eur J Radiol. 65(1):140-7, 2008 Jan.
113. [10653360]
Weishaupt D, Schweitzer ME, Alam F, Karasick D, Wapner K. MR imaging of inflammatory joint diseases of the foot and ankle. Skeletal Radiol 28:663-9, 1999 Dec.
114. [9016240]
Yu JJ, Chung CC, Recht MM, Dailiana TT, Jurdi RR. MR imaging of tophaceous gout. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:523-7, .
115. [19038615]
Bancroft LW, Peterson JJ, Kransdorf MJ. Imaging of soft tissue lesions of the foot and ankle. [Review] [39 refs]. Radiol Clin North Am. 46(6):1093-103, vii, 2008 Nov.
116. [-3197749]
American College of Radiology. ACR-SPR-SSR Practice Parameter for the Performance and Interpretation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Bone and Soft-Tissue Tumors. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=88+&releaseId=2
117. [8615270]
Petit PP, Panuel MM, Faure FF, et al. Acute fracture of the distal tibial physis: role of gradient-echo MR imaging versus plain film examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:1203-6, .
118. [9930806]
Robbins MM, Wilson MM, Sella EE. MR imaging of anterosuperior calcaneal process fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:475-9, .
119. [7480689]
Umans HH, Pavlov HH. Insufficiency fracture of the talus: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 197:439-42, .
120. [15618381]
Nikken JJ, Oei EH, Ginai AZ, et al. Acute ankle trauma: value of a short dedicated extremity MR imaging examination in prediction of need for treatment. Radiology. 2005;234(1):134-142.
121. [9840199]
Tochigi YY, Yoshinaga KK, Wada YY, Moriya HH. Acute inversion injury of the ankle: magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes. Foot Ankle Int 19:730-4, .
122. [15138726]
Anderson SS, Weber MM, Steinbach LL, Ballmer FF. Shoe rim and shoe buckle pseudotumor of the ankle in elite and professional figure skaters and snowboarders: MR imaging findings. Skeletal Radiol 33:325-9, .
123. [12118826]
Dunfee WR, Dalinka MK, Kneeland JB. Imaging of athletic injuries to the ankle and foot. [Review] [49 refs]. Radiol Clin North Am. 40(2):289-312, vii, 2002 Mar.
124. [15151980]
Hillier JC, Peace K, Hulme A, Healy JC. Pictorial review: MRI features of foot and ankle injuries in ballet dancers. [Review] [10 refs]. Br J Radiol. 77(918):532-7, 2004 Jun.
125. [12916892]
Zoga AC, Schweitzer ME. Imaging sports injuries of the foot and ankle. [Review] [31 refs]. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 11(2):295-310, 2003 May.
126. [19016397]
Alparslan LL, Chiodo CC. Lateral ankle instability: MR imaging of associated injuries and surgical treatment procedures. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 12:346-58, .
127. [25085232]
Kanamoto TT, Shiozaki YY, Tanaka YY, Yonetani YY, Horibe SS. The use of MRI in pre-operative evaluation of anterior talofibular ligament in chronic ankle instability. Bone Joint Res 3:241-5, .
128. [15256624]
Chien AJ, Jacobson JA, Jamadar DA, Brigido MK, Femino JE, Hayes CW. Imaging appearances of lateral ankle ligament reconstruction. Radiographics. 2004;24(4):999-1008.
129. [2003444]
Liem MM, Zegel HH, Balduini FF, Turner MM, Becker JJ, Caballero-Saez AA. Repair of Achilles tendon ruptures with a polylactic acid implant: assessment with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:769-73, .
130. [1997244]
Zeiss JJ, Fenton PP, Ebraheim NN, Coombs RR. Magnetic resonance imaging for ineffectual tarsal tunnel surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 264:264-6, .
131. [20539960]
Zanetti M, Saupe N, Espinosa N. Postoperative MR imaging of the foot and ankle: tendon repair, ligament repair, and Morton's neuroma resection. [Review] [26 refs]. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 14(3):357-64, 2010 Sep.
132. [8141017]
Bude RR, Adler RR, Bassett DD. Diagnosis of Achilles tendon xanthoma in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: MR vs sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:913-7, .
133. [7839978]
Dussault RR, Kaplan PP, Roederer GG. MR imaging of Achilles tendon in patients with familial hyperlipidemia: comparison with plain films, physical examination, and patients with traumatic tendon lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:403-7, .
134. [-3098654]
American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Parameter for Performing and Interpreting Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=146+&releaseId=2
135. [-3188538]
American College of Radiology. ACR Committee on MR Safety. 2024 ACR Manual on MR Safety. Available at: https://edge.sitecorecloud.io/americancoldf5f-acrorgf92a-productioncb02-3650/media/ACR/Files/Clinical/Radiology-Safety/Manual-on-MR-Safety.pdf.
136. [-3197839]
Shellock FG. Reference Manual for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Implants, and Devices. Playa Del Rey, CA Biomedical Research Publishing Group; 2013.
137. [15284433]
Shellock FG, Crues JV. MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology. 2004 Sep;232(3):635-52.
138. [-3188535]
American College of Radiology. ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. Manual on Contrast Media. Available at: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Contrast-Manual.
139. [-3197748]
American College of Radiology. ACR–SPR Practice Parameter for the use of Intravascular Contrast Media. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=142+&releaseId=2
140. [-3197619]
American College of Radiology. ACR–SIR Practice Parameter For Minimal and/or Moderate Sedation/Analgesia. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=95+&releaseId=2
141. [28570096]
Siriwanarangsun P, Bae WC, Statum S, Chung CB. Advanced MRI Techniques for the Ankle. [Review]. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. 209(3):511-524, 2017 Sep.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 209(3):511-524, 2017 Sep.
142. [16530633]
Ramnath RR. 3T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system (Part I): considerations, coils, and challenges. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006 Feb;14(1):27-40.
143. [17061070]
Barr CC, Bauer JJ, Malfair DD, et al. MR imaging of the ankle at 3 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla: protocol optimization and application to cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in cadaver specimens. Eur Radiol 17:1518-28, .
144. [16036161]
Schibany NN, Ba-Ssalamah AA, Marlovits SS, et al. Impact of high field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging on diagnosis of osteochondral defects in the ankle joint. Eur J Radiol 55:283-8, .
145. [6701302]
Crooks LL, Arakawa MM, Hoenninger JJ, McCarten BB, Watts JJ, Kaufman LL. Magnetic resonance imaging: effects of magnetic field strength. Radiology 151:127-33, .
146. [9393511]
Erickson SJ. High-resolution imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiology. 1997 Dec;205(3):593-618.
147. [10756998]
Hottya GA, Peterfy CG, Uffmann M, et al. Dedicated extremity MR imaging of the foot and ankle. [Review] [14 refs]. Eur Radiol. 10(3):467-75, 2000.
148. [9626891]
Verhoek GG, Zanetti MM, Duewell SS, Zollinger HH, Hodler JJ. MRI of the foot and ankle: diagnostic performance and patient acceptance of a dedicated low field MR scanner. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:711-6, .
149. [3487956]
Kulkarni MM, Patton JJ, Price RR. Technical considerations for the use of surface coils in MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 147:373-8, .
150. [-3197960]
Rubin DA. MR imaging technique and principles. In: Spounge AR, Pope TL, ed. Practical MRI of the Foot and Ankle. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press LLC; 2001:1-36.
151. [10336197]
Muhle CC, Frank LL, Rand TT, et al. Collateral ligaments of the ankle: high-resolution MR imaging with a local gradient coil and anatomic correlation in cadavers. Radiographics 19:673-83, .
152. [7976893]
Rubin DA, Kneeland JB. MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system: technical considerations for enhancing image quality and diagnostic yield. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Nov;163(5):1155-63.
153. [10627683]
Feighan JJ, Towers JJ, Conti SS. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 365:23-38, .
154. [16568266]
Mengiardi BB, Pfirrmann CC, Schöttle PP, et al. Magic angle effect in MR imaging of ankle tendons: influence of foot positioning on prevalence and site in asymptomatic subjects and cadaveric tendons. Eur Radiol 16:2197-206, .
155. [17144956]
Tokuda OO, Awaya HH, Taguchi KK, Matsunga NN. Kinematic MRI of the normal ankle ligaments using a specially designed passive positioning device. Foot Ankle Int 27:935-42, .
156. [6463267]
Hricak HH, Amparo EE. Body MRI: alleviation of claustrophobia by prone positioning. Radiology 152:819, .
157. [8615247]
Rubin DD, Towers JJ, Britton CC. MR imaging of the foot: utility of complex oblique imaging planes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:1079-84, .
158. [8372769]
Klein MM. Reformatted three-dimensional Fourier transform gradient-recalled echo MR imaging of the ankle: spectrum of normal and abnormal findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161:831-6, .
159. [17043738]
Duc SS, Mengiardi BB, Pfirrmann CC, Hodler JJ, Zanetti MM. Improved visualization of collateral ligaments of the ankle: multiplanar reconstructions based on standard 2D turbo spin-echo MR images. Eur Radiol 17:1162-71, .
160. [10430128]
Soila KK, Karjalainen PP, Aronen HH, Pihlajamäki HH, Tirman PP. High-resolution MR imaging of the asymptomatic Achilles tendon: new observations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:323-8, .
161. [10663582]
Bush CH. The magnetic resonance imaging of musculoskeletal hemorrhage. Skeletal Radiol. 2000 Jan;29(1):1-9.
162. [12203770]
Ba-Ssalamah AA, Schibany NN, Puig SS, Herneth AA, Noebauer-Huhmann II, Trattnig SS. Imaging articular cartilage defects in the ankle joint with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:209-16, .
163. [8958622]
Tan TT, Wilcox DD, Frank LL, et al. MR imaging of articular cartilage in the ankle: comparison of available imaging sequences and methods of measurement in cadavers. Skeletal Radiol 25:749-55, .
164. [18794322]
Murphey MM, Rhee JJ, Lewis RR, Fanburg-Smith JJ, Flemming DD, Walker EE. Pigmented villonodular synovitis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 28:1493-518, .
165. [9574591]
Jacobson JJ, Andresen RR, Jaovisidha SS, et al. Detection of ankle effusions: comparison study in cadavers using radiography, sonography, and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1231-8, .
166. [14696227]
Huh YM, Suh JS, Lee JW, Song HT. Synovitis and soft tissue impingement of the ankle: assessment with enhanced three-dimensional FSPGR MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19(1):108-116.
167. [28267547]
Kirchgesner T, Perlepe V, Michoux N, Larbi A, Vande Berg B. Fat suppression at 2D MR imaging of the hands: Dixon method versus CHESS technique and STIR sequence. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Apr;89():S0720-048X(17)30015-3.
168. [2014300]
Fleckenstein JJ, Archer BB, Barker BB, Vaughan JJ, Parkey RR, Peshock RR. Fast short-tau inversion-recovery MR imaging. Radiology 179:499-504, .
169. [17114534]
Fuller SS, Reeder SS, Shimakawa AA, et al. Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL) fast spin-echo imaging of the ankle: initial clinical experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1442-7, .
170. [16217786]
Lu AA, Grist TT, Block WW. Fat/water separation in single acquisition steady-state free precession using multiple echo radial trajectories. Magn Reson Med 54:1051-7, .
171. [9885606]
Maas MM, Dijkstra PP, Akkerman EE. Uniform fat suppression in hands and feet through the use of two-point Dixon chemical shift MR imaging. Radiology 210:189-93, .
172. [17326087]
Reeder SS, McKenzie CC, Pineda AA, et al. Water-fat separation with IDEAL gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:644-52, .
173. [19097201]
Huo DD, Li ZZ, Aboussouan EE, Karis JJ, Pipe JJ. Turboprop IDEAL: a motion-resistant fat-water separation technique. Magn Reson Med 61:188-95, .
174. [2704821]
Simon JJ, Szumowski JJ. Chemical shift imaging with paramagnetic contrast material enhancement for improved lesion depiction. Radiology 171:539-43, .
175. [17579177]
Bauer JJ, Banerjee SS, Henning TT, Krug RR, Majumdar SS, Link TT. Fast high-spatial-resolution MRI of the ankle with parallel imaging using GRAPPA at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:240-5, .
176. [19011194]
Stevens KK, Busse RR, Han EE, et al. Ankle: isotropic MR imaging with 3D-FSE-cube--initial experience in healthy volunteers. Radiology 249:1026-33, .
177. [11392291]
Peh WC, Chan JH. Artifacts in musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging: identification and correction. Skeletal Radiol. 2001 Apr;30(4):179-91.
178. [3357972]
Van Hecke PE, Marchal GJ, Baert AL. Use of shielding to prevent folding in MR imaging. Radiology. 1988 May;167(2):557-8.
179. [3495155]
Haacke EM, Lenz GW. Improving MR image quality in the presence of motion by using rephasing gradients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Jun;148(6):1251-8.
180. [19022600]
Du JJ, Pak BB, Znamirowski RR, et al. Magic angle effect in magnetic resonance imaging of the Achilles tendon and enthesis. Magn Reson Imaging 27:557-64, .
181. [1924777]
Erickson SS, Cox II, Hyde JJ, Carrera GG, Strandt JJ, Estkowski LL. Effect of tendon orientation on MR imaging signal intensity: a manifestation of the "magic angle" phenomenon. Radiology 181:389-92, .
182. [9534696]
Peh WW, Chan JJ. The magic angle phenomenon in tendons: effect of varying the MR echo time. Br J Radiol 71:31-6, .
183. [12525938]
Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Gebhard M, Wohlgemuth WA, et al. MR arthrography: pharmacology, efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Skeletal Radiol. 2003 Jan;32(1):1-12.
184. [-3197621]
American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Parameter for Communication of Diagnostic Imaging Findings. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=74+&releaseId=2
185. [-3197844]
Shellock FG. Guide to MR Procedures and Metallic Objects: Update 2001. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
186. [18806156]
Shellock FG, Spinazzi A. MRI safety update 2008: part 2, screening patients for MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Oct;191(4):1140-9.
187. [-3197639]
American College of Radiology. ACR–AAPM Technical Standard for Diagnostic Medical Physics Performance Monitoring of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging Equipment. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=57+&releaseId=2