ACR–AIUM–SRU PRACTICE PARAMETER FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF ULTRASOUND EVALUATION OF THE PROSTATE (AND SURROUNDING STRUCTURES)

PREAMBLE

I. INTRODUCTION

II. INDICATIONS

III. QUALIFICATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PHYSICIAN

IV. SPECIFICATIONS OF THE EXAMINATION

V. DOCUMENTATION

VI. EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS

VII. QUALITY CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT, SAFETY, INFECTION CONTROL, AND PATIENT EDUCATION

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

REFERENCES

1. [17030221] Wasserman NF.. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review and ultrasound classification. [Review] [53 refs]. Radiol Clin North Am. 44(5):689-710, viii, 2006 Sep.
2. [-3197876] Onur MR, Turgut AT, Dogra V. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: new updates. Ultrasound Clinics 2014;9:81-94.
3. [-3197877] Turgut AT, Kismali E, Dogra V. Prostate biopsies and controversies. Ultrasound Clinics 2013;8:605-15.
4. [17392247] Hricak H, Choyke PL, Eberhardt SC, Leibel SA, Scardino PT. Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. Radiology. 2007 Apr;243(1):28-53.
5. [17885053] Kundra V, Silverman PM, Matin SF, Choi H. Imaging in oncology from the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center: diagnosis, staging, and surveillance of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Oct;189(4):830-44.
6. [18821344] Xu S, Kruecker J, Turkbey B, et al. Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies. Comput Aided Surg. 2008 Sep;13(5):255-64.
7. [16301722] Ozden E, Turgut AT, Yaman O, Gülpinar O, Baltaci S. Follow-up of the transrectal ultrasonographic features of the prostate after biopsy: does any ultrasonographically detectable lesion form secondary to the first biopsy?. J Ultrasound Med. 2005 Dec;24(12):1659-63.
8. [18094311] Dubinsky TJ, Cuevas C, Dighe MK, Kolokythas O, Hwang JH. High-intensity focused ultrasound: current potential and oncologic applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Jan;190(1):191-9.
9. [18223121] Kirkham AP, Emberton M, Hoh IM, Illing RO, Freeman AA, Allen C. MR imaging of prostate after treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Radiology. 2008 Mar;246(3):833-44.
10. [17030220] Boczko J, Messing E, Dogra V. Transrectal sonography in prostate evaluation. [Review] [54 refs]. Radiol Clin North Am. 44(5):679-87, viii, 2006 Sep.
11. [20152522] Stock RG, Stone NN. Current topics in the treatment of prostate cancer with low-dose-rate brachytherapy. Urol Clin North Am. 2010 Feb;37(1):83-96, Table of Contents.
12. [18645676] La Vignera S, Calogero AE, Arancio A, Castiglione R, De Grande G, Vicari E. Transrectal ultrasonography in infertile patients with persistently elevated bacteriospermia. Asian J Androl. 2008 Sep;10(5):731-40.
13. [19091354] Galosi AB, Montironi R, Fabiani A, Lacetera V, Galle G, Muzzonigro G. Cystic lesions of the prostate gland: an ultrasound classification with pathological correlation. J Urol. 181(2):647-57, 2009 Feb.
14. [-3149692] American College of Radiology. ACR–SPR–SRU Practice Parameter for Performing and Interpreting Diagnostic Ultrasound Examinations. Available at: https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=24+&releaseId=2
15. [12478122] Shinohara K, Gulati M, Koppie T, Terris MK. Transperineal prostate biopsy after abdominoperineal resection. J Urol. 2003 Jan;169(1):141-4.
16. [-3197878] Halpern EJ. Measurement of the prostate gland. In: McGahan J, Goldberg BB, ed. Atlas of Ultrasound Measurements. 2nd ed. Chicago, Ill: Mosby Year Book; 2005.
17. [18385560] Kim SH, Kim SH, Correlations between the various methods of estimating prostate volume: transabdominal, transrectal, and three-dimensional US. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9(2):134-9.
18. [16036146] McAchran SE, Dogra V, Resnick MI. Office urologic ultrasound. Urol Clin North Am. 2005 Aug;32(3):337-52, vii.
19. [18184177] Zalesky M, Urban M, Smerhovský Z, Zachoval R, Lukes M, Heracek J. Value of power Doppler sonography with 3D reconstruction in preoperative diagnostics of extraprostatic tumor extension in clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Urol. 2008 Jan;15(1):68-75; discussion 75.
20. [-3197621] American College of Radiology. ACR Practice Parameter for Communication of Diagnostic Imaging Findings. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=74+&releaseId=2
21. [-3197641] American College of Radiology. ACR–AAPM Technical Standard for Diagnostic Medical Physics Performance Monitoring of Real Time Ultrasound Equipment. Available at https://gravitas.acr.org/PPTS/GetDocumentView?docId=118+&releaseId=2
22. [19286200] Ching CB, Moussa AS, Li J, Lane BR, Zippe C, Jones JS. Does transrectal ultrasound probe configuration really matter? End fire versus side fire probe prostate cancer detection rates. J Urol. 2009 May;181(5):2077-82; discussion 2082-3.